Piratis wrote:You took a document and you created a whole propaganda around it to justify things that can not be justified. The invasion was illegal, the occupation is illegal, the "TRNC" is illegal. These are the facts, and they do not change because some people at some time wrote something on a paper.
Just out of curiosity: Did the Turkish defense in the Titina Loizidou case bring up the "Akritas plan" to justify the illegal actions of Turkey? I doubt. Because even Turks themselves know that documents do not give them the right to violate our human rights.
I do not use the Akritas plan to justify any action of TC and Turkey. I use it for what it is - an inditment of those GC that wrote, read or supported it's objectives and means without even knowing of it's existance. I use it for what it is - a document that show true GC desires of the time and the explicit admission of a need for GC to hide these true desire and pretend otherwise. I use it for what it is - a clear adminssion that some GC at the time were more than prepared to use illegal means, deception and violence to gain their desires.
How about you actualy try and justify your claim that it was not a 'reality'. How about you try and answer my question about who DID know about it? Or do you prefer to make your claims and then avoid having to justify them by using distractions that have nothing do with what you said or my reply?