by Tim Drayton » Sat Nov 24, 2007 5:44 pm
Nikitas,
There is a very paradoxical situation. On the one hand the RoC government derives its international legitimacy from the foundation agreements and the 1960 constitution. On the other hand, this constitution proved unworkable in practice. Some of its provisions are arguably also anachronistic in the multicultural Europe in which we now live. Then you have an invasion. To what extent are emergency measures or unilateral amendments justified? I am no expert in constitutional law, so I don't know.
However, I can't help feeling that it is very dangerous to make unilateral amendements to the basic principles of the constitution. One such core principle is bicommunality. Yes, Turkish Cypriots are voting for the president for the first time. The reason they are doing so for the first time is that, under the constitution, they are supposed to be electing the Turkish Cypriot Vice President. Where does this actually place Turkish Cypriots? If a small number of Turkish Cypriots residing in the south vote alongside Greek Cypriots in what are technically Greek Cypriot constituencies, then does ths not de facto turn them into a minority?
There is a saying about giving somebody enough rope to hang themselves. In 2006 a small number of Turkish Cypriots voted for candidates to fill Greek Cypriot places in the House of Representatives, and there was even one Turkish Cypriot candidate. This year they voted in elections to Greek Cypriot municipalities. Next year they will vote for the Greek Cypriot president.
I can't help wondering if the outside world will suddenly turn round and says, "Hold on. Why should we not recognise the TRNC? You have now turned the Turkish Cypriots living in the south into a minority. This flies in the face of the principle of bi-communality. Why, then, should the Turkish Cypriots not have their own government to represent them where they are in the majority?"
Perhaps I am wrong, but this thought has been at the back of my mind for some time.