Cyprus-Forum.com

[Deejay]

Please dont embargo us...the truth cannot be emabrgoed

[MicAtCyp]

Turkcyp

Although I disagree with many parts of your past couple of posts, I think if i were a TC i couldn’t explain the whole situation better than you to my people. I am impressed really, in fact you got many things concerning the GCs very accurately.

There is one point that I disagree definetely

So in short yes I believe we can find a solution if GCs start to compromise. Otherwise we are going towards permanent partition. (as I have already said in so many posts I think it is only second best solution)

I am sure you do not mean "agreed" partition because lthat will take pehaps 20+ years the minimum to even get started.
Are you referring to continuation of the existing situation then?I doubt that too. In my opinion EU will force changes.
Don't forget 15 years down the road we will have tremendous changes that will affect you too.
So no I don't see a road towards partition. On the contrary I see exactly the oposite road.

[MicAtCyp]

My calculations were not far off
28.5% Northern Cyprus
71.5% Southern Cyprus
If you are going to continue to insult me, I can also play that game so I request you refrain from your childish comments otherwise I will also be as rude and nasty as you.

But you ARE, what else can I say? You just proved it once more by copy-pasting us an extract that referes to a Federal solution with lots of returns of GCs to claim your completely faulty calculations for a division were near. How near is the 106% Vs 6% below zero then?

Anyway to get you out of your difficulties here is some help for you.
Privately owned lands.
GCs 60.9%
TCs 12.3%
Others 0.5%
State Land 26.3%

Links:
http://agrino.org/humrights/proposals/77prpsal.html

http://www.greece.org/cyprus/Maps.htm

http://reference.allrefer.com/country-g ... rus97.html
http://www.paseka.org/DocsPaseka/NG-WhosGotWhat.htm

However be careful because if you revert with nonsense again, I can’t promise to be as polite with you.

[erolz]

You want a list with names or what?

It's not a hard question.

let's start easy for you then

Do you think TP read it? Supported it's aims? It's means?

start with than one and we can move on to some other names for you.

Just in case you overlooked it, any chance of an answer for this question Piratis?

Anyway I am away from home for a couple of weeks (before anyone assumes I have been driven from the forum) - so do take you time answering this question if you wish Piratis. Or ignore it if you chose.

[Viewpoint]

MicAtCyp are you aware you talk in riddles and make inflamatory comments, how can ;

28.5% + 71.5% = 106%

Its obviously this is something you are having problems comprehending or its such a sensative issue that you resort to insults. Who the hell do you think you are?, this is an open forum and we can all express our views and opinions, if you do not like what Im saying dont respond with stupid comments.
You could try to be civil and respond with I dont agree with you here are a few sources confirming why your figures are wrong, any normal well educated person and level headed would do this and not try to suppress or intimidate others.

Please do me a favour and dont bother to respond.

[-mikkie2-]

I see Viewpoint is spreading lots of egg shells for you to tread on MicAtCyp!

Viewpoint, if your original numbers were incorrect, then naturally your summs will be incorrect. That is not saying that you can't calculate! It is saying that if you start with garbage figures, no matter how accurate your answers are calculated from these figures, then I am afraid you will get a garbage answer. Now if you find that insulting also, then I guess if you ever meet up with me or MicAtCyp I expect your fists would probably be doing the talking! Take that how you will.

[Piratis]

Do you think TP read it? Supported it's aims? It's means?

Since you ask me what i think the answer is "no", I don't think he supported the aims of that document.

The fact is though, that what I think or what you think, is nothing more than a guess. Do you think it is correct to throw mud at people just because you guess they supported something in the past?

[metecyp]

The fact is though, that what I think or what you think, is nothing more than a guess. Do you think it is correct to throw mud at people just because you guess they supported something in the past?

I would love to see a TC journalist ask T-Pap about this and get his response. Any TC with journalist friends?

[Saint Jimmy]

The fact is though, that what I think or what you think, is nothing more than a guess. Do you think it is correct to throw mud at people just because you guess they supported something in the past?

I would love to see a TC journalist ask T-Pap about this and get his response. Any TC with journalist friends?

Ι think Viewpoint mentioned something the other day. It really would be interesting, although I doubt whether it would be at all useful to open such a discussion, especially as we pipe dreamers are looking forward to new negotiations...

[turkcyp]

deleted by the author...