Cymart,
It is understood that negotiation will involve some give and take. But having accepted a Federal Bizonal Biregional solution since 1977 how much more can the GC side concede?
I agree that Pap is not the best. If one of the other candidates is elected what could he concede to get to a solution? Accept the presence of settlers as citizens? Grant 100 per cent of the TC demands immediately and wait 15 years for our "gains"? Accept the existence of a common "border" between the Dekhelia base and the TC state effectively cutting the GC state in two? Shoulder the total cost of a solution by taxing the GC community and only them?
It is easy for the candidates that do not have to do these things to promise and criticise. Objectively I dont see any of them doing any of these things if elected and not facing a popular revolt by the public who will know whether the present non solution is better than these unnecessary concessions.