The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Relations between Cyprus and Britain worsen

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby Viewpoint » Sat Nov 17, 2007 9:29 am

Kifeas wrote:
joe wrote:
Daemon wrote:
You don’t have to explain me a shit like I’ve said above, but unfortunately you have responsibilities especially now that by a mistake they made you a European (evro-peo xoris to evro).


I have answered to everything and i will do it again if you can’t go back and see my answers.


You must understand that my responsibility and loyalty lies to this republic. There will be no plan accepted that would support giving Turkish troops the right to intervene in the Greek Cypriot state of the "URoC." My responsibility was to understand this plan and what it represented and i have fulfilled my responsibility by voting this plan down.


Why Joe? If this right of intervention would have been given only for the so-called TC state, would you have accepted it? I personally wouldn't accept it either!


Why is that?
User avatar
Viewpoint
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 25214
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: Nicosia/Lefkosa

Postby Kifeas » Sat Nov 17, 2007 10:11 am

Viewpoint wrote:
Kifeas wrote:
joe wrote:
Daemon wrote:
You don’t have to explain me a shit like I’ve said above, but unfortunately you have responsibilities especially now that by a mistake they made you a European (evro-peo xoris to evro).


I have answered to everything and i will do it again if you can’t go back and see my answers.


You must understand that my responsibility and loyalty lies to this republic. There will be no plan accepted that would support giving Turkish troops the right to intervene in the Greek Cypriot state of the "URoC." My responsibility was to understand this plan and what it represented and i have fulfilled my responsibility by voting this plan down.


Why Joe? If this right of intervention would have been given only for the so-called TC state, would you have accepted it? I personally wouldn't accept it either!


Why is that?


Why what?
User avatar
Kifeas
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4927
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 10:19 am
Location: Lapithos, Kyrenia, now Pafos; Cyprus.

Postby Viewpoint » Sat Nov 17, 2007 10:19 am

Kifeas
Why Joe? If this right of intervention would have been given only for the so-called TC state, would you have accepted it? I personally wouldn't accept it either!


Any clearer now?? Why do you find it so difficult to compromise? I can understand you not wanting Turkish intervention in the GC state but surely the TC state has the rigth to protection in timezs of crisis if that should be necessary.
User avatar
Viewpoint
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 25214
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: Nicosia/Lefkosa

Postby Kikapu » Sat Nov 17, 2007 10:42 am

Viewpoint wrote:Kifeas
Why Joe? If this right of intervention would have been given only for the so-called TC state, would you have accepted it? I personally wouldn't accept it either!


Any clearer now?? Why do you find it so difficult to compromise? I can understand you not wanting Turkish intervention in the GC state but surely the TC state has the rigth to protection in timezs of crisis if that should be necessary.


What, you mean right now, where Ankara dictates what goes on in the "TRNC". So if and when Turkey needs to interfere in Cypriot affairs, whether a reason is warranted or not, you are willing to help Turkey by providing them a reason to interfere. In another words, you are not willing to be an "Independent TC state". If that is the case, why even bother to change anything on the ground as they are now, which may be the reasons as why not too much has changed on the ground for the last 33 years, except the "Independent GC state" as you call it, which is also known as the Republic of Cyprus, has moved miles ahead economically than the Occupied "TRNC" because it has chosen to be interfered by Turkey. Unless you are willing to stand on your own two feet and be part of the "Union", (North & South) in a True Federation, you do not have the right or be trusted, to have Turkey interfere anytime and every time you want to change the situation on the ground. It is time for you to grow up and be an ADULT to handle your own affairs and not your BIG BROTHER.
User avatar
Kikapu
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 18050
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 6:18 pm

Postby Viewpoint » Sat Nov 17, 2007 1:25 pm

Kikapu wrote:
Viewpoint wrote:Kifeas
Why Joe? If this right of intervention would have been given only for the so-called TC state, would you have accepted it? I personally wouldn't accept it either!


Any clearer now?? Why do you find it so difficult to compromise? I can understand you not wanting Turkish intervention in the GC state but surely the TC state has the rigth to protection in timezs of crisis if that should be necessary.


What, you mean right now, where Ankara dictates what goes on in the "TRNC". So if and when Turkey needs to interfere in Cypriot affairs, whether a reason is warranted or not, you are willing to help Turkey by providing them a reason to interfere. In another words, you are not willing to be an "Independent TC state". If that is the case, why even bother to change anything on the ground as they are now, which may be the reasons as why not too much has changed on the ground for the last 33 years, except the "Independent GC state" as you call it, which is also known as the Republic of Cyprus, has moved miles ahead economically than the Occupied "TRNC" because it has chosen to be interfered by Turkey. Unless you are willing to stand on your own two feet and be part of the "Union", (North & South) in a True Federation, you do not have the right or be trusted, to have Turkey interfere anytime and every time you want to change the situation on the ground. It is time for you to grow up and be an ADULT to handle your own affairs and not your BIG BROTHER.


The TCs grew up in 1963 and again in 2004 when they were shown what GCs really think about unification. But we all say not lets dwell on the past, try to learn from it on move on to build a better future. You are right TCs will not budge one inch unless they can clearly see that unification will be beneficial to their future. Right now no TCs have under very difficult circumstances progress to a level better than some of the last countries to enter the EU. If you compare the south with Switzerland or other prosperous countries then the south can be viewed just like behind in economic development but never forget the isolation and restrictions we face when trying to improve economically.

Now when we come back to having Turkey interfere in a TC state where we are recognized and in a union with a GC state, do you think TCs allowed the opportunity to stand on their own 2 feet economically will allow Turkey to interfere then you do not know TCs very well, we would only want them to intervene if our lives were at risk or the GC state was trying to undo the agreement as they did back in 1963.(that's the part of learning form the past) so you may adopt a flippant attitude but it doesn't change the reality that GC will never get Turkey out of the equation unless TCs have reason to want them out and to date GCs have been unsuccessful in persuading or showing TCs otherwise.
User avatar
Viewpoint
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 25214
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: Nicosia/Lefkosa

Postby QAMERSLAND » Sat Nov 17, 2007 1:38 pm

Kifeas wrote:
Nikitas wrote:There is plenty tht can be done. I will not go into it now, but to give one outlandish example:

Cyprus formally announced that it cedes territory to the TRNC and simultaneously recognises the new nation. That leaves the British base areas totally under Cyprus control and it will be payback time. It is an extreme scenario but possible.


Nikitas, the only "outlandish" I see is the post itself, unless of cource if you were jocking!

Cyprus can take numerous actions against Britain, starting from the millions of owed rent from the use of the bases all these years.

Cyprus may choose to take the UK to the European Community court, for acting profoundly outside the letter and the spirit of the EU aqui, and ask for the reversal of the latest Turko-British agreement! The latest Turko-British agreement is illegal in the face of EU aqui, for it blatantly constitutes an interference of one EU member state into the internal affairs of another. It constitutes a side-stepping and a by-passing of the RoC for issues pertaining to its sovereignty, and it is contrary to the treaty of accession in which the status of the occupied areas is defined to be within the sovereignty of the RoC! After all, the TCs are EU citizens only by virtue of them being citizens of the RoC, and not citizens of the old Albion! If Britain thinks the RoC violates any of the rights of the TC community or it doesn’t fulfil its obligations deriving from the EU aqui, it can only ask the EU to take action against Cyprus through the relevant EU courts; and not act unilaterally, behind its back, for matters concerning the internal affairs of another EU member state!

Furthermore, Cyprus may chose to take the UK to the European court of Justice, for not fulfilling or for acting outside and contrary to its obligations as a guarantor power for the independence and sovereignty of the RoC!

Furthermore, it may choose not to "cooperate" with the UK, in the EU, on political decisions crucial for British interests!


wish cyprus could do something! i feel cyprus like roaring clouds cant rain :)

Cyprus is just treatheing UK to stop relations with Turkey. cyprus will not do anything at the moment as the back bone of cyprus economy is the tourists from uk.

Any harsh step by papadopoulos will simply sucide for cyprus

May God guide him so he can take the right decision which the best in favour of Cyprus
QAMERSLAND
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 288
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:51 pm

Postby Kifeas » Sat Nov 17, 2007 2:42 pm

Viewpoint wrote:
Kikapu wrote:
Viewpoint wrote:Kifeas
Why Joe? If this right of intervention would have been given only for the so-called TC state, would you have accepted it? I personally wouldn't accept it either!


Any clearer now?? Why do you find it so difficult to compromise? I can understand you not wanting Turkish intervention in the GC state but surely the TC state has the rigth to protection in timezs of crisis if that should be necessary.


What, you mean right now, where Ankara dictates what goes on in the "TRNC". So if and when Turkey needs to interfere in Cypriot affairs, whether a reason is warranted or not, you are willing to help Turkey by providing them a reason to interfere. In another words, you are not willing to be an "Independent TC state". If that is the case, why even bother to change anything on the ground as they are now, which may be the reasons as why not too much has changed on the ground for the last 33 years, except the "Independent GC state" as you call it, which is also known as the Republic of Cyprus, has moved miles ahead economically than the Occupied "TRNC" because it has chosen to be interfered by Turkey. Unless you are willing to stand on your own two feet and be part of the "Union", (North & South) in a True Federation, you do not have the right or be trusted, to have Turkey interfere anytime and every time you want to change the situation on the ground. It is time for you to grow up and be an ADULT to handle your own affairs and not your BIG BROTHER.


The TCs grew up in 1963 and again in 2004 when they were shown what GCs really think about unification. But we all say not lets dwell on the past, try to learn from it on move on to build a better future. You are right TCs will not budge one inch unless they can clearly see that unification will be beneficial to their future. Right now no TCs have under very difficult circumstances progress to a level better than some of the last countries to enter the EU. If you compare the south with Switzerland or other prosperous countries then the south can be viewed just like behind in economic development but never forget the isolation and restrictions we face when trying to improve economically.

Now when we come back to having Turkey interfere in a TC state where we are recognized and in a union with a GC state, do you think TCs allowed the opportunity to stand on their own 2 feet economically will allow Turkey to interfere then you do not know TCs very well, we would only want them to intervene if our lives were at risk or the GC state was trying to undo the agreement as they did back in 1963.(that's the part of learning form the past) so you may adopt a flippant attitude but it doesn't change the reality that GC will never get Turkey out of the equation unless TCs have reason to want them out and to date GCs have been unsuccessful in persuading or showing TCs otherwise.

The (any) "reunification" agreement is not going to be between a so-called GC and a so-called TC state! This is something you should clear out of your mind! The agreement will only be between the GC and TC communities, as they are understood under the 1960 constitution and as they have been negotiating so far! The notion that after a solution, the TC community will strictly and exclusively identify themselves with the "TC" state, and the GC community with the "GC" state, is wrong and as far as the GCs are concerned, totally unacceptable!

The two notions or entities (i.e. Communities vs. States,) should be separated! It is one thing to say that potentially the "TC" state will have a majority of residents originating from the TC community, and the GC one respectively, or that the "TC" state's government apparatus will use Turkish as its working language, etc; and another thing to say that the 30% of Cyprus that will potentially constitute the territory of the so-called TC state, will change title deeds and will become or pass to the ownership of the TC community, alone, as its own "inherited" ethnic land or territory; so that the TC community will be assuming the right to be doing whatever it wishes or pleases in that part of Cyprus!

The states will be mere administrative divisions of one federal country, and their constituent power on the level of their government competencies will be vested on their permanent residents alone, irrespective of which community they originate from! We won’t gift you 30% of our country, and on top of it we will accept you as co-partners on the central (federal) level, on this basis! If you want your own exclusively TC country, you can only do so on the 18 %(-) of Cyprus territory (and the 18% of the coastline; ) but not on the 30% of terittory plus 50% of the coastline of Cyprus, just because you are Turks and thus you beilive that "one of you should worth the whole word," or because you think "you won the war" in 1974 and thus we should be the ones to capitulate to your capricious irredentism!

There is no GC that is willing to make such a compromise to you, and if there are a few, in most GC’s books they are homosexual masochistic perverts of very submissive natures that should immediately be examined by psychiatrists!
User avatar
Kifeas
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4927
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 10:19 am
Location: Lapithos, Kyrenia, now Pafos; Cyprus.

Postby Nikitas » Sat Nov 17, 2007 5:22 pm

Kifeas,

Of course I was joking, that is why I termed the proposal outlandish. I am a Famagusta boy, and the only area of Cyprus I know well is Karpasia. I do not forget!
Nikitas
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 7420
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 2:49 pm

Postby Daemon » Sat Nov 17, 2007 10:15 pm

There is no GC that is willing to make such a compromise to you, and if there are a few, in most GC’s books they are homosexual masochistic perverts of very submissive natures that should immediately be examined by psychiatrists!


What a coincidence!!! I believe the same for the idiots that have vote yes to keep in Cyprus 50 000 Turkish troops and gave the green light for Turkey accession with out any exchange, it’s obviously masochistic and mental sick for some perverts that need a very skillful psychiatrist to take care of them (I suggest Mikelides).

In the other hand the TC’s with the 1/3 of GC’s in the north state had the 29% of the land in a political level and every Cypriot citizen had Cyprus in the whole in a united scheme and the Turks far away from European Cyprus.
Daemon
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 515
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 3:05 pm

Postby miltiades » Sat Nov 17, 2007 10:49 pm

Daemon wrote:
There is no GC that is willing to make such a compromise to you, and if there are a few, in most GC’s books they are homosexual masochistic perverts of very submissive natures that should immediately be examined by psychiatrists!


What a coincidence!!! I believe the same for the idiots that have vote yes to keep in Cyprus 50 000 Turkish troops and gave the green light for Turkey accession with out any exchange, it’s obviously masochistic and mental sick for some perverts that need a very skillful psychiatrist to take care of them (I suggest Mikelides).

In the other hand the TC’s with the 1/3 of GC’s in the north state had the 29% of the land in a political level and every Cypriot citizen had Cyprus in the whole in a united scheme and the Turks far away from European Cyprus.

What the hell are you on about mate , are you on drugs or what , your gibbering away loads of nonsense !
User avatar
miltiades
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 19837
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 10:01 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests