Cyprus-Forum.com

by **kalahari** » Sat Dec 01, 2007 12:01 pm

I'm a zig-zag thinker.

My type starts off talking about one thing then suddenly

Fishing has always been a passion of mine. I first started fishing at the age of

Are you going to the AEL match tonight? I have to stay in. Bah.

by **webbo** » Sat Dec 01, 2007 12:23 pm

kalahari wrote:I'm a zig-zag thinker.

My type starts off talking about one thing then suddenly

Fishing has always been a passion of mine. I first started fishing at the age of

Are you going to the AEL match tonight? I have to stay in. Bah.

Are you a man?

NIKI, Thanks for the compliment mate, and after I gave you good directions!!

Bubbles x

by **Kikapu** » Sat Dec 01, 2007 12:29 pm

I think men are "Lateral thinkers" when they want to have sex with a woman by trying everything they can to get her to bed.

Once in bed and having sex, they then become "Linear thinkers", because nothing else is more important than sex during intercourse.

by **webbo** » Sat Dec 01, 2007 12:31 pm

Kikapu wrote:I think men are "Lateral thinkers" when they want to have sex with a woman by trying everything they can to get her to bed.

Once in bed and having sex, they then become "Linear thinkers", because nothing else is more important than sex during intercourse.

Well thought out mate!!!

Bubbles x

by **Filitsa** » Sat Dec 01, 2007 5:42 pm

Get Real wrote:The acquisition of knowledge IS understanding; think about it.

When the primary school child recites multiplication facts, e.g. 2 X 3 = 6, he has displayed knowledge. When he is capable of explaining why 2 X 3 = 6, he has displayed an understanding.

Get Real wrote:I can teach a monkey to apply a lot of things but that doesn’t necessarily mean he understands what he is doing.

He understands that the application produces an effect.

Get Real wrote:Cheap sophistries… the world is full of them.

You're not familiar with Bloom's Taxonomy of Cognition?

by **kalahari** » Sat Dec 01, 2007 5:45 pm

Oh, Bloom's Taxonomy of Cognition – oh yes. 'Course, yer Bloom's Taxonomy of Cognition is a different class of Taxonomy all together, particularly when it's of yer Cognition. Definitely. Nice choice squire.

by **Get Real!** » Sat Dec 01, 2007 5:49 pm

Niki wrote:
Get Real! wrote:
Niki wrote:This forum is a bit of light relief for me (apart from when GR slags me off) so I really don't feel like having to force the linear side of me out here!

Correct me if I'm wrong but doesn't that mean "Says bad things about me" ?

Yes.

You lying cow!

NOW you've got something to complain about! :lol:

by **phoenix** » Sat Dec 01, 2007 5:49 pm

kalahari wrote:Oh, Bloom's Taxonomy of Cognition – oh yes. 'Course, yer Bloom's Taxonomy of Cognition is a different class of Taxonomy all together, particularly when it's of yer Cognition. Definitely. Nice choice squire.

Do you write the scripts for Monty Python

. . . I swear that's Michael Palin talking

by **Filitsa** » Sat Dec 01, 2007 5:53 pm

kalahari wrote:Oh, Bloom's Taxonomy of Cognition – oh yes. 'Course, yer Bloom's Taxonomy of Cognition is a different class of Taxonomy all together, particularly when it's of yer Cognition. Definitely. Nice choice squire.

by **phoenix** » Sat Dec 01, 2007 6:00 pm

Filitsa wrote:
kalahari wrote:Oh, Bloom's Taxonomy of Cognition – oh yes. 'Course, yer Bloom's Taxonomy of Cognition is a different class of Taxonomy all together, particularly when it's of yer Cognition. Definitely. Nice choice squire.

Filitsa . . . are you lost for words?

Cyprus-Forum.com

Are you a linear or a lateral thinker?

Who is online