by T_C » Tue Nov 06, 2007 3:15 am
"The pre-election expedition opened the discussion on the handlings 2004. the AKEL i'gejre the question of acceptance epjdjajtisj'as in the New York, as well as not negotiation in the Mpoy'rgkerstok. The "P" reveals today with ntokoyme'nta what precisely it has happened in this two historical moments of Cypriot question. Under who conditions accepted the Ta'ssos Papado'poylos the epjdjajtisj'a and how many negotiated in Mpoy'rgkerstok. On 9 February 2004, the chairman Papado'poylos, accompanied from their D. Hrjsto'foa, N. Anastasja'di and G. Hostage left for the New York, corresponding in the invitation of general secretary Ko'fj Ana'n for meeting in the seat of UN. In the relative letter, the General Secretary wrote that it would consider the acceptance of his invitation as engagement of acceptance and terms that she had placed, so that is involved again in the Cypriot question, that is to say acceptance of timetables, epjdjajtisj'as and reference of his drawing in referendum. Up to then the stagnation was owed in the intolerance of Raoy'f Ntenkta's, who rejected globally the drawing. In the dues 2003, the Turkish Government had decided she advances with the drawing Ana'n with or without the collaboration of Ntenkta's, because the Cypriot question was connected with the European ambitions of Turkey. The Cypriot Government had the intense conviction that Turkish political had not changed and that the statements perj' change of policy were communication tactic of Erntoga'n. With the certainty that the Ntenkta's would lead the conference to shipwreck, the T. Papado'poylos left for the New York, via Athens. In the Greek capital became deliberation in the Palace Maxj'moy. There it was agreed it does not become it accepted epjdjajtisj'a. Refusal in epjdjajtisj'a In the first meeting that had the Papado'poylos and Ntenkta's with the Ko'fj Ana'n, on 10 February, the General Secretary placed the basic conditions in order to she undertakes initiative: If they begin the discussions, will be with base his drawing. The changes that would be sought would be few and no except the philosophy of drawing. Be satisfied the terms on the timetables and epjdjajtisj'a. According to informative note of Greek diplomats, Trjta'ri and Panago'poyloy, which watched the discussions in the New York, the T. Papado'poylos it developed the following place: "It observed that from result of discussions it will emerge how much will befall agreement, in order that it is submitted in referendum, suggesting that without agreement it is not possible is submitted the Drawing in referendum as such. With this way it indirectly expressed plin of course and his refusal to accept completion of important points that will not have been agreed at the negotiations by the General Secretary ". In the telegram it is reported that the attitude of Chairman was reliable with those who they were agreed in the meeting that had become the previous day with the Prime Minister Mr Simj'ti, in Athens. "It is marked", they report two ambassadors, "that what Mr Ntnekta's, in bigger part of discussions avoided she receives the reason, she hurried she agrees, possibly she outbids, in the above-mentioned point of intervention of chairman Papado'poyloy". The first shock Corresponding in the invitation of Ko'fj Ana'n to submit the two leaders thoughts for the modifications that sought in his drawing, the Ntenkta's ana'gnwse a written text that to him sent from Turkey, the content of which were completely irrelevant with his declared policy: "I was informed for the content of your meeting in the Ntavo's with the Prime Minister of Turkey, on 24 January 2004. I sympathise the opinions and the proposals that expressed in you Prime Minister Erntoga'n", reported the Ntenkta's. In the Ntavo's, the Erntoga'n ensured the Ana'n that Turkey would accept his terms, also included epjdjajtisj'as. The text that read the Ntenkta's was in the total his statement of faith in the new Turkish approach. "I came in the New York with political will, in spirit of reconciliation and with good faith, amining at the achievement balanced, viable and permanent solution, eyelpjstw' before 1 May", it reported the Ntenkta's. That moment collapsed all the background Greek-Cypriot "strategic". The absolute certainty that the Ntenkta's would reject the drawing and would cause impasse, as it had happened and in Hagen, it was altered in doubt and followingly in panic. Trjkoy'vertos kavga's The Ko'fj Ana'n you interrupt the meeting and it gave time in the two leaders to return the next day with ideas with regard to epjdjajtisj'a. The Papado'poylos called in their deliberation Hrjsto'fja, Anastasja'di and Hostage that him accompanied. The discussion between Anastasja'di and Papado'poyloy were so much intense, that them heard all the 34th floor of hotel Waldorf Astoria. In order that reports the chairman of DISY, Nikos Anastasja'dis, for the himself was evident that Turkey would revise completely her policy and that the Ntenktas would be arranged. "I asked from the Chairman to accept the proposal Ana'n for epjdjajtisj'a, as she was shaped in his letter, under the sect that will be confirmed the good will of Ntenkta's the negotiations. It did not want it hears. Him I asked how it would react if the Ntnekta's accepted epjdjajtisj'a. It answered that ' it is excluded accepts ' the Ntenkta's'. It had still not occupied what became, even if it invokes today his equitable crisis. ' Well ', and if it accepts, you make ', I insisted and addressing in the Chairman of his Parliament I said. ' To You it said ese'na Mr Hrjsto'fja ' The answer of Papado'poyloy was, ' then sees ' ". The next morning, the Ta'ssos Papado'poylos met with the American coordinator Sections Goye'ston, which him had encourages to send the known letter to the Ana'n, on 17 December 2003, calling him to undertake initiative for solution before 1 May. In a extremely interesting interview that is published in the book "Drawing Ana'n, the secret bargain", Mr Venjze'loy, M. Jgnatj'oy and N. Study, the Goye'ston describes the apo'gnwsi in which was found the T. Papado'poylos, when it realised that the things began to take unforeseen turn: "To Me it proposed da'ktylo and to me it said: ' I know who is person in charge for ' this crisis. I know that you can him stop if him you want. It was explicit that it was found in a situation that should it agrees in something which did not want. And believe that this had repercussions in all the rests ". "Yes" in the Turkish formula The same day, in the second meeting with the Ko'fj Ana'n, the T. Papado'poylos suffered an other shock. The Ntenkta's ane'gnwse an other text that to him was sent by Turkey, with which the Turkish side proposed a formula of surpassing of impasses, in the last stage of which the General Secretary would have the right in the epjdjajtisj'a ef' of all matter and not only in the completion of voids of drawing, as it was proposed in the invitation Ana'n.
