MicAtCyp wrote:Cannedmoose,
the best thing accedemics are good at, is to cause a deeeep sleep to their students at the auditorium....
A slightly biased comment and judging by your spelling, not one that is derived from practical experience... sorry if that's a jibe at your english-language skills, but it's a response to your jibe at my chosen profession, so I think it's fair. I do however agree that some academics do 'have their heads up their own arse', and fail to understand the real world that they look at from their ivory towers. Thankfully, I'm not a 'pure academic' in that respect since I did go out and work in the real world for a number of years before returning to study... so I do understand how people really think and how personal motives often affect their judgement. But, I reiterate, in the cases of Verheugen and De Soto, from my knowledge of both of them they are honourable men, with no history of corruption or dishonesty. So unless I see proof, I fundamentally disagree with your accusations against them.
MicAtCyp wrote:It seems to me that in your dreams, you see me dreaming. I was talking about the incident at Luxemberg man, where De Soto just traveled to oppose Papadopoulos speach. Wake up!
Although the tone of your remarks is incredibly condescending and patronising, I will reply to this. Firstly, the ICF 2005 is taking place at the European Parliament building, which is in Brussels, not Luxembourg, so factually you're already flailing in the water... as for De Soto 'travelling purely to oppose TPaps speech' (a speech that I actually thought was incredibly good), you are again wrong. De Soto was a confirmed speaker at the Conference (see link below) and would have been invited to give an address well in advance... he did not simply 'turn up' to respond to TPap as you would again know if you understood the world of conferences and public speaking.
http://www.federalism2005.be/en/home/press_info/MicAtCyp wrote:PS2. I could present one by one the cases indicating "something fishy" behind the actions of both Verhoigen and De Soto. But what for? You could still accuse me of having no solid proof...
Once again MicAtCyp, put your money where your mouth is... if you feel you have proof, share it... if you don't really have proof, don't pretend to.
MicAtCyp wrote:PS3. What does this Canned-moose mean? Is it some sort of canned food, or what? Just curious.
Maybe you should wake up this time... look to the left of this text and there it is... perhaps you're too focussed on your bias against Verheugen and De Soto to work on your observational skills.
Finally, I really don't appreciate the patronising manner in which you addressed my previous remarks, hence why I have responded in kind. If you are going to make a contribution to this forum, you should do so in a more respectful manner. It demeans you to take such a combative approach and demeans me by making me respond in this manner, however, I'm not one to turn the other cheek. Respect me and I'll give you the same in return.