Metecyp wrote: I'm not sure if the name change from Avrupa to Afrika was a court ruling. I read Sener Levent every day and I remember him saying how they changed the name to Africa as a reaction to the officials as they thought officials are trying to make north Cyprus an African country by restricting freedom of speech.
No no no. They had to close down because otherwise they had to pay a tremendous fine they could not afford. It seems they were protected as a "limited liability" company (Ltd) similar to the SPA in Italy or "Societe Anonyme" (SA) in France, which allows the closing down of a company by confescating all financial and immovable property of the Company, but not any private property of the individual shareholders.
So they set a new newspaper called "Africa" in reaction to their technical closing down.
wrote: What about bombing Nicos Anastasiadis' (sorry if misspelled) house? I also hear both in this forum and in the GC media how some people are labelled as "traitors" because they don't agree with the official opinion. Or what about that GC documentary maker who made a documentary about TC massacres in Atlilar-Murataga-Sandallar? He couldn't find a single TV channel in the south to show his documentary. Are all these part of being democratic?
So the fact that someone put a grenade outside Anastasiades house, the fact that some people were verbally called traitors (but never brought to justice) and the fact that someone else could not find a channel to present his documentary makes the country undemocratic?
I think the first can be attributed to any reason, the second to freedom of speach, and the third to freedom of choice. Am I oblidged to show every documentary someone makes?
By the way did you hear the whole story about that guy? He was unemployed and simply made that documentary to blackmail, CyBC to hire him!.
To be honest with you our society is not liberal, it is conservative.But certainly this does not mean is un- democratic.