Cyprus-Forum.com

[shahmaran]

Well not another planet but another country

What is it to you anyways Suckteridos

God ivning evribodi I yum fom Tashinkoy in Uzbekistan...

Leave the poor Uzbeks out of this Homokrates, this is between you and me

[halil]

Utan be uzunden.....Shut up now!

Zan,
why do you bother this guy .leave him alone man . He is wounded gramphone .

OKUNDURDUM YAZINDIRDIM GENE BALAGUDALİ GENE BALAGUDALİ .

[zan]

[quote="halil"][quote="zan"]Utan be uzunden.....Shut up now! [/quote]

Zan,
why do you bother this guy .leave him alone man . He is wounded gramphone .

OKUNDURDUM YAZINDIRDIM GENE BALAGUDALİ GENE BALAGUDALİ .

[url=http://www.postimage.org/image.php?v=aV1DVJfJ][img]http://www.postimage.org/aV1DVJfJ.gif[/img][/url][/quote]


You are right Halil...I even said I would but I didn't.

[Kikapu]

What the messages only you got because of your racist attitude towards Turks and anything about them.

Zan, if you really had a Brain, you would be danger to the world the way you try to reach your conclusions.

Since you really do not have Brains, the world is a Safer Palace, but consequently, you are a Danger to yourself..

Now lets go back to the simplistic and propaganda points...I said the film was simplistic (Although not enough for you to understand) and I was proved right by the statement of the people who made the film...You said they were just propagandists and you were proved wrong...

You do not see the unintentional Propaganda in the Film, because you like the Propaganda that's in the Film. I did not call the makers of the Film Propagandist, I said that the Film as it was made, portrays Propaganda, because the makers of the Film diverted from the original script due to finances, and as a result, the ended up with a "half-baked peace film". Our friend said it clearly that, it was a Propaganda film, a Peace Propaganda film. Now before you get wild jumping up and down, I know what he meant, and that it was a tongue and cheek comment, but the truth is, at the end, that's how it finished, a Propaganda Peace Film, which was different from the original idea, which was to bring people from both sides, but it only brought people from the North. Now, if you don't think, to an unsuspecting viewer without the film makers explanations on what their intent was, and what they actually ended up with, then you just want to stay Blind, Deaf and Dumb.

The people who made the film got heir massage across as I keep saying to you and it is only you that does not see that.....Accept your inept film reviewing abilities and move on.

No they did not, that's my point all the way. They said so themselves, that they had to divert from their original script, which was to have been a Peace film between the two sides. It never happened in the film. All they were able to do, was to show in the most unrealistic way, how they achieved peace....alone.

By the way, I never claimed to be a "Film Buff". I enjoy a good films as much as the next person. I tend to remember certain lines that are original, specially if they are funny. Now, you have been using a line from a film lately on several occasions, which is "Farting in the Wind". Of course the original line is "Disappear like a Fart in the Wind" It's not meant to be funny, but I do remember the line all the same from a great movie, "The Shawshank Redemption".

Just thought I'll let you know.

[T_C]

The camera work was done by our friend Eylem Caner and the special effects were done by again Eylem and Ömer. I just watched them suffer

Does Eylem live on the road the movie was filmed?!?

[Silenzio]

Yes, Eylem lives on the road with the first soldier scene and ömer lives on the road with the second soldier scene.

And about the message getting or not getting accross to the viewer. A person who liked and enjoyed the film will of course say that he perceived the message (or 'a' message, depending on the intertextuality). A person who didn't like and enjoy the film will of course say that either there was know no message to perceive or the message was just wrong. Trying to convince others that a film has a certain and definite message or meaning, seems kinda meaningless to me. That's why cinema (or attempts at cinema ) is so exciting, it's different for everyone...

[zan]

Yes, Eylem lives on the road with the first soldier scene and ömer lives on the road with the second soldier scene.

And about the message getting or not getting accross to the viewer. A person who liked and enjoyed the film will of course say that he perceived the message (or 'a' message, depending on the intertextuality). A person who didn't like and enjoy the film will of course say that either there was know no message to perceive or the message was just wrong. Trying to convince others that a film has a certain and definite message or meaning, seems kinda meaningless to me. That's why cinema (or attempts at cinema ) is so exciting, it's different for everyone...

Perhaps a scantily clad lady would have kept the non intellectuals busy while the rest of us enjoyed the message...