-mikkie2- wrote:So what about the £200m or so that Cypriots have already spent in the north since the gates opened.
-mikkie2- wrote:The fact that holidaymakers can come to the north via Larnaca is irrelevant as well? The fact that tourism in the north has been boosted significantly is also irrelevant? Is this what you call the isolation of Turkish Cypriots?
BigDutch wrote:The current situation is that advertising of North Cyprus is happening in London. The discussion should be about the possible events occuring from this advertising, and their impact on the Cyprus Problem.
By going off topic by getting into "we did this, you did that" and generally taking "sides" - how does this move forward ?
BigDutch wrote:Are you at all concerned that direct-contact into occupied Cyprus will actually cement the TC's into the North and the GC's into the South ?
I can certainly see how you consider anything that helps TC survive in the current status quo as being counter productive to a solution. In my view it is only counter productive to a solution that seeks to FORCE the TC community into submission. If you want a solution based on such force and believe that such a solution will lead to peace in Cyprus, that is your pergoative. If however you believe in the possibility of a solution that is the result of sincere agreement and acceptance- then the 'leveling' of the two communites , economicaly or politically does not hinder this it enhances it.Back to top
This is exactley the point you are missing bigdutch
Sometimes i get the impression that TC's use the "poor TC" when it suits them. When the gates opened the TC's on the forum were all saying "look, we aren't poor contary to the GC Media", now you are back at saying "we won't survive without direct-contact". It seems everytime something happens that improves the TC situation something else comes along that is also required to stop starvation.erolz wrote:Our first concern is our survial as we live today. In my opinion it is unreasonable and nieve to expect us to not care about how we will survive today, in the jope that such 'not caring' will help us survive tomorrow.
As an outsider i don't see that co-operating with the RoC in trade matters is being forced into submission.erolz wrote:I can certainly see how you consider anything that helps TC survive in the current status quo as being counter productive to a solution. In my view it is only counter productive to a solution that seeks to FORCE the TC community into submission.
"Force" of varying kinds has created the situation as it exists today ... there are lots of "if's" and "but's" we could say about what happened in the past but the current situation is that the RoC are offering items for co-operation which it appears the TC's are not interested in, preferring to only want direct-trade.erolz wrote:If you want a solution based on such force and believe that such a solution will lead to peace in Cyprus, that is your pergoative.
So what "you" want is to be left to your own devices trading with the world until "you" feel financially comfortable enough to being to negotiate ? I`m sorry but i cannot see negotiation starting once "North Cyprus" is financially comfortable as there will no longer be a need for negotiation with RoC as you have got all you need. Which would then create a permanent parition, something which i understood was not wanted by the majority of Cypriots.erolz wrote:If however you believe in the possibility of a solution that is the result of sincere agreement and acceptance- then the 'leveling' of the two communites , economicaly or politically does not hinder this it enhances it.
BigDutch wrote:1) Ι cannot see negotiation starting once "North Cyprus" is financially comfortable as there will no longer be a need for negotiation with RoC as you have got all you need.
2) Which would then create a permanent parition, something which i understood was not wanted by the majority of Cypriots.
brother wrote:so in reality stop putting words in our mouths
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests