The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Elections in America

Everything related to politics in Cyprus and the rest of the world.

Postby dinos » Thu Jul 03, 2008 4:30 am

GorillaGal wrote:so what does this mean dinos? are you voting in this election? (can you?) who will you vote for?


Yes, I can vote. It's slim pickings for sure but I'd vote for Nader purely for protest. I have my problems with him as he's way too consumer friendly for me. But hey - he hasn't got a snowball's chance in hell of winning, making that pill easier to swallow.
User avatar
dinos
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 853
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 8:28 pm
Location: New York

Re: Elections in America

Postby NikosGB23 » Thu Jul 03, 2008 6:33 am

paliometoxo wrote:How do the americans on this forum feel about the up coming elections in america, january 2009 if im not mistaken?

From what i read online and from americans i speak to most will be glad to see Bush gone, and that america is now 5 trillion dollars in debt for this long war in Iraq?

A black man bill clintons wife and i forget who else will run? who would you guys vote for?


Don't really care because I'm planning on moving to Cyprus before this is all in effect. But, I want Barack O'Bama to make history! :)

Yay!
NikosGB23
Member
Member
 
Posts: 123
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 2:27 am
Location: Lefkosia

Postby GorillaGal » Thu Jul 03, 2008 12:57 pm

dinos wrote:
GorillaGal wrote:so what does this mean dinos? are you voting in this election? (can you?) who will you vote for?


Yes, I can vote. It's slim pickings for sure but I'd vote for Nader purely for protest. I have my problems with him as he's way too consumer friendly for me. But hey - he hasn't got a snowball's chance in hell of winning, making that pill easier to swallow.



hahahhaaha, it's people like you that put Bush in office.
User avatar
GorillaGal
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4458
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 12:31 am
Location: new york

Re: Elections in America

Postby EPSILON » Thu Jul 03, 2008 1:56 pm

NikosGB23 wrote:
paliometoxo wrote:How do the americans on this forum feel about the up coming elections in america, january 2009 if im not mistaken?

From what i read online and from americans i speak to most will be glad to see Bush gone, and that america is now 5 trillion dollars in debt for this long war in Iraq?

A black man bill clintons wife and i forget who else will run? who would you guys vote for?


Don't really care because I'm planning on moving to Cyprus before this is all in effect. But, I want Barack O'Bama to make history! :)

Like Carter did? Of course is his turn - the good guys have to govern now. 5-max 10 years and then again the bad guys in power. is a very good and clever game which works perfectly for so many years.

Democracy is not what you are allowed to do but is what you are also able to do!!!

Yay!
User avatar
EPSILON
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2851
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: ATHENS

Postby dinos » Fri Jul 04, 2008 1:17 am

GorillaGal wrote:
dinos wrote:
GorillaGal wrote:so what does this mean dinos? are you voting in this election? (can you?) who will you vote for?


Yes, I can vote. It's slim pickings for sure but I'd vote for Nader purely for protest. I have my problems with him as he's way too consumer friendly for me. But hey - he hasn't got a snowball's chance in hell of winning, making that pill easier to swallow.



hahahhaaha, it's people like you that put Bush in office.


No, it's people that voted for Bush that put Bush in office.
User avatar
dinos
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 853
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 8:28 pm
Location: New York

Postby GorillaGal » Fri Jul 04, 2008 1:23 am

dinos wrote:
GorillaGal wrote:
dinos wrote:
GorillaGal wrote:so what does this mean dinos? are you voting in this election? (can you?) who will you vote for?


Yes, I can vote. It's slim pickings for sure but I'd vote for Nader purely for protest. I have my problems with him as he's way too consumer friendly for me. But hey - he hasn't got a snowball's chance in hell of winning, making that pill easier to swallow.



hahahhaaha, it's people like you that put Bush in office.


No, it's people that voted for Bush that put Bush in office.


no, it's people that didn't vote democrat as oppesed to republican and other parties. if the people that voted for Nader last election voted democratic, there would be a different person in the white house today. it was a close election........
User avatar
GorillaGal
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4458
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 12:31 am
Location: new york

Re: Elections in America

Postby NikosGB23 » Fri Jul 04, 2008 2:35 am

EPSILON wrote:
NikosGB23 wrote:
paliometoxo wrote:How do the americans on this forum feel about the up coming elections in america, january 2009 if im not mistaken?

From what i read online and from americans i speak to most will be glad to see Bush gone, and that america is now 5 trillion dollars in debt for this long war in Iraq?

A black man bill clintons wife and i forget who else will run? who would you guys vote for?


Don't really care because I'm planning on moving to Cyprus before this is all in effect. But, I want Barack O'Bama to make history! :)

Like Carter did? Of course is his turn - the good guys have to govern now. 5-max 10 years and then again the bad guys in power. is a very good and clever game which works perfectly for so many years.

Democracy is not what you are allowed to do but is what you are also able to do!!!

Yay!


It's not really so much a game, just politics.
NikosGB23
Member
Member
 
Posts: 123
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 2:27 am
Location: Lefkosia

Postby dinos » Fri Jul 04, 2008 3:06 am

GorillaGal wrote:
dinos wrote:
GorillaGal wrote:
dinos wrote:
GorillaGal wrote:so what does this mean dinos? are you voting in this election? (can you?) who will you vote for?


Yes, I can vote. It's slim pickings for sure but I'd vote for Nader purely for protest. I have my problems with him as he's way too consumer friendly for me. But hey - he hasn't got a snowball's chance in hell of winning, making that pill easier to swallow.



hahahhaaha, it's people like you that put Bush in office.


No, it's people that voted for Bush that put Bush in office.


no, it's people that didn't vote democrat as oppesed to republican and other parties. if the people that voted for Nader last election voted democratic, there would be a different person in the white house today. it was a close election........


GG, your point is entirely without merit. If Gore had run a half-way intelligent campaign instead of running around slobbering on his hag of a wife on stage to show that he's sensitive to female voters, he'd have gone further.

Gore cost himself that election by being a bigger disaster than Bush. If he was a strong candidate, he'd have won over Nader's supporters. Nobody is obligated to vote for any particular party and support of a third party simply cannot be construed as support of one of the larger two by the loser of the larger two parties. Some people reject the choice of two evils to vote for. Good for them.
User avatar
dinos
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 853
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 8:28 pm
Location: New York

Postby GorillaGal » Fri Jul 04, 2008 5:38 am

well dinos, we will agree to disagree. we are entitled to more than just a democratic or republican party, but since the huge majority votes for one of those two parties, a vote for anyone other is pretty much a wasted vote.
User avatar
GorillaGal
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4458
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 12:31 am
Location: new york

Postby Kikapu » Fri Jul 04, 2008 7:59 pm

dinos wrote:
GG, your point is entirely without merit. If Gore had run a half-way intelligent campaign instead of running around slobbering on his hag of a wife on stage to show that he's sensitive to female voters, he'd have gone further.

Gore cost himself that election by being a bigger disaster than Bush. If he was a strong candidate, he'd have won over Nader's supporters. Nobody is obligated to vote for any particular party and support of a third party simply cannot be construed as support of one of the larger two by the loser of the larger two parties. Some people reject the choice of two evils to vote for. Good for them.


Hi Dinos,

What you say about Gore is fairly true, and had he not distanced himself from Clinton too much, because of "Lewinsky Gate", he could have done much better, despite all the shenanigans with Florida's election board. Also lets not forget, that Gore even lost his home state of Tennessee, which would have gave him the Presidency, so Gore did screw things for himself, no doubt.

Having said all that, this is the part I found it to be troubling for me with Nader and those who supported him in 2000. Gore run on being environmentalist and Bush run on "Fuck the environment", and yet those who supported Nader, as well as being a protest voters, they were also by and large environmentalist. So it defied logic, as to why one would vote for Nader who had no chance of winning to have made a difference on the environment, when Gore would have been a better choice, and on the flip side of the coin, they also knew that Bush could care less about the environment, which their Nader support was in fact a factor in electing Bush, specially in Florida.

Happy 4th of July.!!
User avatar
Kikapu
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 18050
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 6:18 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Politics and Elections

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests