The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Papadopoulos has completely lost it!

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby bg_turk » Mon Oct 29, 2007 7:56 pm

ARMENIAN CYPRIOT wrote: Halil could this be do to the fact that this country claimed land from Greece??


That is utter nonsense. The Macedonian constitution has a clause which explicitly states that Macedonia has no territorial ambitions towards any of its neighbors and respects their territorial integrity. Maybe Turkey should derecognize Armenia for having as a national symbol something that is located beyond its boundaries and in Turkish territory.
User avatar
bg_turk
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1172
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 11:24 pm
Location: Bulgaria

Re: Papadopoulos has completely lost it!

Postby Pyrpolizer » Mon Oct 29, 2007 8:01 pm

Kifeas wrote:Of course Bananiot, Papadopoulos would not have fallen for Denktash proposal! Don’t you know why? You do of course, but as always you choose to deceive the unaware forum members, through half truths and distortions!

Let me ask you, why do you choose to hide the fact that what Papadopoulos rejected and buried was not called Annan plan, simply because there wasn’t a single one Annan plan, but five instead? Why don’t you tell people that what Papadopoulos eventually (rightfully) buried was called Annan plan 5, and what Denktash was proposing him to burry was called Annan plan 2?

Why don’t you tell them the difference between the one and the other, and that there was a gradual shift of philosophy among the various Annan plan versions; starting from a federation formula without virgin births and on the basis of a RoC evolution (an anathema for Denktash and the rest of partitionists, but one that would have been potentially accepted by both the GC and TC societies –remember the pro-Annan demonstrations by thousands of TCs in the streets at the time;) and ending up with a profound virgin birth confederative formula in Annan plan 5 with all the elements of a disguised partition in place, a blessing for Denktash and an anathema for the GCs this time?

Of course Papadopoulos naturally would not have wanted to make such a favour to Denktash, to accept to burry something that could have been acceptable in theory by the GC society, in spite of the fact that it was not yet complete (Annan plans 1, 2 & 3!) After all he wanted a solution, and this is evidence to the fact that he indeed does!


You give the impression that if the gaps in Anan Plan 2 or 3 were filled up taking the middle position of the 2 sides that they would be accepted by the GCs.

Imo they would still be rejected if not by 76% the at least by 67%. They were all bad. Simply version 5 was the worst.
Maybe the Political or power sharing of Anan Plan 3 would be accepted but what about the major issues that BURN the average refugee?? No way...
User avatar
Pyrpolizer
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12893
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 11:33 pm

Postby Daemon » Mon Oct 29, 2007 10:50 pm

Let me ask you, why do you choose to hide the fact that what Papadopoulos rejected and buried was not called Annan plan, simply because there wasn’t a single one Annan plan, but five instead? Why don’t you tell people that what Papadopoulos eventually (rightfully) buried was called Annan plan 5, and what Denktash was proposing him to burry was called Annan plan 2?


You people are hilarious and don’t have a single brain cell alive, your brains are completely destroyed.

If that it was the case mister brain-dead why everyone tries to present the good side of the Anan plan is attacked by your trash government and the brain dead people like your self?

The Anan plan 5 have even better provisions in some issues even if your outdated old pervert president didn’t negotiate (like Omirou admitted) but because of the people that was with him was actually forcing for some standards.

Why don’t you tell them the difference between the one and the other, and that there was a gradual shift of philosophy among the various Annan plan versions; starting from a federation formula without virgin births and on the basis of a RoC evolution (an anathema for Denktash and the rest of partitionists, but one that would have been potentially accepted by both the GC and TC societies –remember the pro-Annan demonstrations by thousands of TCs in the streets at the time;) and ending up with a profound virgin birth confederative formula in Annan plan 5 with all the elements of a disguised partition in place, a blessing for Denktash and an anathema for the GCs this time?


Who you are trying to fool men, other than your self and the other braindead?

The virgin birth was decided by UN at 1999.

with all the elements of a disguised partition in place


What an unbelievable freaking bullshit. I’m fucking challenge your craven bitch to prove me that and I’ll admit what your freak president is a hero.
Daemon
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 515
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 3:05 pm

Postby Bananiot » Mon Oct 29, 2007 11:05 pm

Let's bring back Annan Plan No. 3! What a joke! Does anyone remember the Pancyprian Movement of Citizens? This is the same Movement which came out the other day in support of Papadopoulos's candidacy (surprise-surprise). This movement organised loud gatherings from the first day Annan announced his intentions. These gatherings were attended by DIKO members and top brass, of the likes of Aggelides, Koulias, the Bishop of Kyrenia and other fanatics. They started the racket and their distortions, praying on the fears of our xenophobic and introvert people, eventually won the day for the rejectionists. These people could not move even their small finger without getting the green light from their boss. Aggelides wrote once: Papadopoulos by himself is DIKO. Papadopoulos by himself is Cyprus.
User avatar
Bananiot
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6397
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 10:51 pm
Location: Nicosia

Postby Daemon » Mon Oct 29, 2007 11:41 pm

May i remind you that according to Makarios Droushiotis, the Russians did not comply not because they made US a favor, but because Turkey also asked them the same thing (with serious returns). And that they admitted later it is the Turks that they served not us


I have never hear about that again and it is strange what I’ve said exactly the same thing with out the sources of Drousiotis and just by watching the news and by my knowledge of the religions (the worst mass illness ever) and I have said that from the very first day that I learned about what the Russians did. And I was speaking about the dangers of our relations with the Russians (and generally the orthodox like the neo-Nazi Serbs). And the role of the priests was huge on what happened while they may even have influence to that old pervert president who is also a big sinner and he may wanted to go to heaven while his days are ending and he will soon have to face the Jew prophets in the Jew hell.

ps: It’s not a reply to Pyrpolizer is just my thoughts on this.
Daemon
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 515
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 3:05 pm

Postby DT. » Tue Oct 30, 2007 12:42 am

Daemon wrote:
May i remind you that according to Makarios Droushiotis, the Russians did not comply not because they made US a favor, but because Turkey also asked them the same thing (with serious returns). And that they admitted later it is the Turks that they served not us


I have never hear about that again and it is strange what I’ve said exactly the same thing with out the sources of Drousiotis and just by watching the news and by my knowledge of the religions (the worst mass illness ever) and I have said that from the very first day that I learned about what the Russians did. And I was speaking about the dangers of our relations with the Russians (and generally the orthodox like the neo-Nazi Serbs). And the role of the priests was huge on what happened while they may even have influence to that old pervert president who is also a big sinner and he may wanted to go to heaven while his days are ending and he will soon have to face the Jew prophets in the Jew hell.

ps: It’s not a reply to Pyrpolizer is just my thoughts on this.


:shock: what?

red pills monday blue pills Sunday.....QUIT MIXING THEM UP!!!
User avatar
DT.
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12684
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 8:34 pm
Location: Lefkosia

Postby Daemon » Tue Oct 30, 2007 12:46 am

Yes and you can make your pray to that Joshua and go for sleep. And the morning go to church to kiss the hands of some pervert in black :lol:

Image

Of course the religion had play a huge role on what happened because they are again for one time in their pathetic existence reacting against reason with the conspirology of the Satan that is always coming from the west. And your archbishop (afto to arxiarxidi) is involved more than enough with politics and this bullshits can not be accepted in Europe. They was even sending the different opinion to hell :lol:
Last edited by Daemon on Tue Oct 30, 2007 1:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
Daemon
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 515
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 3:05 pm

Postby ARMENIAN CYPRIOT » Tue Oct 30, 2007 1:08 am

bg_turk wrote:
ARMENIAN CYPRIOT wrote: Halil could this be do to the fact that this country claimed land from Greece??


That is utter nonsense. The Macedonian constitution has a clause which explicitly states that Macedonia has no territorial ambitions towards any of its neighbors and respects their territorial integrity. Maybe Turkey should derecognize Armenia for having as a national symbol something that is located beyond its boundaries and in Turkish territory.

Your response is nonesence. This clause was placed into there constitution after Greece forced the change. Do some research and get back to me later, Pomak. Let them, Russia would love it. :wink: Big difference, is Armenians lived in Ararat,where Slavs didnt come to Macedonia until 1000. PS Pomak, they also had claims on Bulgarian territory and if you were a real Bulgarian I am sure you would have known that. :lol: :lol: :wink:
User avatar
ARMENIAN CYPRIOT
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1141
Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2005 6:51 am

Postby Salonikios » Tue Oct 30, 2007 12:05 pm

Papadopoulos is the biggest Greek politician of his era.Hope he continues to resist Turkey and USA the way he did in the past and does now.
Salonikios
New Member
New Member
 
Posts: 28
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 9:22 pm

Postby halil » Tue Oct 30, 2007 1:00 pm

Salonikios wrote:Papadopoulos is the biggest Greek politician of his era.Hope he continues to resist Turkey and USA the way he did in the past and does now.


Greek politician or Cypriot politician ????????????????
halil
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 8804
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 2:21 pm
Location: nicosia

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests