The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Can BuySell not read their own graph data?

Feel free to talk about anything that you want.

Postby Sega » Sat Jan 19, 2008 10:21 pm

123456 wrote:
phoenix wrote:Big deal :roll:

3% of an imaginary value.

Is that significant in the great scheme of things? :?


WTF?

No you're right, lets not bother trying to make sure that we are being told the truth anymore. Sod it, we'll swallow whatever we are told without question, it'll make things so much simpler.


No don't do that, it would make things simpler for them not for you. It will almost certainly cost you more in the long run. When I first came I accepted everything I was told, now I am slightly wiser.
User avatar
Sega
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 895
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 10:21 pm

Postby phoenix » Sat Jan 19, 2008 10:25 pm

123456 wrote:
phoenix wrote:Big deal :roll:

3% of an imaginary value.

Is that significant in the great scheme of things? :?


WTF?

No you're right, lets not bother trying to make sure that we are being told the truth anymore. Sod it, we'll swallow whatever we are told without question, it'll make things so much simpler.


Gosh you do over-react.

Science is based on seeking of the truth . . . not man-made finances. :roll:
User avatar
phoenix
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 3452
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 2:47 pm
Location: Free From Forum

Postby 123456 » Sat Jan 19, 2008 11:01 pm

Yes of course that's an over-reaction.

I post about how it *appears* that a press release is quoting a figure that does not match the source data and you respond with something along the lines of "*sigh* who cares, it's not important"

BTW I have no idea what you mean with your whole science versus man-made finances angle. I'm talking about the need for objective reporting and analysis and you seem to be concerned about hitting the bold button and emoticons.
123456
Member
Member
 
Posts: 52
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 6:10 pm

Postby Southerner » Sun Jan 20, 2008 1:43 am

Buy sell are using the same tactics that they have used on UK Sky chanel 679, kidding people.
Tune in to 679 all you'll be told "But you must hurry they're going fast" or "There are only two left so phone this number now to reserve your place in the sun".

What I have seen are examples where people have taken their property out of the estate agents hands yet still ask the same price.
We looked at one property where the estate agents put it on at £145000, now I believe that means around £9000 to the estate agent, the owners seemed offended when we asked them to reduce the price by the fee that they would have to pay to the estate agent.
User avatar
Southerner
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 911
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 7:32 pm
Location: UK/Paphos soon

Postby cyprusgrump » Sun Jan 20, 2008 7:47 am

123456 wrote:Yes of course that's an over-reaction.

I post about how it *appears* that a press release is quoting a figure that does not match the source data and you respond with something along the lines of "*sigh* who cares, it's not important"

BTW I have no idea what you mean with your whole science versus man-made finances angle. I'm talking about the need for objective reporting and analysis and you seem to be concerned about hitting the bold button and emoticons.

Calm down, calm down...

There will always people that believe whatever they are told and others like you (and me) that question it.

Quite frankly, you’ll never convince the former category to join the more enlightened of us (check out BC NUMISMATICS and Quamers for prime examples) so there is little point upsetting yourself about it…
User avatar
cyprusgrump
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 8524
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 4:35 pm
Location: Pissouri, Cyprus

Postby phoenix » Sun Jan 20, 2008 8:09 am

cyprusgrump wrote:
123456 wrote:Yes of course that's an over-reaction.

I post about how it *appears* that a press release is quoting a figure that does not match the source data and you respond with something along the lines of "*sigh* who cares, it's not important"

BTW I have no idea what you mean with your whole science versus man-made finances angle. I'm talking about the need for objective reporting and analysis and you seem to be concerned about hitting the bold button and emoticons.

Calm down, calm down...

There will always people that believe whatever they are told and others like you (and me) that question it.

Quite frankly, you’ll never convince the former category to join the more enlightened of us (check out BC NUMISMATICS and Quamers for prime examples) so there is little point upsetting yourself about it…


It's a matter of priorities. :D

Some question life, you question money. Some care for philosophy, you care for finances.

Anyone who is not aware how statistics can be manipulated, needs to go back to school.

More fascinating than the 3% is the thinking and emotion behind the prompting of this thread.

Who is the enlightened one and who is the money-orientated pleb? :wink:
User avatar
phoenix
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 3452
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 2:47 pm
Location: Free From Forum

Postby cyprusgrump » Sun Jan 20, 2008 8:46 am

phoenix wrote:
cyprusgrump wrote:
123456 wrote:Yes of course that's an over-reaction.

I post about how it *appears* that a press release is quoting a figure that does not match the source data and you respond with something along the lines of "*sigh* who cares, it's not important"

BTW I have no idea what you mean with your whole science versus man-made finances angle. I'm talking about the need for objective reporting and analysis and you seem to be concerned about hitting the bold button and emoticons.

Calm down, calm down...

There will always people that believe whatever they are told and others like you (and me) that question it.

Quite frankly, you’ll never convince the former category to join the more enlightened of us (check out BC NUMISMATICS and Quamers for prime examples) so there is little point upsetting yourself about it…


It's a matter of priorities. :D

Some question life, you question money. Some care for philosophy, you care for finances.

Anyone who is not aware how statistics can be manipulated, needs to go back to school.

More fascinating than the 3% is the thinking and emotion behind the prompting of this thread.

Who is the enlightened one and who is the money-orientated pleb? :wink:

Someone who rushed out and bought a property based on flawed statistical evidence of market growth perhaps? :wink:
User avatar
cyprusgrump
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 8524
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 4:35 pm
Location: Pissouri, Cyprus

Postby phoenix » Sun Jan 20, 2008 9:57 am

cyprusgrump wrote:
phoenix wrote:
cyprusgrump wrote:
123456 wrote:Yes of course that's an over-reaction.

I post about how it *appears* that a press release is quoting a figure that does not match the source data and you respond with something along the lines of "*sigh* who cares, it's not important"

BTW I have no idea what you mean with your whole science versus man-made finances angle. I'm talking about the need for objective reporting and analysis and you seem to be concerned about hitting the bold button and emoticons.

Calm down, calm down...

There will always people that believe whatever they are told and others like you (and me) that question it.

Quite frankly, you’ll never convince the former category to join the more enlightened of us (check out BC NUMISMATICS and Quamers for prime examples) so there is little point upsetting yourself about it…


It's a matter of priorities. :D

Some question life, you question money. Some care for philosophy, you care for finances.

Anyone who is not aware how statistics can be manipulated, needs to go back to school.

More fascinating than the 3% is the thinking and emotion behind the prompting of this thread.

Who is the enlightened one and who is the money-orientated pleb? :wink:

Someone who rushed out and bought a property based on flawed statistical evidence of market growth perhaps? :wink:


..... not necessarily flawed.

Sounds like you were gambling (unaware :? ) and you lost.

Sorry cyprusgrump, hope you have better luck next time. :)
User avatar
phoenix
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 3452
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 2:47 pm
Location: Free From Forum

Postby Sega » Sun Jan 20, 2008 10:05 am

Estate agents and Letting agents alike only care about the end process of which they will be getting paid. The don't care too much about the landlord nor do they care about the seller, they more or less work for the buyers and the tenants and that's why they always stick up for them. The reason I say this is because they only way they can get paid is if one of those people respond.

Personally I would not believe anything they tell you, do your own research and make sure you are 100% correct. Go to more than one estate agent and ask for their advice, look at other sold properties. I am aware this is Cyprus and unfortunately the market is smaller but do it anyway. Then verify and make sure you are right before you proceed. Don't let them set the price, it's your property after all. Their valuation is always under-valued in order to get a quick sale and obtain the associated commission. Let's face it will probably be a few thousand.
User avatar
Sega
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 895
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 10:21 pm

Postby 123456 » Sun Jan 20, 2008 3:18 pm

phoenix wrote:
Some question life, you question money. Some care for philosophy, you care for finances.

Anyone who is not aware how statistics can be manipulated, needs to go back to school.

More fascinating than the 3% is the thinking and emotion behind the prompting of this thread.

Who is the enlightened one and who is the money-orientated pleb? :wink:


OMFG I cannot believe how quick people on this forum are to a) hijack a thread (if you are not interested in the topic then don't post a reply) and b) make wild assumptions about the motives of a user including being so arrogant as to make claims about a users own philosophy and finances!

FYI I have no interest in the property market in Cyprus, I do, however, have an interest in misinformation and propaganda and how they affect the macro-economics of a small society such as Cyprus.

This island, with its tortured history, is riddled with examples of how lies and half-truths go unchallenged day in and day out, often resulting in deepening the divisions between north and south, rich and poor. But nobody seems to care anyway as this thread seems to highlight.

You seem all too quick to make statements about how much purer your philosophical motives are than mine without knowing one jot about me.

A few lines from a Kaiser Chiefs recent song springs to mind about the likes of you:

"We are the angry mob, we read the papers every day, we like who we like and we hate who we hate but we're also easy to sway"

It's about the ignorant masses who allow themselves to be manipulated by media and soundbite and talking heads every day.

So you consider yourself enlightened? LOL.
123456
Member
Member
 
Posts: 52
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 6:10 pm

Previous

Return to General Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests