by phoenix » Thu Nov 22, 2007 6:40 pm
Get Real! wrote:utu wrote:alexISS wrote:Teammates awarding points to each other... Nice...utu wrote:observer wrote:alexiSS - Surely you mean that we are "so-called isolated"!
Ouch. One point for observer.
Interesting comeback. That will get you at least a half-point.
Grade “D” debaters bickering! 2 points deducted…
by Get Real! » Thu Nov 22, 2007 7:28 pm
phoenix wrote:Get Real! wrote:utu wrote:alexISS wrote:Teammates awarding points to each other... Nice...utu wrote:observer wrote:alexiSS - Surely you mean that we are "so-called isolated"!
Ouch. One point for observer.
Interesting comeback. That will get you at least a half-point.
Grade “D” debaters bickering! 2 points deducted…
Absence of foul language and personal insults, award 4 points.....
by phoenix » Thu Nov 22, 2007 7:37 pm
Get Real! wrote:phoenix wrote:Get Real! wrote:utu wrote:alexISS wrote:Teammates awarding points to each other... Nice...utu wrote:observer wrote:alexiSS - Surely you mean that we are "so-called isolated"!
Ouch. One point for observer.
Interesting comeback. That will get you at least a half-point.
Grade “D” debaters bickering! 2 points deducted…
Absence of foul language and personal insults, award 4 points.....
Back scratching alliance... +10 points!
by Get Real! » Thu Nov 22, 2007 7:45 pm
phoenix wrote:Get Real! wrote:phoenix wrote:Get Real! wrote:utu wrote:alexISS wrote:Teammates awarding points to each other... Nice...utu wrote:observer wrote:alexiSS - Surely you mean that we are "so-called isolated"!
Ouch. One point for observer.
Interesting comeback. That will get you at least a half-point.
Grade “D” debaters bickering! 2 points deducted…
Absence of foul language and personal insults, award 4 points.....
Back scratching alliance... +10 points!
Turks, Canadians, Greeks and Cypriots in peaceful negotiations... +20 points!
by -mikkie2- » Thu Nov 22, 2007 8:01 pm
by Get Real! » Thu Nov 22, 2007 8:05 pm
-mikkie2- wrote:I think that the Republic of Cyrpus, as a gesture, should give its permission for Famagusta port to be opened. I would then promptly set sail a ship under the Cyprus flag and enter the port of Famagusta. I wonder how the Turks would stop a ship that is legally registered in Cyprus, that is legally entering one of its own ports that is has legally deemed open! I wonder how the EU would react if the Turks stop or sink this ship from entering its own portss. I wonder if we have politicians with the balls to do this. And I also wonder if the Turks realise the implication of opening the port to traffic. It poses some very interesting questions!
by Pyrpolizer » Thu Nov 22, 2007 11:58 pm
-mikkie2- wrote:I think that the Republic of Cyrpus, as a gesture, should give its permission for Famagusta port to be opened. I would then promptly set sail a ship under the Cyprus flag and enter the port of Famagusta. I wonder how the Turks would stop a ship that is legally registered in Cyprus, that is legally entering one of its own ports that is has legally deemed open! I wonder how the EU would react if the Turks stop or sink this ship from entering its own portss. I wonder if we have politicians with the balls to do this. And I also wonder if the Turks realise the implication of opening the port to traffic. It poses some very interesting questions!
by Get Real! » Fri Nov 23, 2007 12:09 am
Pyrpolizer wrote:-mikkie2- wrote:I think that the Republic of Cyrpus, as a gesture, should give its permission for Famagusta port to be opened. I would then promptly set sail a ship under the Cyprus flag and enter the port of Famagusta. I wonder how the Turks would stop a ship that is legally registered in Cyprus, that is legally entering one of its own ports that is has legally deemed open! I wonder how the EU would react if the Turks stop or sink this ship from entering its own portss. I wonder if we have politicians with the balls to do this. And I also wonder if the Turks realise the implication of opening the port to traffic. It poses some very interesting questions!
Interesting thoughts!
Could you analyze the underlined part as to what it means in practice?
Concerned at the declaration by the Turkish Cypriot authorities issued on 15 November 1983 which purports to create an independent state in northern Cyprus,
Considering that this declaration is incompatible with the 1960 Treaty concerning the establishment of the Republic of Cyprus and the 1960 Treaty of Guarantee,
Considering therefore that the attempt to create a "Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus", is invalid, and will contribute to a worsening of the situation in Cyprus,
1. Deplores the declaration of the Turkish Cypriot authorities of the purported secession of part of the Republic of Cyprus;
2. Considers the declaration referred to above as legally invalid and calls for its withdrawal;
3. Calls for the urgent and effective implementation of its resolutions 365(1974) and 367(1975);
6. Calls upon all States to respect the sovereignty, independence, territorial integrity and non-alignment of the Republic of Cyprus;
7. Calls upon all States not to recognise any Cypriot state other than the Republic of Cyprus;
by Get Real! » Fri Nov 23, 2007 1:03 pm
-mikkie2- wrote:"And I wonder how much more bollocks you'll post before heading off to Erol's where you belong..."
GR, you are a moron. Go f**k yourself.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests
