by Nikitas » Thu Dec 06, 2007 1:53 am
Whether it is done by choice or not, the fact remains that the TCs enjoy freedom of movement, trade and employment in the south, which proves that there is no embargo as the word is understood in legal terms. Embargo means stopping people from doing any of those things.
If the RoC does these things because it has to, then the TRNC does not do them for what reason? Where is the mutuality in this deal?
Trade is open too, and the EU took the initiative to enable the TC chamber of commerce to issue certificates of orgin for goods traded from the north. The only restriction is as to which port will be used. Hardly an embargo. The chamber of commerce daily certifies goods that are sent and sold to the south, but it refuses to certify goods for export through Limassol and Larnaca ports.
The TRNC wants to open and operate ports and airports and that is what is in dispute, again, hardly an embargo. All tourists who arrive in the south can visit the north with no restrictions, goods imported in the south regularly cross over to the north (building materials mostly). So where is the embargo?
Embargo would be if the RoC stopped supplies, tourists, services from reaching the north and erfused to import antyhing from there.