by Piratis » Sat Dec 29, 2007 1:46 pm
Bananiot, confuses an agreement with a solution.
The two not only are not necessarily the same but they can be opposite.
In order for an agreement and a solution to mean the same thing it would mean that the agreement would actually solve the problem.
The Annan plan solved the problem that TCs had and then some. So they voted "yes" to it. But not only it didn't solve our problem, but it made it bigger, so we voted "no" to it. Simple really.
I guess it all depends on what each ones problem is. If for example you don't care much about Cyprus as a whole and you have property in that 7% that maybe would be returned, then maybe you would gamble your country, and if you were lucky and you got back that property of yours then you would sell it as fast as possible and move out of Cyprus before everything collapses.
However that kind of gamble is a possibility only among a minority of people, and above all most Cypriots care about their country as a whole and would not like themselves and their children to grow up in an undemocratic, unstable and bankrupt Banana Republic.
Instead of having 2/3rd of Cyprus as a bankrupt "constiduent state" without an international voice and with the rest 1/3rd of Cyprus officially Turkified, we would rather have 2/3rd of Cyprus as the free part of a real state, which is economically sound, democratic and with an international voice, while at the same time maintaining our rights over the other 1/3rd of our island, something which will have a very real value when the balance of power will change.