denizaksulu wrote:phoenix wrote:denizaksulu wrote:phoenix wrote:denizaksulu wrote:phoenix wrote:denizaksulu wrote:phoenix wrote:Really any language at my fingertips :shock:
Hello I am writing in Zulu
Цулл иүц Ш йт цжшэшиа ши Түиаүлшй №
Хун эхшы шы жуйллн ёүүл
That was Mongolian, because Zulu is frankly the same as English!.... Could that be right or did I set Zulu up wrong?
Oh well, time for another language:
Тщц Ш фь Екнштп Лнкпны цршср шы Снкшддшс иге ещщ ышьшфдк ещ Ьщтпщдшфт
Now that was Kyrgyz which is another Cyrillic language ... but too similar to Mongolian so boring!
Hey I don't have Mandarin :(
Please tell me that you made a deliberate mistake by calling Kirgiz a cyrillic language. The alphabet used is but the Language itself is the lovely Turkic language you admire so much.
As first and foremost a scientist I see things as they are.
If the alphabet is Cyrillic based, then the basis of the language is also ... Turkic languages may be Cyrillic based or not ... What is your point?
I neither love nor admire any of them but see them merely as tools for effective communication, or not, as the case may be. They are man-made... I tend to admire nature-made substances more.
Greek by its very nature, provides the simplest most effective mean of communication ...
It meets all requirements pour moi!
Καταλαβαις;
I dont know why you bother if the case is as you state.
During Russian expansion into the Asiatic continent they imposed the Cyrillic alphabet on many of the Nations there. Just as an example, in Azerbaydjan, the original Language was in the Arabic script, the changed to the Cyrillic, then back to the Arabic and then to the Roman alphabet.
Your arrogance will never admit a mistake, but I am prepared to accept it as an oversight. What a scientist.
Au contraire ....
The beauty of any language lies in its simplicity and adaptability..
It is a tool, usually that has grown because of science.
I still do not understand what point you are trying to make.... as you are failing to use English effectively!
My oint is that Kirghiz is not a Cyrillic Language, it is merely using the alhabet imposed on them by the Imperialist Russians. Stop playing the fool here. Talking about a kid and his/hers new toy.
Deniz ... I still do not undertand the "oint" you are trying to make?
Thank you for 'ointing' out my typo error. I am sure you see my 'oint'.
I am trying to make sure that the Kirghiz language does not end up being 'Greek' just because of the use of the Cyrillic alphabet. Gadalavis?
I never implied that it was .... I like links between things and seeing how one thing evolves into another but that does not minimise the individuality of any particular item.
We are all the sum of our parts ....
However, I do not approve of too much intervention just because someone wants to make an "oint" ......