Pyrpolizer wrote:Kikapu wrote:MR-from-NG wrote:This is what Pyrpolizer said,
And that impression was not far from reality. That's why the Annan plan was rejected.
I don't blame the TCs, when I realize they themselves understand this was not right.
On a side note. Believe me any solution that dares touch on peoples rights of ownership is going to bring worse bloodshed than the 60s. The only scheme that can work is exchange of equal value of properties and the rest stay to the original owners to do whatever they like with them. Most Gcs will not return, most probably they will sell or develop their properties and that would benefit the TCs in a dual way.(development in their own area without too many GCs returning)
Are you more Greek than Pyrpolizer?
What Pyro says in correct. Only you are not reading it correctly. What Pyro is saying, that some land compensation will need to be made because some of the GC lands have already been developed on, therefore compensation is in order, however, for all the other GC land that has not been developed on but were sold on the cheap to buyers, need to be returned back to their rightful owners and the rightful owners themselves will determine if they would wish to return back to their lands sell it, rent it, or develop it. I have made the claim many times before, that the majority of the GC's will not move to the North no matter what kind of system of Government is used there, but it will be their choice and not the choice of the Partitionist. We can guarantee a better future for the TC's this way than imposing other methods by force, which will end up in bloodshed. Our good friend "Devil" gave good examples on another thread couple of days ago, as to why a forced or even a agreed Partition is bad for Cyprus and Cypriots in general.
Actually what I was saying is that ALL land either developed or non developed should be returned to the rightful owners. I think I was perfectly clear when I said no GC can accept his ownerships rights taken away.
The case of unused land is perfectly clear, it returns to the rightful owner immediately.
In case the land was developed then there should be a separate title deed for the building sitting on it, which deed should expire after the lifetime of the building (70 years is what all concrete buildings live).During that period the owner of the land is entitled rent from the one who builted the building on his land.Any other arrangement between the two like exchange, selling, or buying should be entirely upto them.
Is this what you understood MrfromNg, or something else
Pryp, I don't suffer with lack of understanding. I congratulated you last night for your very realistic vision. What you are saying is the most likeliest scenario.
Show me one post from Kikapu that resembles anything to your post. All he can say is "what about the 200000 refugees, you are holding onto their properties illegally, now get out and let these poor people back into their properties" maybe not his exact words but very close. Never will he mentions what happens to the poor TC refugees living in these properties, nor will he mention (as you did) that most of them don't want to come back and they'd rather sell and live happily where they are now.
Of course I and the rest of the TCs welcome those GCs that want to return.
The guy fights a better and more determined fight than any of you GCs. I bet his blood is more Greek than that of Piratis, kifeas, Sotos and Phoenix. He is a wannabe Greek.
I hope you now understand my point.