boomerang wrote:Is that how you and your friends interpreted, you are a poor excuse of a blowjob? ...hmmmm...you did say you passed your whatever "o" levels didn't you?
try again and get back to me...this time with no fishies swimming in your mouth
Viewpoint wrote:Kifeas wrote:Viewpoint wrote:humanist wrote:The question to the proud Turkish speaking Cypriot remains what are your views on soon becoming a minority in your own country?
These people are our origins, which is Turkish...our Cypriot brothers tried to stab us in the back, all Turkey has done for us is put food on our plates, she not only protects us but supports us financially, you do not bite the hand that feeds you humanist. People who choose to live in the TRNC and become citizens are my people regardless of their ethnic origins, as long as they abide by our laws and respect each other we have no problems.
Can you see or understand the difference? The Turks have supported us in every way possible whereas GCs have only tired to sell us out to Greece isolate, discriminate and persecute us for being TCs.
VP, I have a proposal to make to you, which I am sure every other GC and our leadership will accept without any problems or objections.
The proposal is the following:
1.] We agree that the Turkish troops withdraw to the 18.4% of Cyprus and the maximum 25% of the coastlines, and the remaining 17.6% of the now occupied areas will pass to the control of the UN, with a resolution guaranteed under chapter 7 of the UN Charter.
2.] There will be no forceful movement or expulsion of TC population from these areas, nor there will be any GC re-settlement into these areas, out of which the Turkish troops will withdraw.
3.] We will negotiate for a fixed term of one year, so that we examine the prospects of reaching a re-unification solution on the basis of a BBF.
4.] We agree that after the end of this one year time-table (I know you like this word) for negotiations, if there is still no agreement between the two communities for re-unification, we will close the re-unification chapter, call the quits and both sides accept recognized partition, simultaneously with the return by the UN to the RoC of the areas which will be in its control since 1 year earlier.
5.] Those TCs residing in the areas that will be returned by the UN to the RoC, will have an option to either stay as RoC citizens that they are, under a revised constitution on the basis of one man one vote -i.e. without separate TC communal rights; or they will have the right to move into the 18.4% of the areas which will form the recognized independed TC state ("TRNC.")
6.] The international community will provide funding for the re-settlement of these people, as well as for any compensation to GCs that will permanently lose their properties situated inside the recognized "TRNC!"
7.] The RoC will agree not to have any saying or objections to your membership as a separate country into any international organization or into the EU.
How do you find such an agreement, would you and the leadership of your community agree to it, and if not, please explain why?
Any other TC is free to express their opinion of the above, within the framework of the above questions placed for VP to answer.
Kifeas I applaud your vision and agree with the timetable put forward which with our past history of negotiation skills is vital to reaching an outcome.
Where I do have a problem is the 18% which as you know is disputed by the TCs, why not have an independent board of experts examine all claims and decide how correct this figure exactly is, if found in your favor then we would have to abide, if not then you would have to accept the outcome. Why not also allow for GCs who wish to live in the TRNC that right? this would also increase the size of the north.
Why not also allow for GCs who wish to live in the TRNC that right? this would also increase the size of the north
I found this statement below by you very interesting. Were you really serious when you made that comment or just having fun.
Why would any GC's would want to come and live under a "foreign" laws in their own country by moving to the "TRNC", so that greater area would fall under it's jurisdiction. It would be much easier and cheaper for the "TRNC" to keep as little land as possible and allow the GC's to return back to their villages, so that they can be under the laws that they have been used to.
Those that do move to the "TRNC", what guarantee would they receive, that they will be able to pass on their property to their families and will not be forced to sell it to TC's only. Since the AP had similar guidelines, so what's to stop you from doing the same if all the refugees came to live under your rules. Within a generation, all the GC land will fall into the hands of the "TRNC".
Just for my interest, since you don't mind having the 18% land and 25% coastline for the "TRNC", just exactly from where to where would you draw the "Partition Line". If you know, please share with us.
Kifeas wrote:Viewpoint wrote: Serious as that was why 29% was always a ball park figure and always agreed by both sides.
???
What does that mean?
Viewpoint wrote:Kifeas wrote:Viewpoint wrote: Serious as that was why 29% was always a ball park figure and always agreed by both sides.
???
What does that mean?
Im serious about allowing those GCs back that wish to live under TC administration, this woudl increase the land distribution figure to a figure that has always been put forward and agreed 29%.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests