Zan,
This has nothing to do with politics, but what the hell happened to your letter "t" on your keyboard, because for the last few weeks, some of your words are missing the letter "t" and I'm beginning to get really "teed off".
Kikapu wrote:Zan,
This has nothing to do with politics, but what the hell happened to your letter "t" on your keyboard, because for the last few weeks, some of your words are missing the letter "t" and I'm beginning to get really "teed off".
.Mate most of the mainlanders here are not citizens as you might think, most of them are from eastern Turkey and are working here for bread money. If you guys are so willing to have troops leave why don't you start do?ng it first? How many troops from greece do you guys have, I bet the number of armed troops in the south is not a man less than the ones in the north
Humanist
Firstly I don't think GC's are even one man short when it comes to millitary man power one the island. If Turkey is the occupying force, then you guys are occupying our government because of this GC's think they can dictate what is "right" what is "wrong", does this make the presence of the Greek armed forces OK? Sorry mate, but I honestly think we are far away from thinking in the "we" sense, let's just learn to tolerate with each other first. Look at nearly every thread in the forum people just try to pick stuff out of what you write and later twist and turn it into different forms and throw it back at your face. I can understand you seeing the Turkish army as invaders, all I'd like you to understand is that the RoC that you guys are so proud of is not what is was meant to be. When it comes to Turkey, I can assure you that the present gov. in Turkey want to get Cyprus out of there hands, I personally don't think Erdogan ( Turkish PM ) gives a shit about us, but even Erdogan can't get it over a done with, without public support. For a guy like him only the packaging is important he needs to be able to show the public that what he did was good. But still under these circumstances "nothing" is happening, this is why I believe if this dispute is not over in the next few years it never will be.
If your job involves business recruiting, I suggest that you look for these variables in your future employees. If they view themselves as belonging to the whole and are aware of how their individual pieces of behaviour impact powerfully on the whole, you have a potential leader.
A leader is alert how every single piece of human behaviour affects the whole, and knows that the whole cannot survive with cancerous cells doing the work. The effective leader knows that future business is determined by each customer is treated in that specific moment of truth when contact is first made. When I encounter a person who has no reference to the whole, I sense that particular business or unit its is serious jeopardy. The clerk who lets me know that I am important and is willing to do whatever it takes to produce results is the employee who makes me want to return to that business. The clerk is one of the harmonious cells that will make the entire body function effectively today and in the future as well.
Within the confines of our own family unit we need each member to be a single individual, functioning alone and at the same time working in harmony with all who share the same unit or household. This can be said of communities, cities, states, countries and the biggest whole of HUMANITY.
When we encompass this concept of oneness and apply it in our daily life, we begin to feel a sense of being a part of the human race rather than of fighting it. We begin to sense that we are all truly in this together and that each and every individual piece of behaviour impacts some way on this body or being called HUMAN BEING.
In the panoramic picture, oneness becomes abundantly clear. Truly great world leaders know that we cannot stay divided and survive. They know that all of the divisions of mankind, whatever those divisions may focus upon, contribute in some way to the destruction of the whole of humanity. Sadly, it is quite difficult for people who think this way to get elected. Voters are predisposed to vote for those who favour their particular divisions, and not leaders who are working toward a harmonious objective for all mankind. ………………. Yet still we have seen some leaders emerge who understand the totality of mankind. Certainly the United nations is one small step forward using cooperation rather than aggression to solve disputes that arise over the borders and divisions we have created in our attempts to carve up our onesong. An Abraham Lincoln surfaced when unity was called for in the previous century. Perhaps there will be another Lincoln in the next century to assist HUMANITY toward harmony.
From the smallest individual cell, up through you as one cell, and outward to all of the units that we see emerging within our social structures, to our largest units which we call countries, and outward even farther to the entire universe, the message is the same, When we sense the oneness in all of this, and we behave as individuals with the highest regard for that totality, we allow the whole to survive and flourish. When we act without respect for the totality, we contribute too the downfall of the whole, and to our destruction in the process.
Seeing the oneness is not simply a metaphysical exercise; it is a way of being that transforms life. When we have harmony within, it becomes automatic to see it in the largest context of how we relate outwardly. We will give away only what we have. When we see it within and vow to have it there, then we will be one more cell seeking oneness, and keeping the self from growing.
humanist wrote:Oh VP the hell with that bloody house ......... it's only four frigin walls. And last time I checked under BBF you will be able to have your say on your future. So get whip out and put Talat in action on coming up with a BBF based solution, :):)
We said yes to the BBF solution out forward by the UN you rejected it so dont you think its upto GCs to bring about a BBF?
Nikitas wrote:To Copperline and Zan regarding their comments above.
A policy of colonisation is evident on the ground. Bringing people over and settling them in GC properties is one such piece of evidence. Another is the political organization of settlers and their active part in TRNC politics. Do not take my word for it, read statements and articles by concerned TC politicians who know the situation better than any of us in this forum.
In any future solution when the populations will be concentrated in one side of the island there is a real risk of a race problem between TCs and mainland Turks, as well as problems between the mainlanders themselves. There is no need to import these problems in Cyprus.
Those who advocate the legalisation of settlers are not communicating with the Cypriot in themeselves. Just imagine how you would feel dealing with the Federal buraucracy if the employee you are talking to is not a Cypriot but a mainland Greek or mainland Turk. Does that make you feel as a citizen of an independent and free nation? And how about seeing nationals of both mainlands being eligible for elected office and perhaps elected.
Those who say the above examples do not bother them are either not Cypriots or they have reached a level of cosmopolitan thinking which obviously escapes me.
Assuming I am alive and in possession of my faculties when a solution comes about, and that solution grants any kind of privilieges to settlers of any nationality over and above what Cypriots get, I will go to court for it. My demand will be equal treatment with settlers and I do believe I will win my case. There is an element of anti Cypriot discrimination in provisions made for settlers and I am surprised that Cypriots of any community cannot see it.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests