phoenix wrote:I will help to speedily end this injustice of rampant Turk-Tcs running amok and completely lawless in a European country that has never set a foot wrong in their own country ...
Go home Turks .... wherever that may be .
denizaksulu wrote:Get Real! wrote:Observer,
What exactly is your motive? Are you trying to find a loophole to justify and promote the illegally occupied port?
Isn’t a UN resolution condemning this ENTIRE “TRNC” debacle enough for you to realize what the international community thinks and wants?
If the very existence of the “TRNC” is ILLEGAL, in accordance with the world’s highest authority the UN, then how can it be possible that anything the “TRNC” does will be legal?
If and when you are willing & able to confront common sense on this matter your queries will be gone.
Regards, GR.
Hi GR,
I hope you dont mind me asking a simple question. It might help me understand your logic/common sense on this 'generalisation'. Is the HSBC in the North, Illegal? A YES or NO will suffice.
Regards
Deniz
Get Real! wrote:denizaksulu wrote:Get Real! wrote:Observer,
What exactly is your motive? Are you trying to find a loophole to justify and promote the illegally occupied port?
Isn’t a UN resolution condemning this ENTIRE “TRNC” debacle enough for you to realize what the international community thinks and wants?
If the very existence of the “TRNC” is ILLEGAL, in accordance with the world’s highest authority the UN, then how can it be possible that anything the “TRNC” does will be legal?
If and when you are willing & able to confront common sense on this matter your queries will be gone.
Regards, GR.
Hi GR,
I hope you dont mind me asking a simple question. It might help me understand your logic/common sense on this 'generalisation'. Is the HSBC in the North, Illegal? A YES or NO will suffice.
Regards
Deniz
My gripe is that we are beating around the bush when there are very clear facts surrounding the Famagusta port that make any legal/illegal argument pointless:
1. Its current state has come about as a result of the Turkish invasion of 74.
2. It forms part of what is referred to as the “occupied territories”.
3. It falls under UN resolution 541 which requests for its return to the RoC.
4. The TC community is currently using it, and has been using it, for its various internal needs.
5. The RoC condemns its use at the international level.
These are the major facts surrounding the Famagusta port and anyone who thinks that there’s some magical workaround for it to become a bustling Port Said without a solution to the Cyprus dilemma cannot be living in reality.
I don’t wish for my TC compatriots to have a difficult life but they need to realize that this port is no ordinary port but part of a past tragedy and it thus has an extraordinary status that cannot be reversed unless the tragedy itself is reversed.
If and when the TC community’s own status is turned around from a people in an unrecognized enclave and into a people in their recognized country then issues like the Famagusta port will also be resolved overnight so instead of concentrating on the branches of the tree maybe we should really be concentrating on the root.
Regards, GR.
zan wrote:The whole thing came about because of the destruction of the constitution of the Cyprus Republic by use of force by the GCs...Didn't want to go back that far GR did you..... 1974....what a year...1963 was better though.....For you
Get Real! wrote:zan wrote:The whole thing came about because of the destruction of the constitution of the Cyprus Republic by use of force by the GCs...Didn't want to go back that far GR did you..... 1974....what a year...1963 was better though.....For you
Tragedy = the whole Cyprus debacle
Feel better now?
zan wrote:Get Real! wrote:zan wrote:The whole thing came about because of the destruction of the constitution of the Cyprus Republic by use of force by the GCs...Didn't want to go back that far GR did you..... 1974....what a year...1963 was better though.....For you
Tragedy = the whole Cyprus debacle
Feel better now?
Not really..Be more specific
Get Real! wrote:zan wrote:Get Real! wrote:zan wrote:The whole thing came about because of the destruction of the constitution of the Cyprus Republic by use of force by the GCs...Didn't want to go back that far GR did you..... 1974....what a year...1963 was better though.....For you
Tragedy = the whole Cyprus debacle
Feel better now?
Not really..Be more specific
Turkey abandoning some of you on this terrible island?
zan wrote:Get Real! wrote:zan wrote:Get Real! wrote:zan wrote:The whole thing came about because of the destruction of the constitution of the Cyprus Republic by use of force by the GCs...Didn't want to go back that far GR did you..... 1974....what a year...1963 was better though.....For you
Tragedy = the whole Cyprus debacle
Feel better now?
Not really..Be more specific
Turkey abandoning some of you on this terrible island?
Our Mother(land) left us in good hands when she was old and frail......You kicked them out
Get Real! wrote:zan wrote:Get Real! wrote:zan wrote:Get Real! wrote:zan wrote:The whole thing came about because of the destruction of the constitution of the Cyprus Republic by use of force by the GCs...Didn't want to go back that far GR did you..... 1974....what a year...1963 was better though.....For you
Tragedy = the whole Cyprus debacle
Feel better now?
Not really..Be more specific
Turkey abandoning some of you on this terrible island?
Our Mother(land) left us in good hands when she was old and frail......You kicked them out
Mummy told you to return home or get lost in the Treaty of Lausanne...
http://www.cyprus-conflict.net/treaty_of_lausanne.htm
(Articles 20 & 21)
Get Real! wrote:Observer,
What exactly is your motive? Are you trying to find a loophole to justify and promote the illegally occupied port?
Isn’t a UN resolution condemning this ENTIRE “TRNC” debacle enough for you to realize what the international community thinks and wants?
If the very existence of the “TRNC” is ILLEGAL, in accordance with the world’s highest authority the UN, then how can it be possible that anything the “TRNC” does will be legal?
If and when you are willing & able to confront common sense on this matter your queries will be gone.
Regards, GR.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests