Cyprus-Forum.com

[boomerang]

So in essence what this article is saying is that the world today is ready to accept a new state build on ethnic cleansing...

Can anyone out there please point me to the UN or any other body that endorses these views...

Recognition of the "RoC" as the sole government in Cyprus.........Case in progress.

You are not answering the question Zan...Has anyone came out to recognise ETHNIC CLEANSING as the norm?

It's not rocket science man...its either yes or a no...

You fining it hard to understand Boomers YES YES YES is the answer...You ethnically cleans us and got it so it must be the norm.........

You cannot be ethnically cleansed from somewhere if you are free to come and go with only the usual passport / visa controls. The only thing stopping you moving to the RoC Zan is your mind

However you are sicker than I thought if you dismiss the 200,000 GC refugees that are prevented from returning to the north by your 40,000 Turkish soldiers who would shoot them dead without a moments hesitation.
Merry Christmas

The troops are there to protect the TCs from the barbaric Greeks. Remember 63 and 74?

ETHNICALLY CLEANSED means you cannot go back...the tcs can ask for their land anytime...on the other hand the 40,000 troops are not allowing the people to go back to their homes...because they ETHNICALLY CLEANSED them in the first place...you see the difference?

[zan]

So in essence what this article is saying is that the world today is ready to accept a new state build on ethnic cleansing...

Can anyone out there please point me to the UN or any other body that endorses these views...

Recognition of the "RoC" as the sole government in Cyprus.........Case in progress.

You are not answering the question Zan...Has anyone came out to recognise ETHNIC CLEANSING as the norm?

It's not rocket science man...its either yes or a no...

You fining it hard to understand Boomers YES YES YES is the answer...You ethnically cleans us and got it so it must be the norm.........

You cannot be ethnically cleansed from somewhere if you are free to come and go with only the usual passport / visa controls. The only thing stopping you moving to the RoC Zan is your mind

However you are sicker than I thought if you dismiss the 200,000 GC refugees that are prevented from returning to the north by your 40,000 Turkish soldiers who would shoot them dead without a moments hesitation.
Merry Christmas

The troops are there to protect the TCs from the barbaric Greeks. Remember 63 and 74?

ETHNICALLY CLEANSED means you cannot go back...the tcs can ask for their land anytime...on the other hand the 40,000 troops are not allowing the people to go back to their homes...because they ETHNICALLY CLEANSED them in the first place...you see the difference?

What is the matter with you people...Don't you listen to anything that we ell you...You are so brain washed and refuse to listen to anything but what your corrupt papers tell you Many, including my sisters neighbor, have asked for their homes back and they have been refused subject to a solution....The rest have been appropriated....Wake up...Your stupidity is not helping any unification attempts....For gods sake...

[boomerang]

then how do you explain the tcs that got their houses back and living happily in the RoC?

The RoC is making sure there is no double dipping, unless this is what you got in mind in the first place...we discussed this already

[zan]

then how do you explain the tcs that got their houses back and living happily in the RoC?

The RoC is making sure there is no double dipping, unless this is what you got in mind in the first place...we discussed this already

Boomers...Politics dictate hat a certain amount of seemingly good will existed for you to get into the EU. Only a certain amount though

[utu]

There have been cases of ethnic cleansing both endorsed (post WW2 with ethnic PRE-WAR Germans removed from Eastern Europe), and passively accepted (Ethnic Indians removed from former British Colonies in Africa such as Uganda).

[Kikapu]

There have been cases of ethnic cleansing both endorsed (post WW2 with ethnic PRE-WAR Germans removed from Eastern Europe), and passively accepted (Ethnic Indians removed from former British Colonies in Africa such as Uganda).

There are also executions for rendering punishment just South of you in the USA, which does not exists in Canada. So what is your point "utu", should we have executions in Canada because a precedence has already been set in the USA.???

[utu]

There have been cases of ethnic cleansing both endorsed (post WW2 with ethnic PRE-WAR Germans removed from Eastern Europe), and passively accepted (Ethnic Indians removed from former British Colonies in Africa such as Uganda).

There are also executions for rendering punishment just South of you in the USA, which does not exists in Canada. So what is your point "utu", should we have executions in Canada because a precedence has already been set in the USA.???

I'm just pointing out pertinent information, "Kikapu". FYI, I oppose capital punishment.

[humanist]

hang the bastards I say

[Kikapu]

There have been cases of ethnic cleansing both endorsed (post WW2 with ethnic PRE-WAR Germans removed from Eastern Europe), and passively accepted (Ethnic Indians removed from former British Colonies in Africa such as Uganda).

There are also executions for rendering punishment just South of you in the USA, which does not exists in Canada. So what is your point "utu", should we have executions in Canada because a precedence has already been set in the USA.???

I'm just pointing out pertinent information, "Kikapu". FYI, I oppose capital punishment.

Actually, that was not the question, but happy to hear it anyway.

I hope you oppose Ethnic Cleansing also.!!

[utu]

Kikapu, I do oppose it. It is worth noting though that after World War 2, the Eastern European states expelled not only the German settlers who the Nazis brought in, but also those ethnic Germans who were there before the Nazis came to power. The Sudeten Germans of Czechoslovakia come to mind. The rationale is that these countries who suffered under the Nazis would no longer have the proverbial 'gun to the head' in case Germany ever became agressive again. This policy was approved by the United Nations. Is this an acceptable variant of Ethnic Cleansing?

The removal of ethnic Indians from newly independent African Nations was sanctioned by the old Organization of African Unity (now the African Union) as "removing a legacy of colonialism". It mattered not that most of them were third or fourth generation from the original Indians brought in by the British. If you were not African, out you went. Is the philosophy of ethnic cleansing applied in post-colonial Africa similarly acceptable?