1)When the eokas have surrendered all their weapons in 1960 and the GC side was totally armless until 1962, the constant smaggling of weapons by the TC side was to stay alive? Was purely reactionary?
You and I both know they went underground, thats how underhand GCs can be and why we have to be extra careful if we ever decide to unite, plenty of safeguards. Knowing that eoka was regrouping the TCs could not just sit around and wait for their fate their had to prepare and fight back the best way they could.
2)the AT THE BLINK OF AN EYE abandoning of your positions in the parliament just because Makarios has PROPOSED something, which you didn't like was simply reactionary for you to stay alive?
Could you tell me exactly why we left parliament? let see who knows history covering this departure.
3)The massive buying of lands at the North of Nicosia, the kicking out of the Armenians and the few GCs in preparation of enclaves before nothing even happened was for you to stay alive?
Can you provide details of the purchases? dates and who brought these lands?
VP either you don't know what really happened, or you are unable to see the true line of events and their linking, or you are too brainwashed by the Turkish propaganda.
If you would kindly reply to the above questions we will soon find out who is making things up as they go along and knows their hisotry.
Nothing was reactionary in Cyprus not even Taksim Vs Enosis. All these are superficial excuses some people invented. Everything was prepared and thought in advance by each side SEPARATELY for the day the British would LEAVE. It was a clush of ethnic forces each hungrily waiting for the political power to come.
Like it or not without your enosis dream their would never have been Taksim, if you had encouraged Cypriotism, human rights and democracy for all back then you may of had a chance. You had your chance the situation has changed completely and will never be as it was.