Nikitas wrote:I do not know how old you are Shah, but most of us here recall that from Monday July 15 till Friday of the same week the Greek Cypriots fought and to a large extent kept at bay the coup against the Cypriot government. Obviously it does not suit your mindset to admit that detail. The facts are there, and some people here, like your mate Zan, are always eager to attribute the thousands of civilian casualties to that fighting and not the Turkish invasion.
That detail aside, obejectively, the Greek Cypriots have proven their biological and political survivability in very tough times. They are infinitely better off today than they were at any time since 1200 AD. Not bad!
Kikapu wrote:The Kurds are a MINORITY in an internationally recognized democratic country with an internationally recognized government, and are wishing to take land from 2 other countries other then Turkey in order to claim their independent land called Kurdistan.
Shah,
Although you raise an interesting argument with the above, it is very much flawed when it comes to Cyprus. The Kurds are where they were from hundreds of years. They are at the same location as before. They were not living all over Turkey and suddenly they all moved to the Eastern part of Turkey so that they can claim that part of Turkey as their new country. They have not kicked anyone of their land as the case has been in Cyprus. The TC's in Cyprus belong to every inch of Cyprus just as the GC's. We never had the North as ours. I know that's all you know, because of your age since you were born into that part and to you, the North has always been Turkish Cypriot land. At least that's how you were taught, I'm sure.
shahmaran wrote:I believe they have drawn their map according to the concentration of their ethnic population around the region, hence why they come up with such a ridiculously huge map for the supposed Kurdistan.
Nikitas wrote:A lot is made of the Enosis goal of the 50s. It is ironic that if the GCs had succeded the TCs would be in a much better position today than any other community of the island. Firstly they would have tremendous political clout as the deciding vote in all elections, local, regional, national and Euroelections. Under the Eu funding schemes they would receive funds for regional and communal development. In effect they would have more of everything than they have now. Strange but Rolandis is citing only the stubborness of one side, when what he says goes both ways.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests