by Nikitas » Sat Dec 01, 2007 9:41 pm
Natty,
The name EOKA is used somewhat indiscriminately by both sides to this debate. EOKA was disbanded in 1959 and some of its fighters were awarded government positions.
Once the intercommunal fighting broke out in December 1963 some EOKA fighters were involved but that did not constitute a resurrection of the original organization. They were part of a larger irregular force.
In the early 70s a thing called EOKA B was formed which had very littel to do with EOKA or its ideology. They were young people disenchanted with the independence, as opposed to Enosis, policy that Cyprus was pursuing and they mounted an insurrection campaign against the Cyprus government. They were officered and financed by the dictatorship in Greece. That is about it in a nutshell.
The original EOKA did very little fighting with Turkish Cypriots. No matter what people here, or eslewhere say, it just did not have the resources and the manpower to fight large battles against settled populations. Its actions were hit and run against British patrols and installations. It did kill a number of Greek Cypriots it accused of collaborating with the British. Of all that has been written about the EOKA the most valid work remains the memoire of its founder General George Grivas.