Anyway, during our conversation I brought up the fact, that sometimes being on the forum is a little bit like the movie
"Twelve Angry Men" and I said to him, sometimes I feel like "Henry Fonda" ( Mr. Davis) trying to bring others to see things through my way. Just to be fair to him, I had also made the claim, that he too can play the part as "Henry Fonda", because he also does the same thing as me. Then it struck me, that I believe we are all acting like "Henry Fonda" in that movie.
So what is my point you are asking.?? None really. I just see us all trying to solve the case regarding peace for Cyprus and that we are all pulling each other different directions, hoping that one of us will manage to persuade the others to believe our version of the truth and accept the outcome. The good news is, the truth had prevailed and the case was closed. So, there's hope for Cyprus yet.!
What other movies can you think of, that in some ways portray what goes on in the Forum with our constant battles and discussions. I'm having a hard time coming up with another movie like the "Twelve Angry Men". Last year I used forum members as characters I thought were ideal to re-make of the movie "Wizard of Oz".
It was a Smash Hit.!!!
Here is a summary what the movie "Twelve Angry Men" is about.
"12 Angry Men" focuses on a jury's deliberations in a capital murder case. A 12-man jury is sent to begin deliberations in the first-degree murder trial of an 18-year-old Latino accused in the stabbing death of his father, where a guilty verdict means an automatic death sentence. The case appears to be open-and-shut: The defendant has a weak alibi; a knife he claimed to have lost is found at the murder scene; and several witnesses either heard screaming, saw the killing or the boy fleeing the scene. Eleven of the jurors immediately vote guilty; only Juror No. 8 (Mr. Davis) casts a not guilty vote. At first Mr. Davis' bases his vote more so for the sake of discussion after all, the jurors must believe beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty. As the deliberations unfold, the story quickly becomes a study of the jurors' complex personalities (which range from wise, bright and empathetic to arrogant, prejudiced and merciless), preconceptions, backgrounds and interactions. That provides the backdrop to Mr. Davis' attempts in convincing the other jurors that a "not guilty" verdict might be appropriate.