The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Once Upon a Time there was an island called Cyprus...

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby zan » Mon Jan 07, 2008 11:10 am

Nikitas wrote:"the fact that you still have control of the Cyprus government because of all those wrong doings and a simple sorry for the actions does not take away the fact of the cause. This you do not want to put right. "

Well Zan, do you mean that if the RoC were to go fully back to the 1960 agreement then Turkey would automatically withdraw its troops, the TRNC would be dissolved and the partition reversed? Or do you mean that we keep the status quo in the north and turn the south into a fully official Republic of Cyprus with the 70-30 arrangment and full TC participation in parliament etc?

You do not clarify what you mean and it this is confusing me, and others I think.




I have just asked Bir the same question but what would you accept and please try to use some common sense as to the outcome and possibilities of what you ask. Perhaps you can also explain the "Keep the status quo in the north" means as well.
User avatar
zan
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 16213
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 8:55 pm

Postby BirKibrisli » Mon Jan 07, 2008 4:00 pm

zan wrote:
Birkibrisli wrote:
Zan wrote:Birkibrisli to Piratis' rescue once again

You started off by telling us that you could only put the TC side of the story and that others should put forward the GC side...Apart from Nikitas, who is more interested in saving face and justifying the GC actions...Who else has ventured an account of what the GCs did. Not a sausage And by you saying that you only know the Turkish side , does that not make your account a little one sided because as these things were going on what were the GCs doing. This whole thead is a waste of time and a blatant attack on the Turkish Cypriot people by you.

You have shown your colours many times Bir and you are doing it again here. You asked for back up to show that the GCs accept their part on all this and you got nothing. You asked for back up again and you still are getting nothing...You clearly believe that the TCs are to blame for everything with your claim that the information is out here...So why don't you find it and post a balanced thread instead of running us into the ground. What does it take for you to realise that these people do not play fair. You have given them the feeling that they are right and we are wrong...As if they needed any encouragement.....Where is your balance.....Why don't you just admit that you hate the TCs and the Turks equally and have done with it. Your house lays in ruin in the "RoC" and still we are to blame. We suffer embargoes at the hands of our killers and still you blame us. hat sort of a man are you??? If you end up living with the likes of Piratis then good...You deserve each other!!!


What happened to my New years Greetings.....I sent you one at that false name you gave me...You know the one..The one that you made up to fool me into thinking you were someone else...Te one that you don't check any more because it was meant just for me.......


Sorry,Zan. I wasn't ignoring you. I was out walking off the excess kilos I put on during the silly season.

Now,Piratis needs no rescueing from anyone,as you know well.

But I am starting to seriously worry about your cognitive processes,as they seem to include many distortions. My whole argument is that in a historical and complex struggle like ours it is impossible for the entire blame to be only on one side... So how can you think that I think all the blame is on the TCs??? :roll:

I am doing what I think is the right thing to do...That is to dig up those facts and historical events which are ignored by our propaganda machine,and try to put things in their true prespective. I believe only if and when we can all see the clear picture and our role in this messy affair,only then can we find a fair and lasting peaceful solution. Not by repeating endlessly accusations based on one-sided half-truths,exaggerations or plain old lies...This applies to both sides. But it is not in my nature to rub other people's noses in their own mistakes. It will be counter productive in any case. Most people on this forum are intelligent enough to know the wrongs done by their side. If they don't choose to air it in public (and Piratis,Pyros,Kifeas,Bananiot,Cypezokyli,miltiades,humanist etc are on the record with their own self-criticisms) it does not mean I have to stop doing what I think is right.

And when will you realise that criticism does not equal hatred? Why should I hate my own kind? My son is half TC half Turkish anyway.Are you suggesting that I hate him every time I pull him up for doing something wrong??

I did not see the need to reply to your new years's greeting because i realised or thought it was generated by the computer. You know my real name so why should you use the name on my email address which is not mine. For your information,I have used a simple precaution and not used my real name when signing up to public forums on the net. But I explained that to you when I gave you my email address,I am sure. Everyone associated with this forum (with one exception you can guess) have that email address for me. So stop being paranoid... :roll:



Really.... :roll: ....You worry about my cognitive process when in one post you say to utu that the "RoC" has hijacked the Cyprus Republic and then here you try to justify their wrong doings. We all know the dirty tricks that went on by both sides and that neither one is a saint but by your actions you are allowing them to get away with our country. You back the likes of Piratis who do not want to give our country back and our rights. They twist and turn with their lies as to why they should hold onto it and you give them encouragement with threads like this. You excuse their ENOSIS claims in which both Makarios and Grivas SWORE an oath for ENOSIS and you then tell me that ENOSIS was dead with the Zurich agreement. You then are unable to follow the reasoning behind their actions to achieve this goal and the first phase involves getting us out of government.....But I will not go on about that here because I am sure you will ignore it again......The fact that your father had such problems with the TMT is all you care about mate and I am sorry about that but that was why I gave you the short reply of "He who lives by the sword". This should have been cancelled out by all those that were killed by EOKA both TC and GC but you hold a grudge against those you fought with and not the ones you fought against. You have the right to be angry with them but not the right to sell your people down the line because of it...Your anger with the TMT is over-riding everything else that you know to be true. ENOSIS was the main factor of all these troubles and whether it exists today or not is not the problem..The problem is they still have our Republic and you are siding with those that do not want to give it back because of some sort of chivalry that you think rubbing their noses in it would demean. DO you want your Republic back or not or is this call for a return to the Zurich agreement just another smoke screen??? DO you honestly believe they are going to give it back with the way Piratis and Kifeas talk.

Your only offer of a solution was " dissolve the TRNC and walk into the "RoC" and demand they let us back into the Cyprus Republic under the Zurich agreement". Do you realise that there is no Cyprus republic and the Zurich agreement has been made null and void by them. Did you not see the many speeches made by various GC leaders to that fact. They did it in 1964 and have denied it ever since to us. So your simplistic approach to the problem is to ask us to allow them to move into their homes and give them full control of the country and put ourselves back into the 3% that they forced us into back in the 60's and start complaining from there and they will see our plight and give us back our rights.....Nice plan govnor.......And you have a problem with my cognitive thinking :roll: :roll: :roll: The whole process of constitution and everything else about Cyprus has to be renegotiated and the fact that that is what has been happening since and they have not given an inch and prefer to hold onto power and through a hasty decision the UN gave them the power to do so is OK by you. :roll:

I think it is high time that you put your demands on the table with the likes of Piratis and see the response you get. I have asked you to write to the "RoC" administration to see what they say to your proposals and give us the answer but you know the result so you will not do it. Give us your final request from the GCs so that they can agree or disagree with you and stop this trying to be all things to all men crap. It would be more useful than this pointless thread in which you are getting no confessions from the GC at all but reasons as to why they are refusing to give us back our Cyprus republic. Then and only then will your cognitive thinking afford you the real picture. Lets have it Bir.......Lets have a discussion on how you are going to get the likes of Tpap to see it your way?????? :roll: :roll:



I do not buy your explanation as to why you did not want to send me, by return, the new years greetings that I sent you. You want to play the saint all the time so a kindly reminder that I got your name mixed up with that on your actual email address would have been the right thing to do would it not. The greeting was not computer generated because it would not have contained any name if it was. I am not that good with computers as I have told you before. But even so...It came from an individual and courtesy dictates that a return of greeting is the way to go. Maybe a little hate got in the way hey!!! Me and Boomers have been taking chunks out of each other for a long time now but he returned my message with heartfelt best wishes and ha earned my respect...Although I secretly liked him anyway regardless of his piss taking abilities.


Zan...I am really sorry about the greeting business. I know less about computers than you do probably. I swear when I saw the wrong name on it,I assumed it was a generic message that you gave the computer to send automatically to all the people in your address book. On principle I never reply to generic messages generated by computers. There is no way in the world I would not return a greeting if I knew it was individually sent. I can only appologise and ask you to trust me on this. Sorry,mate.

The problem I have with you is that you seem to totally lack any empath and compassion for the GCs. You seem unable to go beyond what is written in Denktash's propaganda manuals. You jump on the GC desire for Enosis and use that to justify everything that has happened to them.
Of course it was wrong of them to seek Enosis,but from our perspective only. For them it was a very legitimate demand. For the first time in all their history they had a real chance of deciding their own fate. They were in overwhelming majority,Cyprus was ruled by Britain which was Greece's ally and protector. Why wouldnt they want to unite with the country they considered to be their motherland? If the roles were reversed and we were in the majority by 82% do you think we would say "it would be nice to be reunited with our motherland ,but we won't ask for that because we must consider the feelings of our fellow Cypriots"??? Have you ever considered this? If not ,why not?

And how would you feel if you were forced to share power equally,nay if you were forced to give a relatively small minority more powers than you got yourself??? And you were forced to sign an agreement which would essentially mean the end of your long cherished dream? And you were told this is the best you can get,take it or leave it...

All this does not mean that the TCs deserved the treatment they got from the GCs between 1964-74. The other side of the coin is,the GCs had little regard for the feelings of the TCs while making their dash for Enosis. And they probably had conscious or subconsious desire to punish the TCs for siding with the British,and for being part of the despised former rulers.
And you seem to totally ignore the fact the TCs were ready to jump out of the RoC government when the push came. They were preparing the ground for some time,since the beginning of of 1957, for sure.

You are wrong about the 1960 agreement being null and void. That cannot be done unilaterally. RoC owes its existance to the Zurich and London agreements of 1959. Tpapa gets his legitimacy from the same agreement. And the original Turkish intervention was legitimate under the same agreements. Turkey became an occupying power for failing to carry out her responsibility under the same agreements. And made matters worse by transporting the settlers in contradiction to international agreements. There is nothing stopping Talat to demand the rights of the TCs in the RoC under the 1960 constitution. But he can't have his cake and eat it too. He has to chose between the trnc and the RoC. And the choice is not his,so this is only academic.

The biggest mistake Makarios and the GCs did was not to realise what kind of an opponent they were facing in Denktash. They failed to see that he was not just a Turkish nationalist,he was a Turanist, a pan-Turkist ideolog who would stop at nothing to expand the borders of Turkey,and to unify the Turkic nations under one leader,one flag,one new empire.
Why do you think they got rid of first Faiz kaymak and then Dr Kuchuk to install Denktash???Because the other two were not as fanatical about partition as Denktash was...But we won't go there now.

If we fail to see both sides of the coin,and to consider the events in the time frame they occured,we will never get beyond trying to apportion blame for what happened. My frustration is that I see partition as a disaster for the TCs,self-induced ethnic cleansing and loss of identity and culture. I am essentially trying to wake you,the TCs up. I don't have the time and the energy to put both sides of the coin . If you feel the GCs are not forthcoming with their own admission of mistakes,nothing is stoppping you from filling in the gaps. If you are so certain of your facts just jump in whenever you see something is not "balanced" and state your case. I always said I want this to be a team effort. We will get nothing by shuting up and sweeping everything under the carpet,Zan. You are an intelligent and sensitive person,mate. you can make a great contribution if you approach this in the right spirit. And please stop misrepresenting my ideas. I never sugggested we go back to how things were between 1964-74. I would be bonkers to do so,given my life experiences. I can see only one solution which Cypriots can implement themselves.That is to return to the original RoC,prepared to negotiate the 13 points Makarios wanted to change to make the state more democratic and easier to run,and make another go at creating a nation of Cypriots...
User avatar
BirKibrisli
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6162
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 4:28 pm
Location: Australia

Postby Piratis » Mon Jan 07, 2008 4:37 pm

zan wrote:
Piratis wrote:
Birkibrisli to Piratis' rescue once again

Bir is just stating the obvious.

You started off by telling us that you could only put the TC side of the story and that others should put forward the GC side...Apart from Nikitas, who is more interested in saving face and justifying the GC actions...Who else has ventured an account of what the GCs did. Not a sausage


Zan, we never denied our wrong doings and our share of the blame.

The Generals of the Athens Junta were jailed, same goes for Samson in Cyprus. The actions of EOKA B were officially condemned, the fact that innocent TCs were killed during the intercommunal conflict was never denied.

Now look at your side: Were those Turks that made the invasion jailed? No on the contrary you celebrate it. Were the actions of TMT during the 60s condemned? Again NO. Do you admit that you killed 100s of Greek Cypriots during the intercommunal conflict and 1000s during the invasion? NO again.

What Bir does now is what we did officially many years ago. What more do you want us to say?

Apparently what you would like to be satisfied is nothing less than placing the whole blame on Greek Cypriots so you can label Greek Cypriots as the "evil" ones and you as the "Virgin Mary" and based on that excuse your criminal and illegal occupation of our country that you support today.



What you constantly do is use every excuse you can to justify the the fact that you still have control of the Cyprus government because of all those wrong doings and a simple sorry for the actions does not take away the fact of the cause. This you do not want to put right. This is the all important factor in which you twist and turn in order to hold onto. This is the factor which allows you exaggerate your innocence and claim justice was served. This is the contradiction in your whole idea that the "RoC" is the legal government of Cyprus. If you accept the wrongs then there must be a result of those wrongs and the result you like so you want to keep it.
Read and take in the thread Jerry posted in which nationalism is explained and how the GCs were partly responsible for Turkish Nationalism in the same way they were responsible for the TMT. The "We had a right to ENOSIS" doesn't cut it and you know it but BIr will back you up all the way so don't be alarmed..... :roll: :roll: :roll:


Again, you see only one side. The wrong doings in the 60s where not just from our side. Yet you want us take the whole responsibility for them while you continue to pretend to be the "Virgin Mary".

Either you like it or not Republic of Cyprus is 100% legal and any day you decide to end your illegal occupation you are more than welcome to come back and take your place in RoC instead of pretending that there is some "trnc" on the island.

I accept the share of responsibility that is on our side, and I accept the share of crimes we committed. That share if we look only the period of intercommunal conflict is about 50%-50% between the two communities. If however we add Turkey (and UK) in the equation and the whole history, before and after the intercommunal conflict, then the share of blame of Greek Cypriots is no more than 1%.
So you now coming here to put the whole blame on us in order to excuse yet more crimes against us is ridiculous.

It is time to accept your own share of blame Zan. But if you did that, then it would be like accepting that GCs are not really the "evils" that deserve to be punished, and the TCs the "angels" that deserve to be rewarded on the loss of the "evil" GCs, and that would screw up your whole propaganda, right Zan?
User avatar
Piratis
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 12261
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 11:08 pm

Postby zan » Mon Jan 07, 2008 4:53 pm

Zan...I am really sorry about the greeting business. I know less about computers than you do probably. I swear when I saw the wrong name on it,I assumed it was a generic message that you gave the computer to send automatically to all the people in your address book. On principle I never reply to generic messages generated by computers. There is no way in the world I would not return a greeting if I knew it was individually sent. I can only appologise and ask you to trust me on this. Sorry,mate.

OK fine! I don’t care any more.

The problem I have with you is that you seem to totally lack any empath and compassion for the GCs. You seem unable to go beyond what is written in Denktash's propaganda manuals. You jump on the GC desire for Enosis and use that to justify everything that has happened to them.
Of course it was wrong of them to seek Enosis,but from our perspective only. For them it was a very legitimate demand. For the first time in all their history they had a real chance of deciding their own fate. They were in overwhelming majority,Cyprus was ruled by Britain which was Greece's ally and protector. Why wouldnt they want to unite with the country they considered to be their motherland? If the roles were reversed and we were in the majority by 82% do you think we would say "it would be nice to be reunited with our motherland ,but we won't ask for that because we must consider the feelings of our fellow Cypriots"??? Have you ever considered this? If not ,why not?


Yes I have considered that and you accusing me of having no sympathy for the GCs….Have you been listening to anything I have said…We had a big session of apologising on erolz site and I was the first to say sorry. We had one of those sessions here also and I said it again. I have said sorry for the refugees and the dead and the living…have I left anybody out.

Still in the above you are prepared to provide the excuses for the GCs but not for the reaction that their actions caused. If they had reacted to our call for Taksim if we were the majority then you would still be blaming us. We just can’t win. We had the right also to oppose ENOSIS. You are making up excuses for people that should have known better and should have listened when they were told that your actions will result in war, majority or not. You can’t just take the majority argument and not add into that the fact that Turkey was master for 400 years and that the territorial waters would not be handed over ever, because it would mean the end of Turkey. You are taking this ENOSIS thing at its simplest and not what it hoped to achieve in terms of the Megali idea. Much greater plans for destroying Turkey was at hand mate and you know it. Have you ever considered this. If not why not?

And how would you feel if you were forced to share power equally,nay if you were forced to give a relatively small minority more powers than you got yourself??? And you were forced to sign an agreement which would essentially mean the end of your long cherished dream? And you were told this is the best you can get,take it or leave it...

Long cherished dream???…See above!!

All this does not mean that the TCs deserved the treatment they got from the GCs between 1964-74. The other side of the coin is,the GCs had little regard for the feelings of the TCs while making their dash for Enosis. And they probably had conscious or subconsious desire to punish the TCs for siding with the British,and for being part of the despised former rulers.
And you seem to totally ignore the fact the TCs were ready to jump out of the RoC government when the push came. They were preparing the ground for some time,since the beginning of of 1957, for sure.


I believe that Denktas made a massive mistake in pulling out of government. He did not see what was coming until it was too late. He and Dr. Kucuk were desperate to stop the fighting as soon as they discovered what was the real aim behind the so called inter-communal fighting. They thought that they would cripple the government by pulling out because Makarios was not listening to them and there is proof that I provided that Makarios ignored the vetos.A massive massive mistake that Makarios and Tpap had planned for that gave them the government of the island. All that was left for Makarios to do was to stir the trouble up again and then ask for UN intervention and they would have to recognize the GCs as the government. Do not underestimate this point in time.

You are wrong about the 1960 agreement being null and void. That cannot be done unilaterally. RoC owes its existance to the Zurich and London agreements of 1959. Tpapa gets his legitimacy from the same agreement. And the original Turkish intervention was legitimate under the same agreements. Turkey became an occupying power for failing to carry out her responsibility under the same agreements. And made matters worse by transporting the settlers in contradiction to international agreements. There is nothing stopping Talat to demand the rights of the TCs in the RoC under the 1960 constitution. But he can't have his cake and eat it too. He has to chose between the trnc and the RoC. And the choice is not his,so this is only academic.

Makarios made the Zurich agreement null and void in speech after speech because of the absence of the TC contingent. That is why they will never allow the agreement again. NEVER…Turkey was in talks with the USA when the first phase of the intervention was completed and they asked for the agreement to be e-established. Makarios would not do it so the second phase moved to the border we have today. They put the 13 amendments that they always used as an excuse in the first place, as per the Akritas plan, in the way of any settlement.

The biggest mistake Makarios and the GCs did was not to realise what kind of an opponent they were facing in Denktash. They failed to see that he was not just a Turkish nationalist,he was a Turanist, a pan-Turkist ideolog who would stop at nothing to expand the borders of Turkey,and to unify the Turkic nations under one leader,one flag,one new empire.
Why do you think they got rid of first Faiz kaymak and then Dr Kuchuk to install Denktash???Because the other two were not as fanatical about partition as Denktash was...But we won't go there now.



Really don’t see what else Denktas could have done. I have tried to go over all the events and the intransigence he had to go through, and apart from the one mistake he made with leaving the government, I would have done the same. You seem to conveniently forget that he had two agreements swept from under him.

The boarders of Turkey in Cyprus were already there mate and that went with the territorial waters. There is no way that Turkey can let go of those waters. Turkey has not expanded a single inch since the setting of it’s borders but has defended the ones it had. Not a single inch. Cyprus is not something it can let go and neither can I as a Turkish Cypriot.

If we fail to see both sides of the coin,and to consider the events in the time frame they occured,we will never get beyond trying to apportion blame for what happened. My frustration is that I see partition as a disaster for the TCs,self-induced ethnic cleansing and loss of identity and culture. I am essentially trying to wake you,the TCs up. I don't have the time and the energy to put both sides of the coin . If you feel the GCs are not forthcoming with their own admission of mistakes,nothing is stoppping you from filling in the gaps. If you are so certain of your facts just jump in whenever you see something is not "balanced" and state your case. I always said I want this to be a team effort. We will get nothing by shuting up and sweeping everything under the carpet,Zan. You are an intelligent and sensitive person,mate. you can make a great contribution if you approach this in the right spirit. And please stop misrepresenting my ideas. I never sugggested we go back to how things were between 1964-74. I would be bonkers to do so,given my life experiences. I can see only one solution which Cypriots can implement themselves.That is to return to the original RoC,prepared to negotiate the 13 points Makarios wanted to change to make the state more democratic and easier to run,and make another go at creating a nation of Cypriots...

Your dream could not only see the end of Turkish Cypriots but the end of Turkey too. You have no idea what you are doing mate and you really need to have another go at accessing the situation.

What you also fail to realise is that we have been trying to amend all those 13 points and more but as time goes by those 13 points have become 13,000 points and still rising. How about we solve that little problem first before entering the lions den. I have every sympathy for my GC cousins and even more for those displaced persons that should have received their money long ago when this business came to the point of no return.
Last edited by zan on Mon Jan 07, 2008 5:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
zan
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 16213
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 8:55 pm

Postby Piratis » Mon Jan 07, 2008 5:20 pm

Of course it was wrong of them to seek Enosis,but from our perspective only. For them it was a very legitimate demand. For the first time in all their history they had a real chance of deciding their own fate. They were in overwhelming majority,Cyprus was ruled by Britain which was Greece's ally and protector. Why wouldnt they want to unite with the country they considered to be their motherland? If the roles were reversed and we were in the majority by 82% do you think we would say "it would be nice to be reunited with our motherland ,but we won't ask for that because we must consider the feelings of our fellow Cypriots"??? Have you ever considered this? If not ,why not?

And how would you feel if you were forced to share power equally,nay if you were forced to give a relatively small minority more powers than you got yourself??? And you were forced to sign an agreement which would essentially mean the end of your long cherished dream? And you were told this is the best you can get,take it or leave it...


Bir, again you are just stating the obvious that some people seem unwilling (not unable) to understand.

Cyprus was under foreign rulers for centuries with a great majority of Greek speaking population. This was not unlike the many other Greek islands and territories. Of course Cypriots wanted to finally be liberated. And liberation at that time meant becoming part of the Greek state. In the 50s there were no independent islands in the Mediterranean (out of the 100s of islands in the Mediterranean Cyprus was the first to become independent in 1960 and Malta the second and last in 1964). Liberation = Enosis at that time, and no alternative was given. In fact it was Makarios the first one to propose independence in 1959, and of course he meant a real independence, not what they gave us.

Also it has to be said that in 1955 when the EOKA struggle started the target was not Turkish Cypriots. The target were the British and Greek Cypriots that EOKA suspected that they were traitors (and possibly Grivas used EOKA to take out some GC communists as well)

The conflict between GCs and TCs didn't start until 1957 when TMT was formed and clearly with a help by the British who wanted their divide and rule and pass to the next level.

While the struggle of GCs for union with Greece was legitimate one at the same time I 100% understand the very real fears that TCs had due to what had previously happened to Turkish minorities in Greece (and Greek minorities in Turkey). So I do not blame TCs for siding with the colonialists to defeat our aim of enosis. If I was a TC I would probably do the same.

A true independance with a true democracy would be the ideal solution that would give to Cypriots their freedom and self-determination without granting Enosis for which TCs had valid fears about. Such true independence and true democracy would guarantee the smooth functioning of the Cyprus state, would make Cypriots appreciate the benefits of independence, and would make the small minorities of extremists that existed in both sides ineffective in their efforts to push their own agenda.

Unfortunately what was forced on us was only a partial independence with foreign countries maintaining troops and control over our country. Also the constitution officially divided the Cypriot people between GCs and TCs (ala Ottoman rule), giving to the TC minority way too many gains on the loss of the rest of Cypriots (ala Ottoman rule again) in order to reinforce the unstable, polarized environment that was ripe for more conflicts.
User avatar
Piratis
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 12261
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 11:08 pm

Postby Nikitas » Mon Jan 07, 2008 5:30 pm

A very well laid out overall picture of Cyprus's recent history Piratis.

Now wait for the usual responses.
Nikitas
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 7420
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 2:49 pm

Postby Eric dayi » Mon Jan 07, 2008 5:32 pm

Birkibrisli wrote:
Eric Dayi wrote:No need to go back Bir, your last reply is enough to call you a liar and I have read enough of your posts in the past to know what a liar you are and that you always put the blame on us TCs. Even in your last reply your answer to question number 4 you put the blame on us TCs.

You answered Yes to the GCs wanting ENOSIS but No, to their attempts to genocide us TC knowing full well that had they had the opportunity they would have killed every single TC or chased us off the island, again you lied about this fact.

You even said "We had no excuse to be part of the destruction of our own independent state." again putting the blame on us but refused to give an explanation of what we TCs should have done instead.

You also claimed that ENOSIS was ruled out in the 1960 agreement but never gave an explanation why the Greeks and Greek Cypriots together started an ENOSIS war and attempted to genocide us for their dream.

You are stuck up the creek without a paddle Bir and are trying to divert attention from your latest lies, but same as every other trick your masters tried this has also backfired in your face/s.

Like I said Bir, I will at every opportunity you give us remind you and everyone else what a liar you are.


My God,Eric...You are worse than Zan with your cognitive distortions. :lol:

Just because you state an opinion not supported by any facts does not make that opinion true...And people who do not share that opinion cannot be called liars...Back to the drawing board,my good friend. Show me one proof that anything I say in my narratives are lies...
I have another question for you...Do you know how many people were killed during the EOKA's armed struggle for Enosis between 1955 and 59?
And how many were British,TC,GC etc???? go and find the numbers and come and tell me if they support your assertions... :)


Like a true moron you keep on spewing up garbage and crap Bir, all you do is lie and try to hide your lies by lying more and asking stupid questions that only an idiot like you can ask without reading and understanding what I write.

The facts are there you idiot, you yourself admitted that the GCs wanted ENOSIS and we both know that they would have stopped at nothing to achieve it but your great love for anything Greek and your hate for anything Turkish will not let you admit it.

All I can say is that thank Gd that you are 8 thousand miles away and can't do any real harm in the TRNC, all you can do here is spew your crap to a small audience of TCs whom not all agree with you.

It's not numbers that count you moron, it's what they tried to do that counts and what they tried to do is known by the whole world, why otherwise do you think that they are on their own without any support apart from Greece who in the first place was their partner in crime when both the GCs and Greeks tried to genocide us TCs? Why do you think no one is forcing us TCs to surrender or give up the TRNC and return to the 1960 agreement? Why was Turkey allowed to carry out it's peace operation in 1974 and why isn't anyone demanding Turkey pulls it's troops out of Cyprus?

Bir, you are as big a moron as kick-a-poo and have decided to sell out your own people, there are no worse people than those who sell out their own people. You are the lowest of the lowest scum known to mankind and I hope that should a war break out again in Cyprus that both you and Kick-a-poo are in the GC side at the time then you'll see who your friends are and who will put a knife or bullet in your guts without even twitching an eyelid.
User avatar
Eric dayi
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2024
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2005 9:37 pm

Postby Piratis » Mon Jan 07, 2008 5:39 pm

You can’t just take the majority argument and not add into that the fact that Turkey was master for 400 years and that the territorial waters would not be handed over ever


This just shows the mentality of people like Zan. Not an inch of Cyprus belongs to Turkey my friend. If they had ruled Cyprus against our will and oppressed us for 400 years then what Turks should be doing today would be apologizing for the hardships and suffering they have caused to us, not still think that we are their slaves and that they can own us and our island. The territorial waters of Turkey is 6 or at most 12 miles around the Turkish mainland. Cyprus has its own territory and its own territorial waters and Turkey has no right to expand against us.

I have every sympathy for my GC cousins and even more for those displaced persons that should have received their money long ago when this business came to the point of no return.


Our homeland of 3500 years is not for sale mate. But if that way of solving the problem is fine with you then we would be glad to buy all your properties in Cyprus and then you can move out of the island and problem solved. What do you think about my "sympathetic" proposal?

After all the total number of TCs is less than the number of GC refugees. Plus we are richer and therefore more able to buy your land than you are able to buy our. So it makes this proposal more feasible than yours ;)
User avatar
Piratis
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 12261
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 11:08 pm

Postby zan » Mon Jan 07, 2008 5:47 pm

Piratis wrote:
Of course it was wrong of them to seek Enosis,but from our perspective only. For them it was a very legitimate demand. For the first time in all their history they had a real chance of deciding their own fate. They were in overwhelming majority,Cyprus was ruled by Britain which was Greece's ally and protector. Why wouldnt they want to unite with the country they considered to be their motherland? If the roles were reversed and we were in the majority by 82% do you think we would say "it would be nice to be reunited with our motherland ,but we won't ask for that because we must consider the feelings of our fellow Cypriots"??? Have you ever considered this? If not ,why not?

And how would you feel if you were forced to share power equally,nay if you were forced to give a relatively small minority more powers than you got yourself??? And you were forced to sign an agreement which would essentially mean the end of your long cherished dream? And you were told this is the best you can get,take it or leave it...


Bir, again you are just stating the obvious that some people seem unwilling (not unable) to understand.

Cyprus was under foreign rulers for centuries with a great majority of Greek speaking population. This was not unlike the many other Greek islands and territories. Of course Cypriots wanted to finally be liberated. And liberation at that time meant becoming part of the Greek state. In the 50s there were no independent islands in the Mediterranean (out of the 100s of islands in the Mediterranean Cyprus was the first to become independent in 1960 and Malta the second and last in 1964). Liberation = Enosis at that time, and no alternative was given. In fact it was Makarios the first one to propose independence in 1959, and of course he meant a real independence, not what they gave us.

Also it has to be said that in 1955 when the EOKA struggle started the target was not Turkish Cypriots. The target were the British and Greek Cypriots that EOKA suspected that they were traitors (and possibly Grivas used EOKA to take out some GC communists as well)

The conflict between GCs and TCs didn't start until 1957 when TMT was formed and clearly with a help by the British who wanted their divide and rule and pass to the next level.

While the struggle of GCs for union with Greece was legitimate one at the same time I 100% understand the very real fears that TCs had due to what had previously happened to Turkish minorities in Greece (and Greek minorities in Turkey). So I do not blame TCs for siding with the colonialists to defeat our aim of enosis. If I was a TC I would probably do the same.

A true independance with a true democracy would be the ideal solution that would give to Cypriots their freedom and self-determination without granting Enosis for which TCs had valid fears about. Such true independence and true democracy would guarantee the smooth functioning of the Cyprus state, would make Cypriots appreciate the benefits of independence, and would make the small minorities of extremists that existed in both sides ineffective in their efforts to push their own agenda.

Unfortunately what was forced on us was only a partial independence with foreign countries maintaining troops and control over our country. Also the constitution officially divided the Cypriot people between GCs and TCs (ala Ottoman rule), giving to the TC minority way too many gains on the loss of the rest of Cypriots (ala Ottoman rule again) in order to reinforce the unstable, polarized environment that was ripe for more conflicts.


The usual response Nikitas is, that even though you know the results you still stick your heads in the sand and hope that it will all go away. The same rubbish you give us about how we don't exist. :roll: :roll: :roll: You have a partner in Cyprus and that is us...We can live as two equal entities or you can drown in the sand......Your crap will not be tolerated.
User avatar
zan
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 16213
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 8:55 pm

Postby Piratis » Mon Jan 07, 2008 5:53 pm

We can live as equal citizens of one democratic country with no racist discriminations and respect to the human rights of all, or you can drown in the sand......Your crap will not be tolerated.
User avatar
Piratis
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 12261
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 11:08 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests