Get Real! wrote:samarkeolog wrote:Well, if you assume 3 people in each house, and nearly a thousand houses were partially or completely destroyed (527+50+240+whatever number of the 38 and 122 'houses and shops' in Ktima...), that's between about 2,400 and 3,000 Cypriots' homes deliberately destroyed, in a population of about 600,000 at the time. Maybe one in every 200 Cypriots had their homes deliberately destroyed by September 1964. That is a lot. And when most or all of those homes were Turkish Cypriot, that could be up to 3,000 in 120,000, or 1 in 40... That is a hell of a lot.
Save your convenient speculation for ATCA because this here is the CF and on the CF if you ain't got CREDIBLE EVIDENCE you ain't got jack-shit!
ATCA?
Really!? Look, I've been harassed by Turkish Cypriot police and harassed and threatened by Turkish paramilitary intelligence for my work. I had to leave northern Cyprus before I'd finished my fieldwork there. I'm not someone you can dismiss as a Turkish propagandist. Be serious or be quiet.
What speculation is involved?
The numbers of partially or completely destroyed houses comes from the UN Secretary-General's (1964: 48 - para. 180) report: 'in 109 villages, most of them Turkish Cypriot or mixed villages, 527 houses have been destroyed while 2,000 others have suffered damage from looting. In Ktima 38 houses and shops have been destroyed totally and 122 partially. Ιn the Omorphita suburb of Nicosia 50 houses have been totally destroyed while a further 240 have been partially destroyed there and in adjacent suburbs.'
The population numbers come from the census, about 600,000, about 109,200 (18.2%) of whom were Turkish Cypriots. (I'd just gone for 20% of 600,000 before, to make it easy to calculate in my head, but now you've got the precise numbers.)
I had made a low estimate of the average number of people per household, to be safe. I've now found a source for it, and at least in Alambra and Petrophani, it's not three, but five (Yerkes, 2000: 25). So between about 4,000 and 4,800 Cypriots' homes were already destroyed by September 1964, at least 1 in 125.
(Canadian former UN peacekeeper) Richard Patrick (1976: 96-97n61) judged that (pre-1974) conflict drove 252 Greek Cypriots of 6 villages from their homes, 63 from Ambelikou, 25 from Ayios Sozomenos, 34 from Lefka, 20 from Mansoura, 23 from Yerovasa and 87 from Gouphes.
(Note: that means that the other villages, evacuated by Turkish Cypriots, equal 109-6... 103.)
So
even if every single home of every conflict-displaced Greek Cypriot household were completely destroyed, that would only account for 50 of the nearly 1,000 destroyed homes. So, using only UN and former-UN-peacekeepers' data, nearly 950 (obviously, 95%) of the homes destroyed by September 1964 were Turkish Cypriot. Approximately 4,750 (more than 4% of all) Turkish Cypriots' homes had been destroyed - more than 4% of all Turkish Cypriots', 1 in 23.
Again, even if every single home of every conflict-displaced Greek Cypriot household were destroyed, that would mean that, on top of the 950 partially or completely destroyed Turkish Cypriot homes,
according to UN data, a further 2,000 Turkish Cypriot homes would have been looted. So nearly 10,000(/9% of/1 in 11) Turkish Cypriots' homes were looted. Together, then, about 14,750/13.5% of/1 in 7.5 Turkish Cypriots had their (2,950) homes
either looted
or destroyed by September 1964.
There. Every single claim is a fact backed up by a statistic from the UN, or a former UN peacekeeper, or the Republic of Cyprus (for the census data).
And again, I remind you that this data is only for what happened until September 1964. The looting and damage and destruction of Turkish Cypriot sites was already massive then and it only got worse.
What now...?
I have been to Agios Sozomenos on two occasions and saw no evidence of fire.
Once more, no-one claimed that every village was burned. No-one claimed that every village was destroyed, with or without fire. (If propagandists do, I'm not one of them, so if you want to disagree with them, you'll have to find them to do it.)
Strangely enough, there's also a church ruined right in the middle of the village!
Do you mean the church that had been ruined for
ages (maybe
hundreds of years), and may never even have been finished when it was built (in the Sixteenth Century)? (You do.)
Presumably, you've also seen the beautifully-preserved stone church next to it, and the smashed stone building with military graffiti on it quite near the broken down National Guard vehicles...
I also have a 1964 report on the event from a British journalist who makes no mention of houses being torched.
See above about burning... And, as (I think) I said in a previous post, it appears that the worst damage and destruction happened after 1974 when the National Guard were using the village as a training ground (presumably after 1978, when a few villagers were still recorded as residents).
Yerkes, R W. 2000: "Ethnoarchaeology in Central Cyprus: Interdisciplinary Studies of Ancient Population and Agriculture by the Athienou Archaeological Project". <u>Near Eastern Archaeology</u>, Volume 63, Number 1, 20-34.