zan wrote:boomerang wrote:zan wrote:boomerang wrote:zan wrote:boomerang wrote:zan wrote:boomerang wrote:zan wrote:boomerang wrote:zan wrote:phoenix wrote:zan wrote:What a contradiction.......How come the statement says that the Dentas/Makarios agreement existed but Denktas didn't want a solution.....There was an agreement for gods sake Makarios died just before they signed it so there would have been a solution had he lived.
Here take a look at Piratis's excellent definitions of solution and agreement:Piratis wrote:Bananiot, confuses an agreement with a solution.
The two not only are not necessarily the same but they can be opposite.
In order for an agreement and a solution to mean the same thing it would mean that the agreement would actually solve the problem.
The Annan plan solved the problem that TCs had and then some. So they voted "yes" to it. But not only it didn't solve our problem, but it made it bigger, so we voted "no" to it. Simple really.
I guess it all depends on what each ones problem is. If for example you don't care much about Cyprus as a whole and you have property in that 7% that maybe would be returned, then maybe you would gamble your country, and if you were lucky and you got back that property of yours then you would sell it as fast as possible and move out of Cyprus before everything collapses.
However that kind of gamble is a possibility only among a minority of people, and above all most Cypriots care about their country as a whole and would not like themselves and their children to grow up in an undemocratic, unstable and bankrupt Banana Republic.
Instead of having 2/3rd of Cyprus as a bankrupt "constiduent state" without an international voice and with the rest 1/3rd of Cyprus officially Turkified, we would rather have 2/3rd of Cyprus as the free part of a real state, which is economically sound, democratic and with an international voice, while at the same time maintaining our rights over the other 1/3rd of our island, something which will have a very real value when the balance of power will change.
A banana is the main course for a monkey!!!!
so zan what you having for desert then?
You walked into that one with both eyes open did you Boomers.......The answer is a banana of course......See if you can work it out this time....
I quoted it just in case other people are reading it
YOU got owned big time with this one zan and you know it
What is it with you guys...You, GR and Phoenix all seem to have this need to boast of a victory when there simply isn't one there. I call you a monkey and you say "No you are e monkey" and that is your idea of a witty repartee?????If it is mate hen I will give you more pleasure by calling you a dingbat..........Think before you answer.......You call me a ?????
Maybe just maybe you should think in what you say in a post...you made a statement and you got pounded upon....
You didn't call anyone a monkey, you made a statement...and left yourself wide open...
PS...I quoted this one as well...
Did I not say well done.......Cyprus problem solved with your great retort.... Man!!!! I thought you could do better than that Boomers....We have had better and longer ones than that but for some reason this one has made your day....I really can't see it mate but well done anyway...
What the hell are you babbling on about Zan?
Well! You started talking shit so I thought I would join you.....Well Done!!!!
finished your desert yet?...
No!! Still waiting for you to finish your first course.......Can you see where we started Boomers.......Nope????I think you just dropped a clanger.......Main course for monkeys.....
Still swinging?...
Ps...anyway another thread bites the dust