Denizaksulu, you have brought up memories! I remember back in 1958 (i think) when as a very young elementary school pupil I participated in a demonstration, holding a Greek flag I could hardly carry, shouting rhythmically e,e,e,enosis!
Of course the armed struggle was for enosis. The right had a pathological urge for enosis and the communist left was also all for enosis because at first they thought communism was inevitable in Greecer, and later, when the left succumbed to Makarios, enosis became a national inspiration until 1967 when finally and after many defeats, Makarios dropped the desirable and went for the feasible.
Pyrpolyser has given us a great lesson in absurdity. He admires EOKA, he says, because they failed to unite Cyprus with Greece (that was their only aim) but managed to win independence. As if the Brits were to hold onto Cyprus forever! Independence (with much better provisions) was achieved by 99% of British colonies at the time, without spending one bullet.
It is so naive to claim that Britain left Cyprus because of EOKA. In fact Britain has not left at all, because of EOKA. The deal we signed in 1959 mirrors the defeat of EOKA and what it stood for. Of course if we look for heroes in order to perk us up then we can look at those who died, for those that survived are of the likes of Yorgatzis, Sampson and a few other fascist individuals.
I have no problem to say and I have written this before, that enosis was not totally unwarranted for the Greek Cypriots. I think the Greek Cypriots had every right to aspire for enosis. It does not matter if some people were not for enosis. It is the tactics used to bring about enosis that were wrong. Top of the list is the armed struggle. It buried enosis (is this really why you support it Pyrpolyser?) and secondly but extremely important, it did not take into consideration the fears and insecurities (real or imaginary) of our TC compatriots. If our struggle was for independence, the TC's would have been asked to participate in it.