According to telegram of Greek diplomats Trjta'ri and Panago'poyloy, the toyrkokyprjaki' proposal, "that at the phenomena was shaped with intervention or collaboration Turkey, USA and In. Nations, imports new elements, which in the substance, not only cover the proposal of I.E., but yperfalaggj'zoyn". The T. Papado'poylos, while in the first day it rejected with insistence epjdjajtisj'a with base the formula of I.E., the second day accepted asme'nws the Turkish formula. According to the same telegram, the Papado'poylos "declared in the G.G. of I.E. that [ Turkish ] proposal is moved in the right direction"! After the original decision to accept the Turkish formula for epjdjajtisj'a, the T. Papado'poylos asked time to deliberate with his collaborators and to come back. In deliberation of political heads, the Papado'poylos shared the Turkish proposal with notes by one's own hand for the improvements that should have been sought. "When I studied the paper, I remained astonished from the make that the paragraph for epjdjajtisj'a ef'olis the matter him they left intact. They did not propose no change ", it reports the N. Anastasja'dis.
Later began the interminable consultations in the UN in order to they lead to the final text. "In the impasse that was created", reports the Anastasja'dis, "proposed in the Chairman it escapes, asking acceptance of invitation Ana'n, as it had. ' No gentleman, him they will accept ', it was not his answer. Finally we decided all that under the circumstances it should we accept the text as it had been shaped at the long consultations ". The hour of triumph Afterwards the acceptance epjdjajtisj'as in the base of Turkish formula the T. Papado'poylos lent in the agreement of New York of character of triumph: "After enough months, where the Turkish side, and particularly Mr Ntenkta's, they characterized the drawing Ana'n as dead and camme'no and denied they arrive in discussions, we have achieved in order that the General Secretary undertakes new initiative and it calls the two sides in negotiations (...) They are our own handlings, that led the Turkish side to abandon completely the place and to come back in the table of negotiations with base the drawing Ana'n", said the T. Papado'poylos. Actually, it did not believe in this drawing. It was led to the agreement because it was trapped in a process that him followed with the certainty that him would reject the Ntenkta's. In order that reports the Goye'ston, the Papado'poylos it had not occupied that something changed in Turkey. "I do not believe that it could conceive this change. I believe that him it has not accomplished up to today "... After the personal defeat of New York, it returned in Cyprus and placed in application Drawing B: Reject the drawing the population in the referendum.
The D. Hrjsto'fjas declared the week that passed that it begged the T. Papado'poylo to place the "red lines of" Greek-Cypriot side, but denied pejsmatjka'. Answering the Governmental Representative, said that the Chairman gave a document with the "red lines of" two pages and epta'mjsj of lines. The "P" has ensured this document, that indeed records the "red lines of" Greek-Cypriot side. It has date of 10 March 2004 and it was delivered in the United Nations in the expiry of discussions, afterwards the submission of drawing Ana'n 4, that is to say when already they had finished all.
The I.E. asked this document from 18 March, but, in order that reports the General Secretary in his report, the T. Papado'poylos denied she negotiates. By the recent statements Hrjsto'fja and by those who it supports the N. Anastasja'dis from 2004, are confirmed the reports in the report Ana'n, that the T. Papado'poylos did not want it negotiates. After it was trapped in the N. York from his bad crisis and accepted something that him did not want, kate'strwse strategy of defeat: Writes relatively the Ana'n: "The Papado'poylos, in enough cases, was not available for discussions" because his other engagements in the Bo'rgenstock and in the Brussels ". (From the six available days the T. Papado'poylos left the two and went to the Brussels). "The toyrkokyprjaki' side and Turkey repeatedly they had asked list of priorities in answer theirs, reporting that they were allocated to satisfy certain requirements of Greekcypriots, as part of one it delivered". "While in certain sectors was achieved progress, via contacts in level of work, particularly on issues fortunes and residence". (Those who took the Greek-Cypriot side him claimed the Anastasja'dis, Kingdom and partly the Hrjsto'fjas). "It can be possible are satisfied also other Greek-Cypriot concerns, if the Greek-Cypriot side were more willing to be involved in Paros - you give in the Bo'rgenstock and previously and place in order of precedence the objectives"."
