Viewpoint wrote:Your own quote back at you Saint. Very diplomatic answer but at some stage you to will see what I see now.
So, you see things I don't see, huh? That sounds to me like you either know a lot, or that you know nothing.
What is it that you see? You got disappointed in GCs because they voted NO, but that doesn't make much sense to me. GCs voted NO because they believed that the A-Plan would have opened hell's gates. You must also know that GCs are not generally legal experts. Their beliefs on a legal document were based on interpretations by people that they consider more suitable to comment on it - lawyers (most of our politicians are lawyers). Insan has made the distinction between the ruling elite and the people a zillion times.
And I don't buy the argument that we can't agree on anything in here, so that's that. What we can't agree on (a solution) is still up for debate - hence, we have a debate. Once the issue is resolved, people will stop talking about its form and how to better it, and will take it for granted. The variables that fucked this process up the first time around are dead and buried.