Above you wrote a couple of pluses. Sure, some people will return to their properties and some will be compensated.
But is not only pluses as you know.
What everybody does (T/C and G/C) is to put these pluses on one side of the scale and the minuses on the other. For example the pluses that you mentioned above do not apply at all to me: I will not return to any village and I will not be compensated. Actually I will have to pay for the compensation of refugees, and I will have to pay for the T/C (and the settler!!!) that will be relocated something that should have been done by Turkey and not us.
Maybe
some refugees when they put these pluses and minuses they will decide that the pluses are a bit more, take the risk and vote yes.
The rest of the G/C will have very little pluses and a lot of minuses, so the decision is much easier.
What is on offer to those same people if the plan is rejected?
Even if we assume that a better solution can not be found (which is possible since after May 1st we will be in a bit more powerful position), have you heard of Titina Loizidou? If we accept the Annan plan all the other cases like Titina's will be stopped. But if we don't accept the plan, nothing can stop those cases.
Of course those same people while they might not get their properties back, for now at least, they will not have all the other minuses of the Annan plan either.
I suspect your terms have no chance of success
My terms is federation (e.g. like US, not confederation like in Annan plan), democracy, human rights, no foreign armies, independent Cyprus with
all Cypriots equal EU citizens.
Is it too little for your 18% minority to have a federal state like in the US? You can't accept democracy and human rights and you want derivations? You want Turkish army always in Cyprus?
If you want the above then your terms have no chance of success either.
What I offer is something very honest and beneficial for
both of us.