denizaksulu wrote:Get Real! wrote:CopperLine wrote:Piratis, GR,
So how exactly would a 'KRET' or Kurdistan in eastern Turkey (a) hasten the resolution of the Cyprus problem and (b) hasten the restoration of Armenian national rights ? Or are your proposals simply to annoy Turkey and to encourage the killings of yet more innocents ?
Please consider the following…
1. The probability that Turkey will ever WILLINGLY cede territory for the creation of a Turkish Kurdish state (KRET) is next to zero.
2. The probability that Iraq, Iran, Syria, and Turkey will ever SIMULTANEOUSLY agree to relinquish their corresponding Kurdish territories towards the creation of Kurdistan is even smaller.
Given the above what safe assumptions can one make?
The safest assumption we make is that you are Number One '----' stirer. Your only intention on this forum is to agitate TCs. Period. I for one never gets agitated.
Apart from that I believe Article One in the Rep. of Turkey Constitution says that Turkey is a whole and is Indivisible. Or was that something to do with the structure of the atom? That was wrong too. Turkey will keep on fighting as it is now. Pity reallly. All these innocent lives. Your support for these PKK terrorists will only prolong the suffering of the people in Eastern Turkey. Whats your new chosen name (for your gream) - KRETinistan?
Erratum/Correction:
Article 4 includes what I described as Turkey being Indivisible.
"The Constitution asserts that Turkey is a secular and democratic republic, deriving its sovereignty from the people. The sovereignty rests with the Turkish Nation, who delegates its exercise to an elected unicameral parliament, the Turkish Grand National Assembly. Moreover, Article 4 declares the immovability the founding principles of the Republic defined in the first three Articles, "laïcité, social equality, equality before law, the Republican form of government, the indivisibility of the Republic and of the Turkish Nation", and bans any proposals for their modification. The preamble also invokes the principles of nationalism, defined as the "material and spiritual well-being of the Republic". Thus, it sets out to found a unitary nation-state based on the principles of secular democracy.
It also establishes a separation of powers between the three main powers of the state. The separation of powers between the legislative and the executive is a loose one, whereas the one between the executive and the legislative with the judiciary is a strict one.
Regards