Piratis wrote:Nikitas, accepting BBF was a huge compromise from our part. However it doesn't mean we would accept whatever is labeled as "BBF". It also goes without saying that we expect from TCs to make a compromise of an equal magnitude from their rights so nobody will be better off or worst off than the 1960 agreements.
Here is a BBF I would accept:
1) To have two states and land distribution to be 18% for north state, 82% for south state. (this covers that Bizonal part)
2) Both states to be just Cypriot states without references to Greek or Turkish (except when referring to language), open equally to all Cypriot citizens without any kind of discrimination.
3) To put a limit on the Greek speaking Cypriots that can be official residents of the north state, and a limit of the Turkish speaking Cypriots that can be residents of the south state, and in this way ensuring that the north state will have a Turkish speaking majority and the south state a Greek Speaking majority (this covers the Bicommunal part)
4) The system to be based on a well functioning true federation like the USA, Russia or Germany. Each state will be able to control certain things, and have its own police etc, but both states to be under the central government which will be democratically elected by all Cypriots as a whole. In the USA for example more populous states elect more electors, to ensure that the "one man one vote" democratic principle is followed as closely as possible. (this covers the Federation part)
5) No guarantors and no British Bases. This will be a new agreement between Cypriots. Since the UK failed to guarantee the independence and sovereignty of Cyprus and we were forced to make different agreements, this means that the UK and the other "guarantors" lose any privilages they got on our island since they didn't do their job right.
6) RoC will be dissolved and the new state will be created only when Turkey withdraws her troops from all territories that will be part of the south Cypriot state.
The land distribution part and functioning of the 2 states elected representatives at the federal level will be the problem parts, how do you see the power sharing and what if more GCs are allowed back into the north state maybe the % can stay at 29% as envisaged in previous plans.