Cyprus-Forum.com

[DT.]

what about the 12.000 army and 100.000 armed reservists?

What about them VP, all you need is a few plane to napalm boms and your problems solved.
are you scared, well you should be, go crawl back into your cave now.

Will you get rid of these as well? why dont you go first and we will follow, declare it to the world and take action, take the initiative for a change.

whats wrong with simultaneously observed by the EU, the UN and the US like our proposal said?

[zan]

you wanna talk numbers?

Lets talk 4-1 tanks in your favour
lets talk 5-1 missile launchers in your favour
Lets talk 4-1 regular troops in your favour
Lets talk 70,000,000 Vs 700,000

The proposal we placed on the table was for a full demilitarisation of the island but Zan's YES man Denktash rejected it.

Now that is funny DT.......Sour grapes or what...Didn't matter when we had home made guns and you had tanks from Greece did it...The murdering that went on when you were on top..... Given those numbers we have had peace since 1974...Shame you couldn't hold back your murdering army when you had the capabilities.....

strange how even in this massacre in the 60's more GC's died than TCs. Are we tha crap at fighting?

No.....Just treacherous fools that killed your own.....

[Viewpoint]

what about the 12.000 army and 100.000 armed reservists?

What about them VP, all you need is a few plane to napalm boms and your problems solved.
are you scared, well you should be, go crawl back into your cave now.

Will you get rid of these as well? why dont you go first and we will follow, declare it to the world and take action, take the initiative for a change.

whats wrong with simultaneously observed by the EU, the UN and the US like our proposal said?

Im all for it providing its part of a comprehensive solution.

[DT.]

what about the 12.000 army and 100.000 armed reservists?

What about them VP, all you need is a few plane to napalm boms and your problems solved.
are you scared, well you should be, go crawl back into your cave now.

Will you get rid of these as well? why dont you go first and we will follow, declare it to the world and take action, take the initiative for a change.

whats wrong with simultaneously observed by the EU, the UN and the US like our proposal said?

Im all for it providing its part of a comprehensive solution.

there you go ...we start talking in one direction and then when you can' argue anymore you spin it around to say "very nice if its part of a comprehensive solution"

you just wrote..."why don't you go first and we will follow."

Whats the matter if its done siumultaneously you afraid you won't be able to screw us?

[zan]

what about the 12.000 army and 100.000 armed reservists?

What about them VP, all you need is a few plane to napalm boms and your problems solved.
are you scared, well you should be, go crawl back into your cave now.

Will you get rid of these as well? why dont you go first and we will follow, declare it to the world and take action, take the initiative for a change.

whats wrong with simultaneously observed by the EU, the UN and the US like our proposal said?

Im all for it providing its part of a comprehensive solution.

there you go ...we start talking in one direction and then when you can' argue anymore you spin it around to say "very nice if its part of a comprehensive solution"

you just wrote..."why don't you go first and we will follow."

Whats the matter if its done siumultaneously you afraid you won't be able to screw us?

What do you mean screw you...How will you stop us if there is no army there...OH! I see...More "Inter-communal conflict"......Nice!!!!

[Viewpoint]

what about the 12.000 army and 100.000 armed reservists?

What about them VP, all you need is a few plane to napalm boms and your problems solved.
are you scared, well you should be, go crawl back into your cave now.

Will you get rid of these as well? why dont you go first and we will follow, declare it to the world and take action, take the initiative for a change.

whats wrong with simultaneously observed by the EU, the UN and the US like our proposal said?

Im all for it providing its part of a comprehensive solution.

there you go ...we start talking in one direction and then when you can' argue anymore you spin it around to say "very nice if its part of a comprehensive solution"

you just wrote..."why don't you go first and we will follow."

Whats the matter if its done siumultaneously you afraid you won't be able to screw us?

No nothing to do with that, I have grave concerns that if the detterant being the Turkish army go there will be mayhem without a comprehensive solution, 800.000 GCs vs 200.000 TCs how will you stop people from reclaimng their properties without a structure to ensure a smooth path towards the ultimate goal? Or is that what you want pure mayhem?

[DT.]

what about the 12.000 army and 100.000 armed reservists?

What about them VP, all you need is a few plane to napalm boms and your problems solved.
are you scared, well you should be, go crawl back into your cave now.

Will you get rid of these as well? why dont you go first and we will follow, declare it to the world and take action, take the initiative for a change.

whats wrong with simultaneously observed by the EU, the UN and the US like our proposal said?

Im all for it providing its part of a comprehensive solution.

there you go ...we start talking in one direction and then when you can' argue anymore you spin it around to say "very nice if its part of a comprehensive solution"

you just wrote..."why don't you go first and we will follow."

Whats the matter if its done siumultaneously you afraid you won't be able to screw us?

No nothing to do with that, I have grave concerns that if the detterant being the Turkish army go there will be mayhem without a comprehensive solution, 800.000 GCs vs 200.000 TCs how will you stop people from reclaimng their properties without a structure to ensure a smooth path towards the ultimate goal? Or is that what you want pure mayhem?

a nato force could be put in its place until a solution is found. You'll find we're friendlier and easier to talk to when 40,000 guns are not pointing at us. This is what zan fails to realise. You can't have an entire population under constant threat of a foreign army and not expect attitudes to be extremely hostile.

[zan]

what about the 12.000 army and 100.000 armed reservists?

What about them VP, all you need is a few plane to napalm boms and your problems solved.
are you scared, well you should be, go crawl back into your cave now.

Will you get rid of these as well? why dont you go first and we will follow, declare it to the world and take action, take the initiative for a change.

whats wrong with simultaneously observed by the EU, the UN and the US like our proposal said?

Im all for it providing its part of a comprehensive solution.

there you go ...we start talking in one direction and then when you can' argue anymore you spin it around to say "very nice if its part of a comprehensive solution"

you just wrote..."why don't you go first and we will follow."

Whats the matter if its done siumultaneously you afraid you won't be able to screw us?

No nothing to do with that, I have grave concerns that if the detterant being the Turkish army go there will be mayhem without a comprehensive solution, 800.000 GCs vs 200.000 TCs how will you stop people from reclaimng their properties without a structure to ensure a smooth path towards the ultimate goal? Or is that what you want pure mayhem?

a nato force could be put in its place until a solution is found. You'll find we're friendlier and easier to talk to when 40,000 guns are not pointing at us. This is what zan fails to realise. You can't have an entire population under constant threat of a foreign army and not expect attitudes to be extremely hostile.

What do you plan to do to antagonize them...Turkeys interests are protected where they are now...It would do them no good to go any further and you know that...They are here to protect us and their interests which is not something that is going to go away.....

[DT.]

what about the 12.000 army and 100.000 armed reservists?

What about them VP, all you need is a few plane to napalm boms and your problems solved.
are you scared, well you should be, go crawl back into your cave now.

Will you get rid of these as well? why dont you go first and we will follow, declare it to the world and take action, take the initiative for a change.

whats wrong with simultaneously observed by the EU, the UN and the US like our proposal said?

Im all for it providing its part of a comprehensive solution.

there you go ...we start talking in one direction and then when you can' argue anymore you spin it around to say "very nice if its part of a comprehensive solution"

you just wrote..."why don't you go first and we will follow."

Whats the matter if its done siumultaneously you afraid you won't be able to screw us?

No nothing to do with that, I have grave concerns that if the detterant being the Turkish army go there will be mayhem without a comprehensive solution, 800.000 GCs vs 200.000 TCs how will you stop people from reclaimng their properties without a structure to ensure a smooth path towards the ultimate goal? Or is that what you want pure mayhem?

a nato force could be put in its place until a solution is found. You'll find we're friendlier and easier to talk to when 40,000 guns are not pointing at us. This is what zan fails to realise. You can't have an entire population under constant threat of a foreign army and not expect attitudes to be extremely hostile.

What do you plan to do to antagonize them...Turkeys interests are protected where they are now...It would do them no good to go any further and you know that...They are here to protect us and their interests which is not something that is going to go away.....

then what the hell are we talking about a CY problem then? Turkey is set just fine. All your crap about delaying tactics and propaganda goes down the drain with those 3 little words

TURKEY IS HAPPY

[zan]

what about the 12.000 army and 100.000 armed reservists?

What about them VP, all you need is a few plane to napalm boms and your problems solved.
are you scared, well you should be, go crawl back into your cave now.

Will you get rid of these as well? why dont you go first and we will follow, declare it to the world and take action, take the initiative for a change.

whats wrong with simultaneously observed by the EU, the UN and the US like our proposal said?

Im all for it providing its part of a comprehensive solution.

there you go ...we start talking in one direction and then when you can' argue anymore you spin it around to say "very nice if its part of a comprehensive solution"

you just wrote..."why don't you go first and we will follow."

Whats the matter if its done siumultaneously you afraid you won't be able to screw us?

No nothing to do with that, I have grave concerns that if the detterant being the Turkish army go there will be mayhem without a comprehensive solution, 800.000 GCs vs 200.000 TCs how will you stop people from reclaimng their properties without a structure to ensure a smooth path towards the ultimate goal? Or is that what you want pure mayhem?

a nato force could be put in its place until a solution is found. You'll find we're friendlier and easier to talk to when 40,000 guns are not pointing at us. This is what zan fails to realise. You can't have an entire population under constant threat of a foreign army and not expect attitudes to be extremely hostile.

What do you plan to do to antagonize them...Turkeys interests are protected where they are now...It would do them no good to go any further and you know that...They are here to protect us and their interests which is not something that is going to go away.....

then what the hell are we talking about a CY problem then? Turkey is set just fine. All your crap about delaying tactics and propaganda goes down the drain with those 3 little words

TURKEY IS HAPPY

I am sorry but I can't see those words in what I wrote>>>can you point them out to me?????