The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Compromises?

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby cannedmoose » Mon Mar 14, 2005 5:06 pm

insan wrote:
Many of the problems with the 1960 constitution stemmed from the fact that it was a top-down agreement, imposed on the Cypriot communities from outside, and imposed on the Cypriot people from an albeit reluctant leadership.


Yes. Any solution proposal which didn't/doesn't grant GC community Enosis and full control of Cyprus free from Turkish guarantorship, has been considered as "imposed" and "top-down". Great logic. :lol:


Insan, thanks for your kind appreciation, however, I wasn't implying that the situation as it stands today is akin to that of the early 1960s. I think my statement is relatively accurate as regards that period, but the status quo is different today. My point was not to imply that GCs still hanker after enosis, I've already told you my opinion on that, where I think my analysis still remains true is that the Annan Plan was largely a top-down instrument, yes it had greater input from the two communities during the discussion phases (more than can be said for the 1960 Constitutional arrangements), but it wasn't something that both communities could both read and feel that it 'belonged' to them, which is the true purpose of any constitution.
User avatar
cannedmoose
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4279
Joined: Sun Feb 29, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: England

Postby insan » Mon Mar 14, 2005 5:26 pm

Watch them how would they jump on any "top-down" proposal which grant them full control of Cyprus and everything they dream of...
User avatar
insan
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 9044
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2003 11:33 pm
Location: Somewhere in ur network. ;]

Postby cannedmoose » Mon Mar 14, 2005 5:40 pm

insan wrote:Watch them how would they jump on any "top-down" proposal which grant them full control of Cyprus and everything they dream of...


Ok insan ImageImageImage
User avatar
cannedmoose
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4279
Joined: Sun Feb 29, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: England

Postby MicAtCyp » Mon Mar 14, 2005 9:02 pm

Cannedmoose wrote: Therefore, the Annan Plan was and remains legal under EU law.


If it were so there would be no need to:

ATTACHMENT 2: LETTER TO THE PRESIDENT OF THE EUROPEAN
COUNCIL
[to be sent upon entry into force of the Foundation Agreement]
Mr. President,
We wish to inform you that, having been approved at separate
simultaneous referenda, the Foundation Agreement between the Greek
Cypriots and the Turkish Cypriots (plus 160% illegal Turkish settlers) has entered into force, and a new state of
affairs has come into being in Cyprus. Accordingly, the United Cyprus
Republic is an independent and sovereign state with a single international
legal personality and a federal (???????) government and consists of two constituent
states, namely the Greek Cypriot State and the Turkish Cypriot State.
We solemnly declare that the United Cyprus Republic is ready to
assume all rights (???????) and obligations arising from the Treaty of Accession of 16
April 2003.
Referring to the special powers delegated to the Council ( the Council does NOT have so extensive rights the matter has to pass through all the EU Parliaments) under Article 4
of Protocol 10 of that treaty and to the conclusions of the European Council of
12 December 2003, and bearing in mind that the Foundation Agreement is in
line with the principles on which the European Union is founded, (Is It?)
we wish to request (Oh you just request.Well your request is not accepted-have something to say?) the European Union to endorse the Foundation Agreement and to
accommodate its terms by adapting the terms of Accession before 1 May
2004 in a way that results in the adaptation of primary law
(Tell me who in the EU would accept such a racist agreement to become their primary law?)
and ensures the legal certainty and security of the Foundation Agreement (this is the guarantee that Turkey was asking) within
European Union’s legal system for all concerned.
We furthermore request the Council of the European Union to take
appropriate measures regarding the application of the acquis communautaire
in the Turkish Cypriot State in phases that are aligned to the level of
harmonization and administrative capacity, and to adopt special measures,
including financial assistance, for the development of the Turkish Cypriot
State.
Please accept, Excellency, the assurances of our highest
consideration.
Co-President Co-President



And the EU reply is:
Get lost both of you.Old Cyprus Republic no longer exists we have nothing to say to you.Make a new application for EU membership and we will see.

The European Council cannot decide on this matter my itself.The matter has to pass through the Parliaments of all 25 member states and get approved. Tell me how many parliaments you think would accept it to be their own Primary law.

Mikkie was right. The Anan Plan was designed to expell Cyprus from the EU.
User avatar
MicAtCyp
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1579
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2004 10:10 am

Postby turkcyp » Mon Mar 14, 2005 10:42 pm

MicAtCyp wrote:And the EU reply is:
Get lost both of you.Old Cyprus Republic no longer exists we have nothing to say to you.Make a new application for EU membership and we will see.

The European Council cannot decide on this matter my itself.The matter has to pass through the Parliaments of all 25 member states and get approved. Tell me how many parliaments you think would accept it to be their own Primary law.

Mikkie was right. The Anan Plan was designed to expell Cyprus from the EU.


Sorry to say this MicAtCyp, but this is the most bogus I have heard for a while.

I am not saying that the acceptance of Annan Plan would not create problems in EU but would rather create problems to TCs instead of GCs.

I totally agree with you with the fact that, Annan Plan was designed for before RoC’s EU accession. And furthermore I have been indicating in this forum from the day one that whatever we agree on from right now has to be accepted by the EU as a whole and by other states individually so that it becomes a primary law.

But unlike what you claim this would not result in expulsion of RoC from EU but would result in elimination of many points of the plan from the agreement after it has been approved by us, because they contain derogations to EU law not negotiated between RoC and EU during its accessions.

This is why I have been telling from day one that any plan that will be accepted by us in the future (if they include derogation to acquis communutaire) has to be approved by the EU and each individual state so that they become primary law in EU with derogations, otherwise every derogation we agree on, would be returned by the EU courts by some zealous GCs. That is what we can not accept. We do not want to have an agreement to be later turned by EU courts.

In the future solution, the only way round this is to specifically state in the solution that this agreement will take place when it is ratified by EU and by individual states so that it becomes EU primary law, OR you guys should be willing to accept that RoC is dead and ask for EU to accepts the new united Cyprus as a new member, (which actually amounts to the same thing, because it still will have to be approved by every member individually, including current RoC)

Other than that any derogation we have come to accepts as majorities in both sides will be challenged by the minority of each side be turned from EU courts.

This is why current RoC government is trying to solve the issue as it is the same as unification of Germany, knowing that in that kind of environment TCs would not end up getting any derogations to acquis.

But having said all is not loss for TCs. Because RoC got accession to EU on 1960 constitution (at least on paper) that constitution is a part or primary law, so the rights of TCs from that constitution can be asked for in EU courts. And this is what you will be seeing in the coming years, more and more TCs applying EU courts trying to force RoC to obey to its 1960 constitution and to all the rights of TCs stemming from that constitution. (including the right fro vice president with veto power, the foreign judges, the 70/30 ratio that you guys love to hate, etc. etc.)
turkcyp
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1117
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2004 12:40 am

Postby MicAtCyp » Mon Mar 14, 2005 11:00 pm

Insan wrote: Watch them how would they jump on any "top-down" proposal which grant them full control of Cyprus and everything they dream of...


You mean the way you jumped on the 1960 agreements and the Anan Plan?
Lemmie go, lemmie go, screems the poor Anaplanie
User avatar
MicAtCyp
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1579
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2004 10:10 am

Postby brother » Tue Mar 15, 2005 12:32 am

Micatcyp wrote:

"You mean the way you jumped on the 1960 agreements and the Anan Plan?
Lemmie go, lemmie go, screems the poor Anaplanie"


What does Anaplanie mean? :shock:
User avatar
brother
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4711
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2004 5:30 pm
Location: Cyprus/U.K

Postby MicAtCyp » Tue Mar 15, 2005 12:44 am

Brother Billy is male Billie is female :wink: :D :D
User avatar
MicAtCyp
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1579
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2004 10:10 am

Postby MicAtCyp » Tue Mar 15, 2005 12:45 am

Turkcyp wrote: But unlike what you claim this would not result in expulsion of RoC from EU but would result in elimination of many points of the plan from the agreement after it has been approved by us, because they contain derogations to EU law not negotiated between RoC and EU during its accessions.


But my dear friend Turkcyp, I do not disagree on any single point of your post and I don't see where your reply disagrees to what I said, other than perhaps the above quoted part. Which I don't really see as a disagreement but rather than a different lets say "evaluation" of what would follow.
However I have another evaluation that I did not mention before. That "Primary Law" thing my friend was the 11th demand of the Generals!! And IT-WAS-INCLUDED- in the Plan. Without its full satisfaction the Generals would be leagally covered NOT let the agreement move a single inch! Even your line of prediction of events would NOT satisfy the Generals. So either Cyprus would drop out of the EU or Solution as per Anan Plan yok!

That was the final round of Turkeys Original target originating from 2002 (?) to de-train Cyprus EU road! It surprises me how easily we the Cypriots tend to forget such important statements made in the past.
User avatar
MicAtCyp
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1579
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2004 10:10 am

Postby brother » Tue Mar 15, 2005 12:47 am

DOH...... :lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
brother
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4711
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2004 5:30 pm
Location: Cyprus/U.K

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests