Kikapu wrote:CopperLine wrote:
Kikapu You give the example of issuing a driving licence as a test of the 'stateness' of a country. I'm not sure driving licences are good examples regarding recognition of a state and a distinct jurisdiction, so let's take something fundamental like marriage certificates or birth certificates. For those who say because TRNC is not recognised as a country/state then its jurisdiction including law-setting powers which includes citizenship tests are also not recognised, they are mistaken. If you got married in TRNC or had a baby born in TRNC then those certificates issued by the ostensibly unrecognised TRNC are STILL RECOGNISED by other jurisdictions and other states.
CopperLine,
My use of the Drivers Licence point was to illustrate, that having a fake drivers licence created by me is not going to work when there is already a legal driving licence system in operation. The "TRNC" may want to act like my fake driving licence,
[color=red]but will not be recognised by other authorities,[/color] hence the fact that the "TRNC" is not recognised as a country by the World, because it is a "fake drivers licence". By you using the marriage and birth certificates in the "TRNC" being recognised by others is hardly relevant. No body denies that TC's live or exists in the "TRNC". I have used a birth certificate issued by the "TRNC" when I applied for my US citizenship many years ago, even though I was not born in the "TRNC", but rather in Cyprus, so that is not the point. Adjustments are made to minimize certain problems to the TC's that are politically based, so not to hinder their day to day life. Same time, two astronauts could have gotten married on the moon, or the space station or on a cruise ship in the middle of the ocean, and their marriage would still count in the eyes of the world, despite all those events taking place in NO country at all, recognised or not. It is not intended to deny individual TC's anything by the world, but rather denying a "state" within a State that is acting illegally in the formation of that "state" and then try claiming to be or wanting to be legal, by asking the International community to recognise them. So, individuals are recognised as TC's even if they live in a illegal state, but the illegal state is not recognised as a country.
Stop banging your against the wall again Kiks.....It WILL come....
Reconsidering the Bases?
By Andreas Avgousti
(archive article - Friday, January 25, 2008)
MUCH ADO about nothing seems to be the conclusion one can draw from President Tassos Papadopoulos’ claim that the government has told Great Britain that his government is reconsidering the status of the Sovereign Base Areas (SBA).
The issue has been looming under the surface of political discourse ever since Britain signed a strategic partnership with Turkey on October 23.
The agreement focused on Turkey's bid to join the European Union as well as joint co-operation against terrorism, but crucially referred to the occupied areas as the ‘Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus’ (TRNC).
According to the government, this constitutes implicit recognition of the TRNC by Britain.
“The strategic agreement was a negative development,” Papadopoulos said earlier this week.
“We have notified the British that the whole gamut of issues regarding the bases, their status, the status of Cypriot citizens [living on the bases] and the treaties are, for us, under reconsideration.”
He made the comments when replying to questions regarding the problems for the funding of businesses within the SBA areas.
The President said that there was a problem with the introduction of the euro in the Bases, since the UK has not entered the eurozone, adding that efforts for the acquis communautaire to apply to the Bases were continuing.
A British High Commission spokesman in Nicosia had no immediate comment to make on whether the government had contacted them about the issue.
However, he did tell the Mail that, “Our line is that we remain confident about the legal status of the SBA.”
Spokesman for the SBA Dennis Barnes was in full agreement, adding that, “Any wider discussion should be held with the High Commission and not with us.”
“We would not expect the government to contact us about political and/or legal matters.”
The Greek Cypriot press yesterday offered little in the way of evidence for moves made by the Papadopoulos government, which would excuse the so-called “reconsideration”.
In an article, Alithia wrote that, “the government has never raised the SBA issue either by contacting the British High Commissioner or through the Cyprus High Commission in London, or indeed via the Foreign Ministry or at high level meetings.”
In its editorial, Simerini also pointed out that, “beyond the general proclamations made on the issue, little is to be found which confirms the government’s stated intentions” to reconsider the SBA status.
Ever since they were first instituted as part of the 1960 London-Zurich founding agreements, the SBA have been source of disaffection for the Cypriots.
Britain is Cyprus’ largest trading partner and accounts for the most tourists to the island.
Copyright © Cyprus Mail 2008