Cyprus-Forum.com

[Get Real!]

In case you don't suffer from monochromatism, you figure it out from the coloured parts of your own quotes.

You seemingly base your theory on interracial marriages and/or intercourse but fail to take into consideration that the number of people who DID NOT engage in interracial marriages and/or intercourse were FAR GREATER or there wouldn’t be any segregated ethnic groups today and instead we would have just CYPRIOTS, but that is obviously not the case. The ethnic groups obviously managed to stay VERY separated to this day.

Interracial marriages and wide scale conversions of Chirstians to the Mouslim relegion is a well documented fact. The fact that they were practiced on wide scale can be seen by the by 40,000 sudden increase of Christans over the mouslims when the British took over.Those were JUST the recent generation converted ones. Furthermore how do you explain the fact that PURELY TC villages had PURELY Greek names before 1974 even names like Ayios XXX.How do you explain the fact that purely TC villages were not even speaking Turkish before 1974, whereas a few miles away other TC were? How do you explain the fact the mainland Turks don't even consider the TCs as Turks because they look so different than them and they call them "British Bas..s" Is it because perhaps a lot of them are actually decendents of the Latins?

Therefore at least I have some factual evidence.

What is YOUR evidence that the TC community was not by large formed this way?Just your assumption that the majority have not converted neither mixed?
May i remind you that all was needed to have an 18% TC community (half of which were actually converted GCs/Latins or the product of forced wife-taking) was just 1 out of 10 Christians to have converted over a period of so many generations?

Finally how do you explain our DNA matching??

But how “wide” could it have possibly been Pyro? Wide enough to bastardize the entire population?

You’ve taken the word “wide” and are using it as a wild card to suit your imagination when it is mutually agreed upon by both sides that they AVOIDED each other and the slightest urge for an interracial couple to meet was frowned upon by both communities to use a mild expression.

Any notion that all women were raped by the other side is rubbish.

As for the TCs being called "British bastards" well that’s understandable because under the treaty of Lausanne they DID become British!

[oranos64]

After years of interrogation the Turkish Cypriots have finally confessed!

We're a bunch of Turkish peasants that were dumped and neglected in Cyprus by the Ottomans. The End.

Followed by a confirmation…

Ahmen!!!

(Please excuse Zanny who lives up to the description with a classic spelling mistake)

http://www.cyprus-forum.com/viewtopic.p ... 730#213730

Victory is sweet…

was not most of southern europe from Italy down to Greece etc ... pheasants ...seriously who cares

yes Turks were sent here by Turks/ottomans etc ...

and so did Greeks and other nations come her for over 2 thousand years we had greek invasions ,arabic etc ..

the longest remaining culture on the island was Greek and so is still the dominant culture

obviously the second is turkish due to ottoman rule and had impact ...

but the dominate is greek ....

end of

[Pyrpolizer]

In case you don't suffer from monochromatism, you figure it out from the coloured parts of your own quotes.

You seemingly base your theory on interracial marriages and/or intercourse but fail to take into consideration that the number of people who DID NOT engage in interracial marriages and/or intercourse were FAR GREATER or there wouldn’t be any segregated ethnic groups today and instead we would have just CYPRIOTS, but that is obviously not the case. The ethnic groups obviously managed to stay VERY separated to this day.

Interracial marriages and wide scale conversions of Chirstians to the Mouslim relegion is a well documented fact. The fact that they were practiced on wide scale can be seen by the by 40,000 sudden increase of Christans over the mouslims when the British took over.Those were JUST the recent generation converted ones. Furthermore how do you explain the fact that PURELY TC villages had PURELY Greek names before 1974 even names like Ayios XXX.How do you explain the fact that purely TC villages were not even speaking Turkish before 1974, whereas a few miles away other TC were? How do you explain the fact the mainland Turks don't even consider the TCs as Turks because they look so different than them and they call them "British Bas..s" Is it because perhaps a lot of them are actually decendents of the Latins?

Therefore at least I have some factual evidence.

What is YOUR evidence that the TC community was not by large formed this way?Just your assumption that the majority have not converted neither mixed?
May i remind you that all was needed to have an 18% TC community (half of which were actually converted GCs/Latins or the product of forced wife-taking) was just 1 out of 10 Christians to have converted over a period of so many generations?

Finally how do you explain our DNA matching??

But how “wide” could it have possibly been Pyro? Wide enough to bastardize the entire population?

You’ve taken the word “wide” and are using it as a wild card to suit your imagination when it is mutually agreed upon by both sides that they AVOIDED each other and the slightest urge for an interracial couple to meet was frowned upon by both communities to use a mild expression.

Any notion that all women were raped by the other side is rubbish.

As for the TCs being called "British bastards" well that’s understandable because under the treaty of Lausanne they DID become British!

Yes as wide as to bastardize the entire population to the degree that you cannot tell who is a GC and who is a TC just by his/her phenotype.

[Beth_Josephine]

Correct me if I am wrong but wasn't Cyprus given to Cleopatra as a present, way back when? This island has a vast history with many nationalities, you have eygpt, turkey, greece, England, the Arab states and such.

When I say England, I mean Richard the Lion heart and the crusades, he lived in Paphos, did he not? So, could yu say he was the first brit to settle on this island lol

[phoenix]

TOTALLY WRONG! Go see the results of the proffessor who did the testings. We are not talking for GROUP TO GROUP DNA matching. If it were like that then all people all around the world would have 100% DNA GROUP matchings because they are HUMAN as you said. Do you think the Cypriot American who made that search would be so stupid?

Pyrpolizer:

I am really having trouble tracking down this study in ANY of the reputable peer-reviewed publications records.

Any chance you could give me a reference or link or name to chase up? I would be interested in scrutinising this article.

Much obliged

[DT.]

Correct me if I am wrong but wasn't Cyprus given to Cleopatra as a present, way back when? This island has a vast history with many nationalities, you have eygpt, turkey, greece, England, the Arab states and such.

When I say England, I mean Richard the Lion heart and the crusades, he lived in Paphos, did he not? So, could yu say he was the first brit to settle on this island lol

Yeah but Ole King Dick was kicked out for hs binge drinking along with his pikey troops. It was a terrible period, chavs everywhere, everyone wearing burberry or liverpool shirts, maidens walking around saying "DO i look bovered?"...etc

[Pyrpolizer]

TOTALLY WRONG! Go see the results of the proffessor who did the testings. We are not talking for GROUP TO GROUP DNA matching. If it were like that then all people all around the world would have 100% DNA GROUP matchings because they are HUMAN as you said. Do you think the Cypriot American who made that search would be so stupid?

Pyrpolizer:

I am really having trouble tracking down this study in ANY of the reputable peer-reviewed publications records.

Any chance you could give me a reference or link or name to chase up? I would be interested in scrutinising this article.

Much obliged

I saw it once in the internet, probably 3 years ago. i remember very well it was done by a TC scientist living in the USA. I today checked all possible sources I could think of, but couldn't find it.

[phoenix]

TOTALLY WRONG! Go see the results of the proffessor who did the testings. We are not talking for GROUP TO GROUP DNA matching. If it were like that then all people all around the world would have 100% DNA GROUP matchings because they are HUMAN as you said. Do you think the Cypriot American who made that search would be so stupid?

Pyrpolizer:

I am really having trouble tracking down this study in ANY of the reputable peer-reviewed publications records.

Any chance you could give me a reference or link or name to chase up? I would be interested in scrutinising this article.

Much obliged

I saw it once in the internet, probably 3 years ago. i remember very well it was done by a TC scientist living in the USA. I today checked all possible sources I could think of, but couldn't find it.

Well my conclusion after extensive searches is that it's a complete fabrication.
There was never enough material to formulate such an assertion in the first place.
How can we set the record straight on this one because it is such a harmful hypothesis to have doing the rounds?

[Get Real!]

TOTALLY WRONG! Go see the results of the proffessor who did the testings. We are not talking for GROUP TO GROUP DNA matching. If it were like that then all people all around the world would have 100% DNA GROUP matchings because they are HUMAN as you said. Do you think the Cypriot American who made that search would be so stupid?

Pyrpolizer:

I am really having trouble tracking down this study in ANY of the reputable peer-reviewed publications records.

Any chance you could give me a reference or link or name to chase up? I would be interested in scrutinising this article.

Much obliged

I saw it once in the internet, probably 3 years ago. i remember very well it was done by a TC scientist living in the USA. I today checked all possible sources I could think of, but couldn't find it.

Well my conclusion after extensive searches is that it's a complete fabrication.
There was never enough material to formulate such an assertion in the first place.
How can we set the record straight on this one because it is such a harmful hypothesis to have doing the rounds?

I say shoot Pyro for being gullible!