Cyprus-Forum.com

[Get Real!]

Get Real,

First I did not suggest that world was 'lawless' - where did you get that idea ?

Right here:

So again, if flights came to /from Syria or Germany or anywhere else - without touching down in Turkey - the most that RoC could do is express its outrage and threaten or actually impose some kind of sanctions aganist the violators. That is a political decision, not a matter of law.

[boomerang]

From ICAO web site

Scheduled air services

No scheduled international air services may be operated over or into the territory of a contracting state, except with the special permission or other authorization of that State, and in accordance with the terms of such permission or authorization.

The state here is the RoC...Can anyone seriously think the RoC will give its consent on such flights? The english have tried but failed miserably...Because to succeed you have to break the agreement you signed...

Hence GR is correct when he makes a reference to lawlessness...

ICAO will only recognize states and not ethnic cleansers as per UN resolutions...

[CopperLine]

Get Real,

First I did not suggest that world was 'lawless' - where did you get that idea ?

Right here:

So again, if flights came to /from Syria or Germany or anywhere else - without touching down in Turkey - the most that RoC could do is express its outrage and threaten or actually impose some kind of sanctions aganist the violators. That is a political decision, not a matter of law.

Get Real,
So I didn't say 'lawless', you did. Saying something is not a matter of law is wholly different from saying that the world is lawless. These words are utterly different in meaning.

[Get Real!]

North Cyprus is a lovely place. There's no obligation on visitors or tourists or residents to live on expropriated GC property. Come and visit some time.

We sassed you out ages ago Copperline but you denied your bias...

[CopperLine]

"Can anyone seriously think the RoC will give its consent on such flights?"

But Boomerang the point is, following the example, that if Syria started flights to TRNC it wouldn't matter if RoC gave consent or not. RoC's consent would be irrelevant.

[Get Real!]

"Can anyone seriously think the RoC will give its consent on such flights?"

But Boomerang the point is, following the example, that if Syria started flights to TRNC it wouldn't matter if RoC gave consent or not. RoC's consent would be irrelevant.

If Syria is a member of the ICAO then she has to abide by its rules!

[phoenix]

North Cyprus is a lovely place. There's no obligation on visitors or tourists or residents to live on expropriated GC property. Come and visit some time.

We sassed you out ages ago Copperline but you denied your bias...

No, he must still be "neutral" because he admits they have expropriated GC properties . . . .

[CopperLine]

Get Real, aka Sherlock, that would be 'come and visit' because as I write this post I am actually in Cyprus. Had I been in Canada I'd have written 'go and visit'. What a sleuth you are, nothing gets past you. Nothing.

[boomerang]

Copperline you seemed to be missing the point...If Syria is a signatury to the Convention then she will be breaking the law, to which she signed, by allowing such services...

And the next question that begs an answer, why have a convention if you are gonna break it when it suits you?

So in this case Syria would be asked by ICAO to explain and then to be told to rectify it as per her signature...

[boomerang]

Read article 1 and wheep all you partitionists

http://www.icao.int/icaonet/dcs/7300_cons.pdf

It explains as to why the UK failed miserably in her attempt to have direct flights...