Re QAMERSLAND’S reply:
“I had told you that it was for that time when the slavery were very common and it does not apply to housemaids in the present time. Islam encourages to marry and give all rights as wife then have sexual relationship not as in western world. Go to a pub or disco or cabaret and get girl and have sexual relationship and pay her for using her body. I had posted all how Muslims should treat there salves if they have but I think you didn’t read it. Islam encourages to free slaves and I had challenged you to find me a single verse from Qur'an which says that Muslims should keep slaves or it encourages slavery but you failed and started to ask other questions. In the same time others come and engaged me in some other questions and then you come back after many days to ask the same question.
I hope it is the answer of your question and you will not remember after many days again that you asked me the question and I didn't answer.”
Thank you. You have finally adopted a position and are prepared to say that “it [the concept of a “right-hand possession”] does not apply to housemaids in the present time”. I am sorry, but I have repeatedly asked this question and this is the first time you have given a straight answer.
This leads me on to a number of questions.
When citizen of the Philippines Flora Del Mindanao, who worked as a housemaid in Saudi Arabia, was serially raped by her employer over a period of four years, her employer justified this act on the grounds that, as his housemaid, she was his “right-hand possession” and he was thus entitled to treat her as a sex slave. His opinion must carry some weight, because her employer was an Imam and the leader of an influential madrassa (Islamic school). You have contradicted this Imam’s view with your above statement. In a previous post you have tried to paint Saudi Arabia as a crime-free paradise and shining beacon of what Islam has to deliver. In fact, modern-day Saudi Arabia is a country in which the most basic of human rights are trampled on every day and in a systematic manner. Foreign housemaids suffer serial rape by their employers and then they are punished with floggings and imprisonment if they become pregnant while the rapists go scot-free. Boys as young as three or four are purchased in poor countries and are strapped on to the backs of camels, supposedly acting as as “camel jockeys”. Members of the Saudi royal family keep large harems of sex slaves. Slave markets continue to operate in Saudi cities, where captives are brought in from places like Somalia and Sudan and sold. Saudi Arabia, far from being a shining beacon of light, is a huge cancer right at the centre of Islam. People like you, far from condoning or ignoring these things, should take a principled stand and condemn them. Then I might begin to have some respect for their views. Until such time, they come across to me as total hypocrites. Put your own house in order first, and then come preaching to people like me!
Please do not repeat the argument about judging Islam by the acts of Muslims. These are not just the acts of a few criminals. Sharia law systematically condones and permits these abuses. If you do not believe that Sharia law is being correctly applied in a country like Saudi Arabia, the onus is on you to explain why, and to tell us how it is supposed to operate. You refuse to do this.
I have previously quoted the views of Abdurrahman Wahid, who was president of Indonesia from 1999-2001, about the way his country’s nationals are treated in Saudi Arabia. Wahid, by the way, is an expert in Islamic law and once taught at the Faculty of Islamic Beliefs and Practice at Hasyim Asyari University.
His comment was:
"The Saudi people still believe in
the old Islamic teaching, which is belief in slavery. So a woman who works
for them is considered a slave."
If this Islamic scholar can condemn the practice of slavery in Saudi Arabia, why can’t you?
Let’s turn to your point about what the Quran and hadith have to say about slavery. You say:
“I had posted all how Muslims should treat there salves if they have but I think you didn’t read it.”
I am sorry, but I both read your post and REPLIED to it, quoting from the Quran and hadith. Who isn’t reading whose posts? Please do not insult my intelligence. I have read every post you have made, and have given reasoned answers backed up with sources. It is you who doesn’t read what I write and fails to answer.
In a post you made on 17 June, you say:
“For bible i agree because bible was just for that particular time period and specific people but Quran is for all times.”
This is the Islamic position. The Quran is the literal word of God as revealed through Muhammad. Islam is the final and true religion, and its precepts will apply for the rest of time until judgement day. As such, the word of God as revealed in the Quran must have universal application to all of mankind.
As I have already shown, God in the Quran makes frequent reference to the concept of “right-hand possession:
4:3
If ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly with the orphans, Marry women of your choice, Two or three or four; but if ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly (with them), then only one, or (a captive) that your right hands possess, that will be more suitable, to prevent you from doing injustice.
4:24
Also (prohibited are) women already married, except those whom your right hands possess: Thus hath Allah ordained (Prohibitions) against you: Except for these, all others are lawful, provided ye seek (them in marriage) with gifts from your property,- desiring chastity, not lust, seeing that ye derive benefit from them, give them their dowers (at least) as prescribed; but if, after a dower is prescribed, agree Mutually (to vary it), there is no blame on you, and Allah is All-knowing, All-wise.
4:25
If any of you have not the means wherewith to wed free believing women, they may wed believing girls from among those whom your right hands possess: And Allah hath full knowledge about your faith. Ye are one from another: Wed them with the leave of their owners, and give them their dowers, according to what is reasonable: They should be chaste, not lustful, nor taking paramours: when they are taken in wedlock, if they fall into shame, their punishment is half that for free women. This (permission) is for those among you who fear sin; but it is better for you that ye practise self-restraint. And Allah is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful.
16:71
Allah has bestowed His gifts of sustenance more freely on some of you than on others: those more favoured are not going to throw back their gifts to those whom their right hands possess, so as to be equal in that respect. Will they then deny the favours of Allah.
23: 5 and 6
Who abstain from sex,
Except with those joined to them in the marriage bond, or (the captives) whom their right hands possess,- for (in their case) they are free from blame,
24:58
O ye who believe! let those whom your right hands possess, and the (children) among you who have not come of age ask your permission (before they come to your presence), on three occasions: before morning prayer; the while ye doff your clothes for the noonday heat; and after the late-night prayer: these are your three times of undress: outside those times it is not wrong for you or for them to move about attending to each other: Thus does Allah make clear the Signs to you: for Allah is full of knowledge and wisdom.
30:28
He does propound to you a similitude from your own (experience): do ye have partners among those whom your right hands possess, to share as equals in the wealth We have bestowed on you? Do ye fear them as ye fear each other? Thus do we explain the Signs in detail to a people that understand.
33:50
O Prophet! We have made lawful to thee thy wives to whom thou hast paid their dowers; and those whom thy right hand possesses out of the prisoners of war whom Allah has assigned to thee; and daughters of thy paternal uncles and aunts, and daughters of thy maternal uncles and aunts, who migrated (from Makka) with thee; and any believing woman who dedicates her soul to the Prophet if the Prophet wishes to wed her;- this only for thee, and not for the Believers (at large); We know what We have appointed for them as to their wives and the captives whom their right hands possess;- in order that there should be no difficulty for thee. And Allah is Oft- Forgiving, Most Merciful.
33:55
There is no blame (on these ladies if they appear) before their fathers or their sons, their brothers, or their brother’s sons, or their sisters’ sons, or their women, or the (slaves) whom their right hands possess. And, (ladies), fear Allah. for Allah is Witness to all things.
70: 29 and 30
And those who guard their chastity,
Except with their wives and the (captives) whom their right hands possess,- for (then) they are not to be blamed,
So, the onus is on those who chose to proselytise Islam as the true message for all of mankind for all time what the relevance of this concept is for people living in modern, civilised, secular countries in which slavery has long since been abolished. You could of course argue that the precepts of Islam were progressive in their day, but have since become anachronistic. However, this argument is invalidated by the claim that Islam has universal application. You could argue, as many Gulf Arabs still do, that slavery is justified under Islam and they thus have every right to continue to practise it. You have closed this line of argument by rejecting the notion that foreign housemaids in Saudi Arabia can be classified as “right-hand possessions”. So, what is the relevance of this concept for humanity in an age in which slavery has been abolished in all civilised countries?
You say “Islam encourages to free slaves”. Correct. There are many hadith which exhort Muslims to free slaves and treat them well. However, the basic premise is that the institution of slavery exists and is acceptable. You are exhorted to free your slave; you are not required to do so.
Let’s turn your question “I had challenged you to find me a single verse from Qur'an which says that Muslims should keep slaves or it encourages slavery” round. I challenge you to find a single verse from the Quran or a hadith which PROHIBITS Muslims from keeping slaves. You can not. The supposition that runs through the Quran and hadith is that slavery is acceptable and will always exist. Surely the exhortation to “treat your slaves well” implies that it is OK to keep slaves.
So, maybe the Imam who raped his housemaid was right after all. Perhaps Sharia law really does permit the keeping of sex slaves.