zan wrote:denizaksulu wrote:zan wrote:denizaksulu wrote:zan wrote:denizaksulu wrote:zan wrote:denizaksulu wrote:zan wrote:Anyway....Back to the subject.........The Brits were to blame...I don't think so..They even warned of the consequences of ENOSIS....
Churchill's response
Let me give you a historic example on the issue. In 1907, Sir Winston S. Churchill of Britain plans to pay a visit to the island. Cypriot Greek member of the Kavanin Assembly, Bishop Kyrillos, reminds Churchill that Greek Cypriots expect a British surprise and permission to the annexation of the island as Britain entertained them with the annexation of seven Aegean islands in the past. Churchill in short responds to Kyrillos that the ruling of the island rests with the Ottoman and Turks may want the same thing as the Greek Cypriots do. Isn't this a marvelous answer?
I bet Churchill did not say those words out of love for the Turks or Ottomans. Mind you it was well before his defeat at Chanakkale. It just did not suit the interests of GB.
It turns out that ENOSIS did not suit anyone Deniz.......Then, now or ever...
Ofcourse not. Even the more intelligent GCs know that now - I think.
What you mean Bananiot and Miltiades...Can't think of any more just now but Kikapu is not one of them....
Kikapu one of them? I had no idea.
Do you mean he has been fooling us all this time?
Well he never answered my question about him discovering that his family were actually Greek converts and that is why he is the way he is and that he has converted back so ................
I had no idea. But why doesnt he come clean about it. Everything he says makes more sense now. Can you get 'double-Lino-Bambakoi'?
Told you........Three times I have asked now and still no reply...