by CopperLine » Mon Oct 15, 2007 10:09 pm
Piratis and others want to claim that there is an unbroken line of Cypriots for 3,500 years of which tens of thousands remain in Cyprus today. I suppose we're going to have to go round the houses on this one again.
First, unless Piratis is claiming an unbroken blood line then s/he has to define Cypriot some other way such as culture, language, religion and so on.
Second, if Piratis is indeed claiming a bloodline then it should be a simple task to find those pure and uncontaminated Cypriots shouldn't it Piratis ? So despite three and a half millenia of invasion, intermarriage etc, Piratis is claiming that you can still find tens of thousands of these true Cypriots (all in the south, just by chance, and none abroad it seems). But how could you and I tell who these people are ? A blood test ? Different features ? Different attitudes ? Different politics ? But what have those last two got to do with biological/blood lines ?
Third, let's try language. Perhaps this unbroken line is made up of Greek speakers, perhaps that's who Piratis' 10,000 refers to ? Except the Greek of 3,500 years ago bears an extremely tenuous relationship with that of 2007. Moreover most Greek speakers of today would not have a clue what was being said by a Greek speaker of, 500 years let alone of 3,500 years ago. So language as a carrier of identity doesn't do the job either.
(My god, the irony of this : here we are, Piratis, discussing through the medium of English not Greek. That you use the English language here does not mean that you are English. That I speak English, German, Spanish, Portugese, French, Turkish and Greek does not make me English, German, Spanish, Portugese, French, Turkish or Greek
Fourth, let's try culture. Again what is common to people of today and those of 3,500 years ago ? Or a thousand years ago ? Virtually nothing, not even the ritual of the Orthodox church, even assuming that people were held by Orthodox rites. If this unbroken culture how is it that we all have to be 'reminded' of its unbrokenness by your references to bronze age trading through 21st century web links.
Fifth, the idea of a distinct Cypriot people did not emerge until the early 20th century. Those people living in Cyprus 500 years ago, a thousand years ago did not conceive of themselves as Cypriot. If they were not Cypriot until the idea of a Cypriot national people emerged in the 20th century then, logically, one cannot trace a Cypriot line back 3,500 years !
You will not find any textual or other evidence in, say, 1500 where people are saying 'we are the Cypriot people'. You will find lots of evidence pointing out who were regarded as foreigners, whether welcome or not; you will find lots of evidence of peoples speaking different languages; of conveying different cultural mores and customs; but you will not find self-declarations of Cypriotness.
What Piratis and his ilk have to do is invent or imagine an unbroken and pure line for the purposes of excluding others whose politics s/he doesn't like.