The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


so why 40,000 troops?

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby DT. » Wed Feb 06, 2008 1:09 am

zan wrote:
DT. wrote:
zan wrote:
DT. wrote:
Viewpoint wrote:
DT. wrote:
Viewpoint wrote:
DT. wrote:
Viewpoint wrote:
Marz wrote:what about the 12.000 army and 100.000 armed reservists?

What about them VP, all you need is a few plane to napalm boms and your problems solved.
are you scared, well you should be, go crawl back into your cave now.


Will you get rid of these as well? why dont you go first and we will follow, declare it to the world and take action, take the initiative for a change.


whats wrong with simultaneously observed by the EU, the UN and the US like our proposal said?


Im all for it providing its part of a comprehensive solution.


there you go ...we start talking in one direction and then when you can' argue anymore you spin it around to say "very nice if its part of a comprehensive solution"

you just wrote..."why don't you go first and we will follow."

Whats the matter if its done siumultaneously you afraid you won't be able to screw us?


No nothing to do with that, I have grave concerns that if the detterant being the Turkish army go there will be mayhem without a comprehensive solution, 800.000 GCs vs 200.000 TCs how will you stop people from reclaimng their properties without a structure to ensure a smooth path towards the ultimate goal? Or is that what you want pure mayhem?


a nato force could be put in its place until a solution is found. You'll find we're friendlier and easier to talk to when 40,000 guns are not pointing at us. This is what zan fails to realise. You can't have an entire population under constant threat of a foreign army and not expect attitudes to be extremely hostile.


What do you plan to do to antagonize them...Turkeys interests are protected where they are now...It would do them no good to go any further and you know that...They are here to protect us and their interests which is not something that is going to go away.....


then what the hell are we talking about a CY problem then? Turkey is set just fine. All your crap about delaying tactics and propaganda goes down the drain with those 3 little words

TURKEY IS HAPPY



I am sorry but I can't see those words in what I wrote>>>can you point them out to me?????



Eermm
Turkeys interests are protected where they are now...It would do them no good to go any further and you know that...They are here to protect us and their interests which is not something that is going to go away
User avatar
DT.
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12684
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 8:34 pm
Location: Lefkosia

Postby zan » Wed Feb 06, 2008 1:14 am

DT. wrote:
zan wrote:
DT. wrote:
zan wrote:
DT. wrote:
Viewpoint wrote:
DT. wrote:
Viewpoint wrote:
DT. wrote:
Viewpoint wrote:
Marz wrote:what about the 12.000 army and 100.000 armed reservists?

What about them VP, all you need is a few plane to napalm boms and your problems solved.
are you scared, well you should be, go crawl back into your cave now.


Will you get rid of these as well? why dont you go first and we will follow, declare it to the world and take action, take the initiative for a change.


whats wrong with simultaneously observed by the EU, the UN and the US like our proposal said?


Im all for it providing its part of a comprehensive solution.


there you go ...we start talking in one direction and then when you can' argue anymore you spin it around to say "very nice if its part of a comprehensive solution"

you just wrote..."why don't you go first and we will follow."

Whats the matter if its done siumultaneously you afraid you won't be able to screw us?


No nothing to do with that, I have grave concerns that if the detterant being the Turkish army go there will be mayhem without a comprehensive solution, 800.000 GCs vs 200.000 TCs how will you stop people from reclaimng their properties without a structure to ensure a smooth path towards the ultimate goal? Or is that what you want pure mayhem?


a nato force could be put in its place until a solution is found. You'll find we're friendlier and easier to talk to when 40,000 guns are not pointing at us. This is what zan fails to realise. You can't have an entire population under constant threat of a foreign army and not expect attitudes to be extremely hostile.


What do you plan to do to antagonize them...Turkeys interests are protected where they are now...It would do them no good to go any further and you know that...They are here to protect us and their interests which is not something that is going to go away.....


then what the hell are we talking about a CY problem then? Turkey is set just fine. All your crap about delaying tactics and propaganda goes down the drain with those 3 little words

TURKEY IS HAPPY



I am sorry but I can't see those words in what I wrote>>>can you point them out to me?????



Eermm
Turkeys interests are protected where they are now...It would do them no good to go any further and you know that...They are here to protect us and their interests which is not something that is going to go away


I was looking for the words you wrote but still can't see them...The reply...As if you didn't know.....Was because you said you were worried about the guns pointed at you and that is why there has been nothing positive coming out of the "RoC". I said that you have nothing to worry about in hat respect unless you attack where we will defend our selves....That has noting to do with Turkey being happy about the situation....A recognised and ally in the TRNC/KKTC will do fine or her position in the Zurich agreement..Of course entry into the EU will do as well and that is why you are trying to block all of these things........You crafty little bunch yer!
User avatar
zan
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 16213
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 8:55 pm

Postby DT. » Wed Feb 06, 2008 1:20 am

reasons to fear? How about Strovillia 4-5 years ago. Turkish army decided to advance about 400 metres, kicked a guy out of his house and made it a guardpost.
User avatar
DT.
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12684
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 8:34 pm
Location: Lefkosia

Postby zan » Wed Feb 06, 2008 1:28 am

DT. wrote:reasons to fear? How about Strovillia 4-5 years ago. Turkish army decided to advance about 400 metres, kicked a guy out of his house and made it a guardpost.


Was that the guy in the buffer zone who shouldn't have been there :roll: :roll: :roll:
User avatar
zan
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 16213
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 8:55 pm

Postby boomerang » Wed Feb 06, 2008 1:30 am

zan wrote:
DT. wrote:reasons to fear? How about Strovillia 4-5 years ago. Turkish army decided to advance about 400 metres, kicked a guy out of his house and made it a guardpost.


Was that the guy in the buffer zone who shouldn't have been there :roll: :roll: :roll:


if it was in the buffer zone, why is then Image put a guard post?
User avatar
boomerang
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 7337
Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 5:56 am

Postby DT. » Wed Feb 06, 2008 1:32 am

zan wrote:
DT. wrote:reasons to fear? How about Strovillia 4-5 years ago. Turkish army decided to advance about 400 metres, kicked a guy out of his house and made it a guardpost.


Was that the guy in the buffer zone who shouldn't have been there :roll: :roll: :roll:


well on monday he wasn't in the buffer zone....on Tuesday he was and by wednesday he was under occupation. C'est la vie.
User avatar
DT.
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12684
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 8:34 pm
Location: Lefkosia

Postby Marz » Wed Feb 06, 2008 1:35 am

it seems that you guys think you got what you want or what "turkey" wants from the conflict so why are you guys here posting crap when you raly dont want a solution apparently you are fine where you are if we have nothing to offer you?
Well then stay there but youll never be a part of anything. Since you dont have an appropriate solution.
You cant even solve the problems to your economic and isolation probblems.
User avatar
Marz
Member
Member
 
Posts: 151
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 7:26 am
Location: melbourne

Postby zan » Wed Feb 06, 2008 1:35 am

boomerang wrote:
zan wrote:
DT. wrote:reasons to fear? How about Strovillia 4-5 years ago. Turkish army decided to advance about 400 metres, kicked a guy out of his house and made it a guardpost.


Was that the guy in the buffer zone who shouldn't have been there :roll: :roll: :roll:


if it was in the buffer zone, why is then Image put a guard post?


Not if Boomers..He was......The guard I suppose was to make sure he did not come back...A tit for tat action I suppose.......
User avatar
zan
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 16213
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 8:55 pm

Postby DT. » Wed Feb 06, 2008 1:37 am

zan wrote:
boomerang wrote:
zan wrote:
DT. wrote:reasons to fear? How about Strovillia 4-5 years ago. Turkish army decided to advance about 400 metres, kicked a guy out of his house and made it a guardpost.


Was that the guy in the buffer zone who shouldn't have been there :roll: :roll: :roll:


if it was in the buffer zone, why is then Image put a guard post?


Not if Boomers..He was......The guard I suppose was to make sure he did not come back...A tit for tat action I suppose.......


he wasn't in the buffer zone :roll: Anyway even if he was the only troops aloud to setup posts in the biffer zone are the UN.
User avatar
DT.
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12684
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 8:34 pm
Location: Lefkosia

Postby boomerang » Wed Feb 06, 2008 1:37 am

zan wrote:
boomerang wrote:
zan wrote:
DT. wrote:reasons to fear? How about Strovillia 4-5 years ago. Turkish army decided to advance about 400 metres, kicked a guy out of his house and made it a guardpost.


Was that the guy in the buffer zone who shouldn't have been there :roll: :roll: :roll:


if it was in the buffer zone, why is then Image put a guard post?


Not if Boomers..He was......The guard I suppose was to make sure he did not come back...A tit for tat action I suppose.......


so now Image is in charge of the buffer zone?...silly me I thought the UN was... :lol:
User avatar
boomerang
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 7337
Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 5:56 am

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest