http://www.cyprusweekly.com.cy/default. ... =Viewpoint
Now what?
This week has been marked by yet another condemnation of Turkey by the European Court of Human Rights for violations in connection with Cyprus.
This latest condemnation deals with Turkey's failure to live up to its responsibility to assist in determining the fate of the 1,534 Greek Cypriots who are listed as missing in the wake of the 1974 Turkish invasion and occupation of north Cyprus.
The Court ruled that, as a result, Turkey has an obligation under Articles 2 and 3 of the European Convention to assist in determining the fate of these missing persons.
It also stressed that both the establishment of the breakaway Turkish Cypriot state, and the lapse of 32 years since the invasion, have not removed the Turkish government's accountability for the investigative process during the intervening period.
Regretfully, however, as with the previous court judgements, there is no follow up, or punishment of the guilty party, which is thus permitted in effect to continue with, and benefit from, the illegal activities for which it has been found guilty.
It is just as regrettable that the other members of the European family choose not just to do nothing to force Turkey to comply with the judgement of their Rights Court, but continue to treat this criminal state and convicted violator of human rights as worthy for consideration for EU membership and, even worse, to reward it for its blatant contempt of their Court with billions in free aid!
Due praise
THE government deserves due praise for two separate achievements this week.
One was the successful reduction of the Cyprus foreign debt by nearly 12%.This was followed by a consequent cut in income tax and an increase in public benefits. The government claimed this was the result of its economic policy.
The opposition rushed to claim, however, that this was the result of a reduction of expenditure in vital sectors in order to create a good impression in view of the approaching presidential election.
Ordinary taxpayers cannot but be thankful for the reduction, provided this does not have any adverse effect, as claimed by the opposition.