The trial of lawyer Medeni Ayhan launched yesterday and is proceeding in accordance with the new penal code.
Milliyet points out that it was in the first time in the country that "opining for the fact of Armenian massacres" is considered a crime. "If Ayhan is condemned for his views then the 216th article of the new penal code can be applied for those putting forward views opposing the state thesis. Thus, many intellectuals holding to different views than the official one will face trial as Ayhan
YeReVaN wrote:The trial of lawyer Medeni Ayhan launched yesterday and is proceeding in accordance with the new penal code.
Milliyet points out that it was in the first time in the country that "opining for the fact of Armenian massacres" is considered a crime. "If Ayhan is condemned for his views then the 216th article of the new penal code can be applied for those putting forward views opposing the state thesis. Thus, many intellectuals holding to different views than the official one will face trial as Ayhan
If they can not jail him, why is the trial already is process?
Because jailing you need a trial.And If you are innocent there wont be a jailing. Isnt this way a standart way? Someone just accused him until now.
.
By the way article 312 is article in old code. It becomes 216 in new code
This means that along with the expression "Armenian genocide" the "Armenian massacres" is also viewed as a penal action prosecuted by two -- 216 and 305 -- articles. The trial of lawyer Medeni Ayhan launched yesterday and is proceeding in accordance with the new penal code.
"If Ayhan is condemned for his views then the 216th article of the new penal code can be applied for those putting forward views opposing the state thesis. Thus, many intellectuals holding to different views than the official one will face trial as Ayhan".
Return to Politics and Elections
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests