The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


"Northern Cyprus" is the ultimate problem!

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby Get Real! » Mon Nov 05, 2007 2:07 am

phoenix wrote:
Get Real! wrote:
CopperLine wrote:North Cyprus is a lovely place. There's no obligation on visitors or tourists or residents to live on expropriated GC property. Come and visit some time.

We sassed you out ages ago Copperline but you denied your bias... Image


No, he must still be "neutral" because he admits they have expropriated GC properties . . . . :lol:

What's actually expropriated of foreigners living in the "TRNC" is their dignity or perhaps they never had any to begin with... :lol:
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 48333
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia

Postby Get Real! » Mon Nov 05, 2007 2:11 am

CopperLine wrote:Get Real, aka Sherlock, that would be 'come and visit' because as I write this post I am actually in Cyprus. Had I been in Canada I'd have written 'go and visit'. What a sleuth you are, nothing gets past you. Nothing.

Elementary... 8)
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 48333
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia

Postby Get Real! » Mon Nov 05, 2007 2:14 am

boomerang wrote:Read article 1 and wheep all you partitionists :lol:

http://www.icao.int/icaonet/dcs/7300_cons.pdf

It explains as to why the UK failed miserably in her attempt to have direct flights...

You forgot to mention that they'll have to R-Click and save to disk because it's a PDF (Acrobat).
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 48333
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia

Postby CopperLine » Mon Nov 05, 2007 2:15 am

So, Get Real, why have Turkish Airlines, Cyprus Turkish Airlines, Pegasus Airlines amongst others - all of whom fly to/from Ercan and to/from the UK not been subject to (a) sanction from the UK (a contracting party of ICAO), (b) sanction from ICAO itself, nor (c) has RoC 'taken ICAO to the ICJ' over these airlines' violations.
User avatar
CopperLine
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1558
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 9:04 pm

Postby phoenix » Mon Nov 05, 2007 2:16 am

Get Real! wrote:
phoenix wrote:
Get Real! wrote:
CopperLine wrote:North Cyprus is a lovely place. There's no obligation on visitors or tourists or residents to live on expropriated GC property. Come and visit some time.

We sassed you out ages ago Copperline but you denied your bias... Image


No, he must still be "neutral" because he admits they have expropriated GC properties . . . . :lol:

What's actually expropriated of foreigners living in the "TRNC" is their dignity or perhaps they never had any to begin with... :lol:


GR! It is only the indignant low-lifer's that would even consider moving there. Attracted only by cheapness, they have no morals or scruples. The whole place will be inhabited by the worst of mankind. I predict a meltdown . . . they WILL self-destruct! :lol:
User avatar
phoenix
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 3452
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 2:47 pm
Location: Free From Forum

Postby CopperLine » Mon Nov 05, 2007 2:22 am

Get Real! wrote:
CopperLine wrote:
"Can anyone seriously think the RoC will give its consent on such flights?"
But Boomerang the point is, following the example, that if Syria started flights to TRNC it wouldn't matter if RoC gave consent or not. RoC's consent would be irrelevant.

If Syria is a member of the ICAO then she has to abide by its rules!


Indeed, but 2 points : First, if Syria was recognising TRNC then it would merely be extending ICAO provisions to another state. Second, the earlier discussion was precisely about what incentives to abide or sanctions to deter Syria (or any other state) from recognising TRNC.
User avatar
CopperLine
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1558
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 9:04 pm

Postby CopperLine » Mon Nov 05, 2007 2:36 am

My dearest sweet, reasonable Phoenix of sound and balanced mind, whilst no doubt you've got reliable evidence that people in north Cyprus are "Attracted only by cheapness, and they have no morals or scruples" for myself I'm attracted by the flora and fauna. Just thought you should know. Obviously you can't carry both morals and scruples AND a camera - just too heavy isn't it. Tell you what, why don't you carry my morals while I take photos. As I said, north Cyprus is quite lovely, I should say beautiful : try it some time.
User avatar
CopperLine
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1558
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 9:04 pm

Postby boomerang » Mon Nov 05, 2007 2:37 am

Image

How could Syria extend ICAO provisions when article 1 and 2 prohibit her from doing so?

And actually Copperline I briefly read the articles and there is no mention of another state transfering any provisions to another state not alone an entity with UN res against her...

Maybe I missed them, could you please be kind enough to point these provisions out to me?
User avatar
boomerang
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 7337
Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 5:56 am

Postby Get Real! » Mon Nov 05, 2007 2:40 am

CopperLine wrote:So, Get Real, why have Turkish Airlines, Cyprus Turkish Airlines, Pegasus Airlines amongst others - all of whom fly to/from Ercan and to/from the UK not been subject to (a) sanction from the UK (a contracting party of ICAO), (b) sanction from ICAO itself, nor (c) has RoC 'taken ICAO to the ICJ' over these airlines' violations.

The first two are Turkish airlines but I don’t know the last. But anyway, Turkey’s international violations are so great and many that flying to and from Ercan seems to be the least of the worries of the international community. Even so, I’m not aware if the RoC has filed a complaint against Turkey with the ICAO.

What's going to be interesting is that soon Cyprus will become the official EU Mediterranean civil aviation hub which means that Turkey will have to register her every civil aviation move with Cyprus! :lol:
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 48333
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia

Postby boomerang » Mon Nov 05, 2007 2:44 am

I wonder who and how these flights are insured...
User avatar
boomerang
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 7337
Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 5:56 am

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests