phoenix wrote:
Congratulations on your noble ancestry. You are much blessed Diri.
Your cause is now my cause! . . . . united by a common enemy.
After these romantic exchanges, I'd think you guys will start making out.
phoenix wrote:
Congratulations on your noble ancestry. You are much blessed Diri.
Your cause is now my cause! . . . . united by a common enemy.
shahmaran wrote:But Diri, "traditional" means a custom that is carried from generation to generation, if this "custom" changes all the time then it ceases to be a "tradition", unless of course your tradition is to change all the time, in which case that does not mean anything since that's what we all (humans) do anyways, may i ask how old you are Diri if you don't mind?
And could i please see your sources on the incident of the Turks using biological weapons against the Kurds, thank you.
As Secretary of State at the
War Office in 1919, Churchill
was approached by the RAF
Middle East Command for
permission to use chemical
weapons ’against recalcitrant
Arabs as experiment.’
Churchill authorized the experiment,
dismissing objections:
I do not understand this
squeamishness about the use of gas. I
am strongly in favour of using poisoned
gas against uncivilized tribes. It is not
necessary to use only the most deadly
gases; gases can be used which cause
great inconvenience and would spread
a lively terror and yet would leave no
serious permanent effects on most of
those affected.
Churchill added: ’we cannot in any
circumstances acquiesce in the non
utilization of any weapons which
are available to procure a speedy
termination of the disorder which
prevails on the frontier.’ Chemical
weapons were merely ’the application
of Western science to modern warfare.’
Churchill was in favour of using
air power and poison gas against
’uncivilized tribes’ and ’recalcitrant
Arabs’ i.e. Kurds and Afghans [2].
Not surprisingly, in the 1990s, William
Waldegrave, who was in charge of
Prime Minister John Major’s ’open
government’ initiative, ordered the
removal from the Public Record Office
of ’files detailing how British troops had
used poison gas against Iraqi dissidents
including Kurds in 1919 [2].
In this way, a people who wished to
run their own affairs were oppressed
to the limit of genocide. Their King
was undermined by the mighty British
forces and an ’imported’ King from
totally different culture was forced
upon them.
So you're a TC with no traditional clothes and no history and no nothing... So go bark somewhere else
T_C wrote:So you're a TC with no traditional clothes and no history and no nothing... So go bark somewhere else
Yes we do have traditional clothes and history thank you very much...plus I always thought barking up trees was a Kurdish thing!?!?!
Dîrî wrote:@bg_turk
I already gave you TWO sources - in BOOK form... Go read them if you're interested in the truth. Untill you have - please don't have a set mind...
bg_turk wrote:Dîrî wrote:@bg_turk
I already gave you TWO sources - in BOOK form... Go read them if you're interested in the truth. Untill you have - please don't have a set mind...
When and where do your book sources allege the gassing of Kurds occurred? Which page are you quoting from?
Return to Politics and Elections
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests