Cyprus-Forum.com

by **DINOS SKALIOTIS** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 2:24 pm

EasyE wrote:
DINOS SKALIOTIS wrote:
EasyE wrote:
DINOS SKALIOTIS wrote:
EasyE wrote:Greece won in 2004, but they played boring football and fluked it
that is a rediculous comment! and sounds like sour grapes! england or anyone else would have loved to have played the greek way in 2004 if it meant winning the championship! in years to come the records will state that greece won in 2004 without losing a game and thats what people will remember, we beat portugal twice not once and they were the home nation and many peoples favourites, and who knocked out england? erm,,,,portugal, we also beat france, czech republic, and this was all luck wasnt it? none of them teams wanted to win they just all gave it to greece

It was good to see Greece win don;t get me wrong but come on it was BORING! Score one goal then get 11 men behind the ball. It wasnt the most attractive football was it.

Perhaps fluked it wasn't the correct word i suppose and perhaps i should of used a one-off
I WASNT BORED, BUT THEN I AM A FAN I GUESS, SO WHAT ABOUT THE GAME WHEN THEY SCORED FROM A CORNER RIGHT AT THE END? WAS THAT ALSO SCORING A GOAL AND THEN 11 MEN BEHIND THE BALL? MAYBE YOU WERE WATCHING A DIFFERENT GAME FROM ME? PEOPLE ALWAYS WANT TO DETRACT FROM ANY GREAT GREEK ACHIEVEMENTS ITS ALWAYS THE SAME, THEY HAVE JUST QUALIFIED SCORING THE HIGHEST POINTS TALLY OF ANY TEAM IN EUROPE! I SUPPOSE THIS IS ALSO BORING AND A ONE OFF?

Anyone (apart from our shower of shit) can qualify. Who was in your group?

i would say that greece`s group was a lot harder than englands! and like even you say if anyone can qualify where are england,scotland,republic of ireland? not only did greece qualify they qualified with the highest number of points! thats higher than italy, germany,france, czech,croatia,holland, france,portugal! do you need me to carry on or do you get my point? or are we just lucky again?

by **saravakos** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 4:00 pm

Our Euro 2004 win was not flukey at all. 1 result is a fluke but not beating Portugal - the hosts- twice, France (the favourites), Czech Rep (the faves after the French got knocked out), and drawing with Spain. Yeah we had some luck along the way, but everyone needs that when winning anything. We played to our strengths, when attacking we converted to a 4-3-3 and when defending we were a 4-5-1. Hard work and pride to play for your national team, unlike the primadonnas who wear the england shirt.

by **saravakos** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 7:09 pm

the 'pride' of england! LOL

http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/2511_sex_shame.shtml

by **jansler** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 5:35 pm

You should support your country or team quite so, but i think the rest of the world have become tired of Englands arrogance in as much as they will win everything, booing of other teams national anthem is just so English and thats why you have little support. Shame but maybe just maybe England are not as good as they think they are.

by **DINOS SKALIOTIS** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 8:40 pm

jansler wrote:You should support your country or team quite so, but i think the rest of the world have become tired of Englands arrogance in as much as they will win everything, booing of other teams national anthem is just so English and thats why you have little support. Shame but maybe just maybe England are not as good as they think they are.

is the correct answer! :wink:

by **Southerner** » Wed Nov 28, 2007 7:32 pm

How can Englnd expect to win when there are far too many overseas players in the premier league, where can UK players gain top class experience whilst playing in the lower divisions.

by **DINOS SKALIOTIS** » Thu Nov 29, 2007 12:11 am

Southerner wrote:How can Englnd expect to win when there are far too many overseas players in the premier league, where can UK players gain top class experience whilst playing in the lower divisions.

valid point and something i have been saying for a while, too many mercenaries in the prem just for high wages!

by **saravakos** » Thu Nov 29, 2007 11:00 am

thats an excuse southerner...there were something like 77 english players to choose from, but the same players always get picked even though they play shit. no heart no desire.

by **DINOS SKALIOTIS** » Thu Nov 29, 2007 2:07 pm

saravakos wrote:thats an excuse southerner...there were something like 77 english players to choose from, but the same players always get picked even though they play shit. no heart no desire.

you have made me feel dirty now for sticking up for the english! i`m gonna go and wash my mouth out with thinners! :wink:

by **saravakos** » Thu Nov 29, 2007 3:30 pm

haha dropi sou!

Cyprus-Forum.com

England are sh1te

Who is online