shahmaran wrote:phoenix wrote:shahmaran wrote:Monkeys could have done a better job thats for sure!
Is that what you've discovered since Turkey has been running you?
I personally do not think that the ones who are running Turkey are any better to be honest...
zan wrote:Bloody heck....It's the planet of tthe Apes all over again....Is that why Bush walks the way he does....
Nikitas wrote:Shah wrote:
"I believe the mass graves contained not only men, but women children and old men too, so it wasn't just a case of eliminating the number of potential fighters, rather a total eradication of the population at that location due to their ethnicity.
This is what genocide is! "
So we can say that the TUrkish Cypriot gunmen who carried out the Afania massacre were committing genocide of Greek Cypriots? Same for Omorphita in 1958?
After the fall of Famagusta, the Turkish army turned north, into Karpasia, where there were no military personnel. They killed great numbers of Greek Cypriot civilians in Karpasia- read the Sunday Times of September 1974, a report titled "Something Terrible Happened Here" complete with photographs of Greek Cypriot civilians killed and left where they fell. When a NATO style organized army does that, is that evidence of genocide? The Cypriot irregulars of both sides can be said to have acted in an organized ad hoc manner, but the army? Where there orders to do it? Any soldier tried for killing civilians in Karpasia? Any officer lose his command?
"And no one really knows where they would have stopped if Turkey had not intervened..." Can you name one single Turkish Cypriot casualty before the start of the invasion in 1974? I searched and found none. This assertion is an outright lie. The intercommunal clashes started only after the invasion began. For the most part it was limited to temporary hostage taking. In some instances like Afania, Maratha and Tochni it turned into massacres of civilians. Both communities were involved. As for the 1600 missing read Dentash's explanation to see cynicism at its best!
Nikitas wrote:Shah wrote:
"I believe the mass graves contained not only men, but women children and old men too, so it wasn't just a case of eliminating the number of potential fighters, rather a total eradication of the population at that location due to their ethnicity.
This is what genocide is! "
So we can say that the TUrkish Cypriot gunmen who carried out the Afania massacre were committing genocide of Greek Cypriots? Same for Omorphita in 1958?
After the fall of Famagusta, the Turkish army turned north, into Karpasia, where there were no military personnel. They killed great numbers of Greek Cypriot civilians in Karpasia- read the Sunday Times of September 1974, a report titled "Something Terrible Happened Here" complete with photographs of Greek Cypriot civilians killed and left where they fell. When a NATO style organized army does that, is that evidence of genocide? The Cypriot irregulars of both sides can be said to have acted in an organized ad hoc manner, but the army? Where there orders to do it? Any soldier tried for killing civilians in Karpasia? Any officer lose his command?
"And no one really knows where they would have stopped if Turkey had not intervened..." Can you name one single Turkish Cypriot casualty before the start of the invasion in 1974? I searched and found none. This assertion is an outright lie. The intercommunal clashes started only after the invasion began. For the most part it was limited to temporary hostage taking. In some instances like Afania, Maratha and Tochni it turned into massacres of civilians. Both communities were involved. As for the 1600 missing read Dentash's explanation to see cynicism at its best!
zan wrote:The two sides were in completely different situations. We were confined to 3% of our own country and basically left to rot. Unemployed and poor. You guys had the run of the country in all aspects. We were the forgotten people. We were surrounded by hostile forces that had double crossed us before. Then the killing started as the coupists made their move...Cypriots were being killed and we thought we would be next when the GCs secured the island and once again stopped Turkey from intervening. Our positions in Girne and a few other strongholds were attacked before Turkey arrived so what were they using....Blanks......Lets get this whole thing into perspective and then we might actually move on. The myth that we were attacked only after Turkey landed is just that, a Myth. If it were true then Turkey would have had no casualties on landing.
Get Real! wrote:zan wrote:The two sides were in completely different situations. We were confined to 3% of our own country and basically left to rot. Unemployed and poor. You guys had the run of the country in all aspects. We were the forgotten people. We were surrounded by hostile forces that had double crossed us before. Then the killing started as the coupists made their move...Cypriots were being killed and we thought we would be next when the GCs secured the island and once again stopped Turkey from intervening. Our positions in Girne and a few other strongholds were attacked before Turkey arrived so what were they using....Blanks......Lets get this whole thing into perspective and then we might actually move on. The myth that we were attacked only after Turkey landed is just that, a Myth. If it were true then Turkey would have had no casualties on landing.
Utter garbage! I've made red all that is untrue. I'm not going to waste an hour supplying you with maps and all evidence required because it would not be the first time and you're too stupid to read anyway and you'll come up with this fabricated version of events time and time again regardless.
Do yourself and your community a BIG favor and just get off the airways.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests